Code of Criminal Procedure
Article 271-6, paragraph (5)
第二百七十一条の六第五項
Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today
In force today
With regard to a case for which the extract of the charging sheet, etc. has been submitted pursuant to Article 271-2, paragraph (2), if the court finds that, among the particulars identifying an individual stated in the charging sheet, those not stated in the extract of the charging sheet, etc. are those of a person set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii) of that Article, and if a request has been made under Article 46 by the defendant or other persons concerned in the case (excluding the public prosecutor and the defense counsel), then, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or other persons concerned in the case who made the request, if it finds it appropriate, it may deliver an extract of the written decision or the trial record in which the judicial decision is recorded, in which those particulars identifying an individual are not stated; provided, however, that this does not apply when it becomes impossible to confirm whether or not the person pertaining to those particulars identifying an individual has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement, or when it is otherwise likely to substantially harm the defense of the defendant.
裁判所は、第二百七十一条の二第二項の規定による起訴状抄本等の提出があつた事件について、起訴状に記載された個人特定事項のうち起訴状抄本等に記載がないものが同条第一項第一号又は第二号に掲げる者のものに該当すると認める場合において、被告人その他訴訟関係人（検察官及び弁護人を除く。）から第四十六条の規定による請求があつた場合であつて、検察官及び当該請求をした被告人その他訴訟関係人の意見を聴き、相当と認めるときは、裁判書又は裁判を記載した調書の抄本であつて当該個人特定事項の記載がないものを交付することができる。ただし、当該個人特定事項に係る者の供述の証明力の判断に資するような被告人その他の関係者との利害関係の有無を確かめることができなくなるときその他の被告人の防御に実質的な不利益を生ずるおそれがあるときは、この限りでない。
With regard to a case for which
the extract of the charging sheet, etc.a request has beensubmittedmade pursuant to Article 271-2, paragraph(2)(1), if the court finds that, amongthe particulars identifying an individualstated in the charging sheet, those not stated in the extract of the charging sheet, etc.pertaining to the request are those of a person set forth inparagraph (1),item (i) or item (ii) of thatArticleparagraph, and if a requesthas been made under Article 46set forth in the following items has been made by the defendant or other persons concerned in the case (excluding the public prosecutor and the defense counsel), then, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defendant or other persons concerned in the case who made the request, if it finds it appropriate, it maydeliver an extract of the written decision or the trial record in which the judicial decision is recorded, in which those particulars identifying an individual are not statedtake the measure prescribed in the relevant item; provided, however, that this does not apply when it becomes impossible to confirm whether or not the person pertaining to those particulars identifying an individual has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement, or when it is otherwise likely to substantially harm the defense of the defendant.裁判所は、第二百七十一条の二
第二項第一項の規定による起訴状抄本等の提出求めがあつた事件について、起訴状に記載された個人特定事項のうち起訴状抄本等に記載がないものが同条第一項当該求めに係る個人特定事項が同項第一号又は第二号に掲げる者のものに該当すると認める場合において、被告人その他訴訟関係人（検察官及び弁護人を除く。）から第四十六条の規定によ次の各号に掲げる請求があつた場合であつて、検察官及び当該請求をした被告人その他訴訟関係人の意見を聴き、相当と認めるときは、裁判書又は裁判を記載した調書の抄本であつて当該個人特定事項の記載がないものを交付す当該各号に定める措置をとることができる。ただし、当該個人特定事項に係る者の供述の証明力の判断に資するような被告人その他の関係者との利害関係の有無を確かめることができなくなるときその他の被告人の防御に実質的な不利益を生ずるおそれがあるときは、この限りでない。