Code of Criminal Procedure
Article 271-6, paragraph (4)
第二百七十一条の六第四項
Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today
In force today
With regard to a case prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (2), if the court finds that, among the particulars identifying an individual stated in the charging sheet, those not stated in the extract of the charging sheet, etc. are those of a person set forth in Article 271-2, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii), and if a request has been made by the defense counsel under Article 46, then, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defense counsel, if it finds it appropriate, it may deliver an extract of the written decision or the trial record in which the judicial decision is recorded, in which those particulars identifying an individual are not stated, or, when delivering to the defense counsel a transcript or extract of the written decision or the trial record in which the judicial decision is recorded, set a condition that the defense counsel must not make those particulars identifying an individual known to the defendant, or designate the time or method of making them known to the defendant; provided, however, that this does not apply when it becomes impossible to confirm whether or not the person pertaining to those particulars identifying an individual has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement, or when it is otherwise likely to substantially harm the defense of the defendant.
裁判所は、第二項本文に規定する事件について、起訴状に記載された個人特定事項のうち起訴状抄本等に記載がないものが第二百七十一条の二第一項第一号又は第二号に掲げる者のものに該当すると認める場合において、弁護人から第四十六条の規定による請求があつた場合であつて、検察官及び弁護人の意見を聴き、相当と認めるときは、裁判書若しくは裁判を記載した調書の抄本であつて当該個人特定事項の記載がないものを交付し、又は弁護人に裁判書若しくは裁判を記載した調書の謄本若しくは抄本を交付するに当たり、当該個人特定事項を被告人に知らせてはならない旨の条件を付し、若しくは被告人に知らせる時期若しくは方法を指定することができる。ただし、当該個人特定事項に係る者の供述の証明力の判断に資するような被告人その他の関係者との利害関係の有無を確かめることができなくなるときその他の被告人の防御に実質的な不利益を生ずるおそれがあるときは、この限りでない。
With regard to a case prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (2), if the court finds that
, amongthe particulars identifying an individualstated in the charging sheet, those not stated in the extract of the charging sheet, etc.pertaining to the request under Article 271-2, paragraph (1) are those of a person set forth inArticle 271-2, paragraph (1),item (i) or item (ii) of that paragraph, andifa request set forth in one of the following items has been made by the defense counselunder Article 46, then, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defense counsel, if it finds it appropriate, it maydeliver an extract of the written decision or the trial record in which the judicial decision is recorded, in which those particulars identifying an individual are not stated, or, when delivering to the defense counsel a transcript or extract of the written decision or the trial record in which the judicial decision is recorded, set a condition that the defense counsel must not make those particulars identifying an individual known to the defendant, or designate the time or method of making them known to the defendanttake the measure specified in the relevant item; provided, however, that this does not apply when it becomes impossible to confirm whether or not the person pertaining to those particulars identifying an individual has an interest in the defendant or other persons concerned, which may contribute to the determination of the probative value of that person's statement, or when it is otherwise likely to substantially harm the defense of the defendant.裁判所は、第二項本文に規定する事件について、
起訴状に記載された個人特定事項のうち起訴状抄本等に記載がないものが第二百七十一条の二第一項第二百七十一条の二第一項の規定による求めに係る個人特定事項が同項第一号又は第二号に掲げる者のものに該当すると認める場合において、弁護人から第四十六条の規定によ次の各号に掲げる請求があつた場合であつて、検察官及び弁護人の意見を聴き、相当と認めるときは、裁判書若しくは裁判を記載した調書の抄本であつて当該個人特定事項の記載がないものを交付し、又は弁護人に裁判書若しくは裁判を記載した調書の謄本若しくは抄本を交付するに当たり、当該個人特定事項を被告人に知らせてはならない旨の条件を付し、若しくは被告人に知らせる時期若しくは方法を指定す当該各号に定める措置をとることができる。ただし、当該個人特定事項に係る者の供述の証明力の判断に資するような被告人その他の関係者との利害関係の有無を確かめることができなくなるときその他の被告人の防御に実質的な不利益を生ずるおそれがあるときは、この限りでない。