If there are circumstances prescribed in Article 312, paragraph (1) or (2), the final appellate court must reverse the prior instance judgment, and, except in the cases referred to in the following Article, it must remand the case to the court of prior instance or transfer the case to another, equivalent court. The same applies if the high court is the final appellate court and a violation of law or regulation has clearly influenced the judgment.
Even without the circumstances prescribed in Article 312, paragraph (1) or (2), the Supreme Court, as the final appellate court, may reverse a prior instance judgment if a violation of law or regulation has clearly influenced the judgment, and, except in the cases referred to in the following Article, it may remand the case to the court of prior instance or transfer the case to another, equivalent court.
The court to which a case is remanded or transferred pursuant to the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs must reach a judicial decision based on additional oral arguments. In such a case, the factual or legal finding based on which the final appellate court has reversed the judgment is binding on the court to which the case is remanded or transferred.
前二項の規定により差戻し又は移送を受けた裁判所は、新たな口頭弁論に基づき裁判をしなければならない。この場合において、上告裁判所が破棄の理由とした事実上及び法律上の判断は、差戻し又は移送を受けた裁判所を拘束する。
A judge who has participated in the prior instance judgment may not participate in the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph.
原判決に関与した裁判官は、前項の裁判に関与することができない。