Chapter VIII Special Provisions on Litigation Proceedings in Summary Court
第八章 簡易裁判所の訴訟手続に関する特則
Article 270Characteristics of Proceedings
第二百七十条(手続の特色)
In summary court, disputes are to be resolved promptly through simplified proceedings.
簡易裁判所においては、簡易な手続により迅速に紛争を解決するものとする。
Article 271Oral Filing of an Action
第二百七十一条(口頭による訴えの提起)
An action may be filed orally.
訴えは、口頭で提起することができる。
Article 272Matters That Must Be Clarified in the Filing of an Action
第二百七十二条(訴えの提起において明らかにすべき事項)
When a person files an action, it is sufficient for them to clarify the main points of the dispute, in lieu of providing a statement of the claims.
訴えの提起においては、請求の原因に代えて、紛争の要点を明らかにすれば足りる。
Article 273Filing of an Action through Voluntary Appearance
第二百七十三条(任意の出頭による訴えの提起等)
It is permitted for both parties to voluntarily appear before the court and conduct oral arguments involving their litigation. To do so, the action is filed through an oral statement.
当事者双方は、任意に裁判所に出頭し、訴訟について口頭弁論をすることができる。この場合においては、訴えの提起は、口頭の陳述によってする。
Article 274Transfer Based on the Filing of a Counterclaim
第二百七十四条(反訴の提起に基づく移送)
If the defendant makes a claim in a counterclaim that is subject to the jurisdiction of the district court, the summary court, at the petition of the adverse party, must transfer the principal action and counterclaim to the district court in the form of a ruling. In such a case, the provisions of Article 22 apply mutatis mutandis.
被告が反訴で地方裁判所の管轄に属する請求をした場合において、相手方の申立てがあるときは、簡易裁判所は、決定で、本訴及び反訴を地方裁判所に移送しなければならない。この場合においては、第二十二条の規定を準用する。
No appeal may be entered against the ruling stated in the preceding paragraph.
前項の決定に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。
Article 275Settlement Prior to the Filing of an Action
第二百七十五条(訴え提起前の和解)
In a civil dispute, a party may file a petition for settlement with the summary court of jurisdiction in the locality that constitutes the general venue for an action involving the adverse party, indicating the prayer for relief and providing a statement of the claims, as well as indicating the actual circumstances of the dispute.
民事上の争いについては、当事者は、請求の趣旨及び原因並びに争いの実情を表示して、相手方の普通裁判籍の所在地を管轄する簡易裁判所に和解の申立てをすることができる。
If a settlement as referred to in the preceding paragraph cannot be reached, the court, at the petition of both parties who have appeared on a date for settlement, immediately orders the parties to present oral arguments in litigation. In such a case, the party who has filed the petition for settlement is deemed to have filed an action at the time that party filed that petition, and settlement costs become a part of the court costs.
前項の和解が調わない場合において、和解の期日に出頭した当事者双方の申立てがあるときは、裁判所は、直ちに訴訟の弁論を命ずる。この場合においては、和解の申立てをした者は、その申立てをした時に、訴えを提起したものとみなし、和解の費用は、訴訟費用の一部とする。
If the petitioner or the adverse party does not appear on a date for settlement as referred to in paragraph (1), the court may deem that no settlement can be reached.
申立人又は相手方が第一項の和解の期日に出頭しないときは、裁判所は、和解が調わないものとみなすことができる。
The provisions of Articles 264 and 265 do not apply to a settlement as referred to in paragraph (1).
Article 275-2Ruling in Lieu of Settlement
第二百七十五条の二(和解に代わる決定)
In an action whose subject matter is a claim for the payment of money, if the defendant does not deny the facts alleged by the plaintiff in oral arguments or does not advance any allegations or evidence, and the court finds it to be appropriate in consideration of the defendant's financial resources and any other circumstances, after hearing the opinion of the plaintiff, the court may issue a ruling ordering the defendant to pay the money under that claim, and establishing rules on a time frame or an installment plan, not exceeding five years from the expiration of the time frame stated in paragraph (3), for paying the money under that claim, and may simultaneously establish that the defendant will be exempted from the obligation to pay any default charges that have accrued after the filing of the action if the defendant pays the money under that claim in accordance with the rules on the time frame or if the defendant pays that money without losing the benefit of time gained from the rules on the installment plan, pursuant to the rules under the following paragraph.
金銭の支払の請求を目的とする訴えについては、裁判所は、被告が口頭弁論において原告の主張した事実を争わず、その他何らの防御の方法をも提出しない場合において、被告の資力その他の事情を考慮して相当であると認めるときは、原告の意見を聴いて、第三項の期間の経過時から五年を超えない範囲内において、当該請求に係る金銭の支払について、その時期の定め若しくは分割払の定めをし、又はこれと併せて、その時期の定めに従い支払をしたとき、若しくはその分割払の定めによる期限の利益を次項の規定による定めにより失うことなく支払をしたときは訴え提起後の遅延損害金の支払義務を免除する旨の定めをして、当該請求に係る金銭の支払を命ずる決定をすることができる。
If the court establishes rules on an installment plan as referred to in the preceding paragraph, it must establish rules on the forfeiture of the benefit of time in the event of the defendant's failure to pay.
前項の分割払の定めをするときは、被告が支払を怠った場合における期限の利益の喪失についての定めをしなければならない。
A party may file an objection against a ruling as referred to in paragraph (1) with the court that has issued that ruling, within an inalterable time frame of two weeks from the day on which the party receives notice of that ruling.
第一項の決定に対しては、当事者は、その決定の告知を受けた日から二週間の不変期間内に、その決定をした裁判所に異議を申し立てることができる。
If an objection is filed within the time frame referred to in the preceding paragraph, the ruling referred to in paragraph (1) ceases to be effective.
If no objection is filed within the time frame referred to in paragraph (3), the ruling referred to in paragraph (1) has the same effect as a judicial settlement.
第二百七十六条(準備書面の省略等)
Oral arguments are not required to be prepared in writing.
口頭弁論は、書面で準備することを要しない。
Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, written preparations must be made or the adverse party must be given direct notice prior to oral arguments with regard to any matter for which it would be found that the adverse party is unable to enter a statement without preparation.
相手方が準備をしなければ陳述をすることができないと認めるべき事項は、前項の規定にかかわらず、書面で準備し、又は口頭弁論前直接に相手方に通知しなければならない。
During oral arguments for which the adverse party is not present in court, no matter prescribed in the preceding paragraph may be alleged other than what is stated in a brief that falls under any of the following or conveyed in the notice under the provisions of that paragraph.
a brief that has been served on the adverse party;
相手方に送達された準備書面
a brief for which the adverse party has submitted written acknowledgment of receipt; or
相手方からその準備書面を受領した旨を記載した書面が提出された場合における当該準備書面
a brief that the adverse party has inspected pursuant to the provisions of Article 91-2, paragraph (1) or copied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of that Article.
相手方が第九十一条の二第一項の規定により準備書面の閲覧をし、又は同条第二項の規定により準備書面の複写をした場合における当該準備書面
Article 277Constructive Statements on Further Dates
第二百七十七条(続行期日における陳述の擬制)
The provisions of Article 158 apply mutatis mutandis if the plaintiff or the defendant does not appear on a further date for oral arguments or appears on that date but does not present any oral arguments on the merits.
第百五十八条の規定は、原告又は被告が口頭弁論の続行の期日に出頭せず、又は出頭したが本案の弁論をしない場合について準用する。
Article 277-2Examinations Based on Communication Using Audiovisual Transmissions
第二百七十七条の二(映像等の送受信による通話の方法による尋問)
As provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, if the court finds it to be appropriate, it may conduct the examination of witnesses or the parties themselves using a means that enables persons to communicate with one another through audio and visual transmissions while gaining an awareness of one another' situation.
裁判所は、相当と認めるときは、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、映像と音声の送受信により相手の状態を相互に認識しながら通話をすることができる方法によって、証人又は当事者本人の尋問をすることができる。
Article 278Submission of Documents in Lieu of Examination
第二百七十八条(尋問等に代わる書面の提出)
If the court finds it to be appropriate, it may allow the submission of a paper document in lieu of examining a witness or one of the parties themselves or instead of having an expert state an opinion.
裁判所は、相当と認めるときは、証人若しくは当事者本人の尋問又は鑑定人の意見の陳述に代え、書面の提出をさせることができる。
The provisions of Article 205, paragraphs (2) and (3) apply mutatis mutandis to the submission of a paper document in lieu of the examination of witnesses or the parties themselves under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 215, paragraphs (2) and (4) apply mutatis mutandis to the submission of a paper document in lieu of the statement of an opinion by an expert.
Article 279Judicial Commissioners
第二百七十九条(司法委員)
If the court finds it to be necessary, it may have a judicial commissioner assist in the attempt to arrange a settlement or have a judicial commissioner attend the trial so that it may hear the commissioner's opinion on the case.
裁判所は、必要があると認めるときは、和解を試みるについて司法委員に補助をさせ、又は司法委員を審理に立ち会わせて事件につきその意見を聴くことができる。
The number of judicial commissioners is one or more for each case.
司法委員の員数は、各事件について一人以上とする。
A judicial commissioner is designated by the court for each case, from among persons appointed in advance by the district court each year.
司法委員は、毎年あらかじめ地方裁判所の選任した者の中から、事件ごとに裁判所が指定する。
The status of persons appointed pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, their number, and particulars that are otherwise necessary in connection with an appointment as referred to in that paragraph are specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.
A judicial commissioner is paid travel expenses, a daily allowance, and lodging expenses in the amounts specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.
司法委員には、最高裁判所規則で定める額の旅費、日当及び宿泊料を支給する。
Article 280Particulars That Must Be Recorded in Electronic Judgments
第二百八十条(電子判決書の記録事項)
In recording, pursuant to the provisions of Article 252, paragraph (1), the facts referred to in item (ii) of that paragraph and the reasons referred to in item (iii) of that paragraph, it is sufficient to record the important points of the prayer for relief and of the statement of the claims, the existence or nonexistence of cause, and the important points of any defense which is the grounds for rejecting the claim.
第二百五十二条第一項の規定により同項第二号の事実及び同項第三号の理由を記録する場合には、請求の趣旨及び原因の要旨、その原因の有無並びに請求を排斥する理由である抗弁の要旨を記録すれば足りる。