No meeting of the Japan Fair Trade Commission may be held, nor may a resolution be effected without the attendance of the Chair and two or more Commissioners.
公正取引委員会は、委員長及び二人以上の委員の出席がなければ、議事を開き、議決することができない。
A Japan Fair Trade Commission's decision is effected by a majority of the attendees. In the event of a tie vote, the Chair is to decide.
公正取引委員会の議事は、出席者の過半数を以て、これを決する。可否同数のときは、委員長の決するところによる。
Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a decision by the Japan Fair Trade Commission under the provisions of Article 31, item (v) must have unanimous concurrence by all Commissioners and the Chair except for the Commissioner or Chair concerned.
For the purpose of applying the provisions of paragraph (1) if the Chair cannot execute the Chair's duties, the Commissioner chosen to act on behalf of the Chair pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article is deemed to be the Chair.
Read this with the articles around it
Fair Trade Commission
公正取引委員会
The body the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (独占禁止法, the Antimonopoly Act) sets up to achieve that Act's purpose — among other things, to promote fair and free competition by banning private monopolization, unreasonable restraint of trade and unfair trade practices, and so to protect the interests of general consumers and the democratic and sound development of the national economy (Antimonopoly Act, Articles 1 and 27, paragraph (1)). It comes under the Prime Minister's jurisdiction, but its chairperson and four commissioners — appointed by the Prime Minister with the consent of both Houses of the Diet — exercise their authority independently (Articles 27, paragraph (2), 28 and 29). Under the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, businesses and trade associations may, with the approval of both the Prime Minister and the Fair Trade Commission, conclude or set agreements or rules (協定又は規約) on premiums or representations (Article 36, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Antimonopoly Act, Arts. 1, 27, 28, 29 and Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations, Art. 36 as a reference.