Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 52-3Submission of Written Report on Changes to Notification on Holding of Voting Rights in a Bank

第五十二条の三(銀行議決権保有届出書に関する変更報告書の提出)

If there is a change in a particular set forth in one of the items of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (for a change in the percentage of voting rights held, limited to when the percentage increases or decreases by at least one percent) after the day on which a person becomes a holder of voting rights that exceeds five percent of the total shareholder voting rights in a single bank or of voting rights that exceeds five percent of the total shareholder voting rights in a single bank holding company, the major holder of voting rights in the bank must submit a written report of that change (hereinafter referred to as a "written report of changes" in this Article and the following Article) to the Prime Minister within five days from the day on which the change occurs (or within the number of days specified by Cabinet Office Order, if the number of voting rights that the person holds has not increased or in other cases specified by Cabinet Office Order), pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Order; provided, however, that this does not apply if the person has already submitted a written report of changes based on a decrease of one percent or more in the percentage of voting rights held, and the percentage of voting rights held which is stated in that written report of changes is five percent or less, or to other cases specified by Cabinet Office Order.

銀行議決権大量保有者は、一の銀行の総株主の議決権の百分の五を超える議決権又は一の銀行持株会社の総株主の議決権の百分の五を超える議決権の保有者となつた日の後に、前条第一項各号に掲げる事項の変更があつた場合(議決権保有割合の変更の場合にあつては、百分の一以上増加し又は減少した場合に限る。)には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、その日から五日以内(保有する議決権の数に増加がない場合その他の内閣府令で定める場合にあつては、内閣府令で定める日以内)に、当該変更に係る報告書(以下この条及び次条において「変更報告書」という。)を内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、議決権保有割合が百分の一以上減少したことによる変更報告書で当該変更報告書に記載された議決権保有割合が百分の五以下であるものを既に提出している場合その他の内閣府令で定める場合については、この限りでない。

In the case that meets the criteria specified by Cabinet Order as a case in which a large number of voting rights have been transferred within a short time span, a person submitting a written report of changes based on a decrease in the percentage of voting rights held must also state the particulars of the party to which they have transferred the voting rights and the consideration received in that written report of changes, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Order.

議決権保有割合が減少したことにより変更報告書を提出する者は、短期間に大量の議決権を譲渡したものとして政令で定める基準に該当する場合においては、内閣府令で定めるところにより、譲渡の相手方及び対価に関する事項についても当該変更報告書に記載しなければならない。

Notwithstanding the provisions of the main clause of paragraph (1), if, by the day before the day on which a person is to submit a notification on holding of voting rights in a bank or a written report of changes (hereinafter referred to as a "document for submission" in this Section), grounds that require the person to submit a new written report of changes arise, the person must submit the new written report of changes to the Prime Minister at the same time as it submits the document for submission that has not been submitted.

銀行議決権保有届出書又は変更報告書(以下この節において「提出書類」という。)を提出する日の前日までに、新たに変更報告書を提出しなければならない事由が生じた場合には、当該変更報告書は、第一項本文の規定にかかわらず、提出されていない当該提出書類の提出と同時に内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。

If a person that has submitted a document for submission finds that the content stated in that document differs from facts, or that the document insufficiently states or lacks a particular required to be stated or a statement of a fact necessary for avoiding misunderstanding, the person must submit an amended written report to the Prime Minister.

提出書類を提出した者は、当該提出書類に記載された内容が事実と相違し、又は記載すべき事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な事実の記載が不十分であり、若しくは欠けていると認めるときは、訂正報告書を内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。

The provisions of Article 2, paragraph (11) apply mutatis mutandis to the voting rights held by a major holder of voting rights in a bank for a case referred to in paragraph (1) or paragraph (2).

第二条第十一項の規定は、第一項及び第二項の場合において銀行議決権大量保有者が保有する議決権について準用する。

Read this in its chapter

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.SourcesTermsPrivacy