Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

Its wordings

Code of Criminal Procedure

Article 321-3, paragraph (1)

第三百二十一条の三第一項

Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today

How the changes are shown

Underlined: words the amendment adds. A bar: where it removes words.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.

  1. In force today

    The recording medium on which the statement of the person set forth in item (i) and the circumstances thereof have been recorded by a method of simultaneously recording audio and video (limited to a recording of the statement and its circumstances from the start to the end of the interview in which the statement was made) may, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 321, paragraph (1), be used as evidence if the court finds that the statement was made under circumstances in which the measures set forth in item (ii) were particularly taken, and deems it appropriate considering the circumstances up to the time of the interview and other circumstances. In this case, the court must, after the examination of the recording medium, give the persons concerned in the case an opportunity to examine the person who made the statement as a witness.

    第一号に掲げる者の供述及びその状況を録音及び録画を同時に行う方法により記録した記録媒体(その供述がされた聴取の開始から終了に至るまでの間における供述及びその状況を記録したものに限る。)は、その供述が第二号に掲げる措置が特に採られた情況の下にされたものであると認める場合であつて、聴取に至るまでの情況その他の事情を考慮し相当と認めるときは、第三百二十一条第一項の規定にかかわらず、証拠とすることができる。この場合において、裁判所は、その記録媒体を取り調べた後、訴訟関係人に対し、その供述者を証人として尋問する機会を与えなければならない。

  2. Not yet in force Act No. 39 of 2025 Reworded

    The recording medium electronic or magnetic record on which the statement of the person set forth in item (i) and the circumstances thereof have been recorded by a method of simultaneously recording audio and video (limited to a recording of the statement and its circumstances from the start to the end of the interview in which the statement was made) may, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 321, paragraph (1), be used as evidence if the court finds that the statement was made under circumstances in which the measures set forth in item (ii) were particularly taken, and deems it appropriate considering the circumstances up to the time of the interview and other circumstances. In this case, the court must, after the examination of the recording mediumelectronic or magnetic record, give the persons concerned in the case an opportunity to examine the person who made the statement as a witness.

    第一号に掲げる者の供述及びその状況を録音及び録画を同時に行う方法により記録した記録媒体電磁的記録(その供述がされた聴取の開始から終了に至るまでの間における供述及びその状況を記録したものに限る。)は、その供述が第二号に掲げる措置が特に採られた情況の下にされたものであると認める場合であつて、聴取に至るまでの情況その他の事情を考慮し相当と認めるときは、第三百二十一条第一項の規定にかかわらず、証拠とすることができる。この場合において、裁判所は、その記録媒体電磁的記録を取り調べた後、訴訟関係人に対し、その供述者を証人として尋問する機会を与えなければならない。

Compare any two wordings