Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 25Stay of Execution

第二十五条(執行停止)

The filing of an action for the revocation of the original administrative disposition does not preclude the effect of the original administrative disposition, the execution of the original administrative disposition or the continuation of any subsequent procedure.

処分の取消しの訴えの提起は、処分の効力、処分の執行又は手続の続行を妨げない。

Where an action for the revocation of the original administrative disposition is filed, if there is an urgent necessity in order to avoid any serious damage that would be caused by the original administrative disposition, the execution of the original administrative disposition or the continuation of any subsequent procedure, the court may, upon petition, by an order, stay the whole or part of the effect of the original administrative disposition, the execution of the original administrative disposition or the continuation of any subsequent procedure (hereinafter referred to as "stay of execution"); provided, however, that the court may not stay the effect of an original administrative disposition if the purpose can be achieved by staying the execution of the original administrative disposition or staying the continuation of any subsequent procedure.

処分の取消しの訴えの提起があつた場合において、処分、処分の執行又は手続の続行により生ずる重大な損害を避けるため緊急の必要があるときは、裁判所は、申立てにより、決定をもつて、処分の効力、処分の執行又は手続の続行の全部又は一部の停止(以下「執行停止」という。)をすることができる。ただし、処分の効力の停止は、処分の執行又は手続の続行の停止によつて目的を達することができる場合には、することができない。

When judging whether or not any serious damage would be caused as prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the court is to consider the degree of difficulty in recovering from the damage and to take into consideration the nature and extent of the damage as well as the content and nature of the original administrative disposition.

裁判所は、前項に規定する重大な損害を生ずるか否かを判断するに当たつては、損害の回復の困難の程度を考慮するものとし、損害の性質及び程度並びに処分の内容及び性質をも勘案するものとする。

Stay of execution may not be allowed when it is likely to seriously affect public welfare or when the action on the merits seems groundless.

執行停止は、公共の福祉に重大な影響を及ぼすおそれがあるとき、又は本案について理由がないとみえるときは、することができない。

An order set forth in paragraph (2) is made based on a prima facie showing.

第二項の決定は、疎明に基づいてする。

An order set forth in paragraph (2) may be made without oral argument; provided, however, that the court must hear opinions in advance from the parties before making the order.

第二項の決定は、口頭弁論を経ないですることができる。ただし、あらかじめ、当事者の意見をきかなければならない。

An immediate appeal may be filed against an order on a petition set forth in paragraph (2).

第二項の申立てに対する決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。

An immediate appeal against an order set forth in paragraph (2) does not have the effect of staying the execution of the order.

第二項の決定に対する即時抗告は、その決定の執行を停止する効力を有しない。

Read this in its chapter

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.SourcesTermsPrivacy