Article 133Special Provisions on Depreciation Allowance for Machinery and Equipment Used Beyond Normal Hours of Use
第百三十三条(通常の使用時間を超えて使用される機械及び装置の償却費の特例)
Where the hours of use of machinery and equipment that a Resident who submits a Blue Return holds (limited to those for which the former straight-line method, former declining-balance method, straight-line method or declining-balance method has been adopted as the method of depreciation to be followed) exceed the average hours of use of that machinery and equipment under the normal economic conditions of the Resident's business that is to generate real property income, business income or timber income, and the Resident has submitted to the competent district director with jurisdiction over the place for tax payment, by the Filing Deadline for income tax for that year, a document stating that the Resident intends to treat as the amount of the depreciation allowance of that machinery and equipment for that year the sum of the amount of the depreciation allowance of that machinery and equipment for that year and the amount calculated by multiplying that amount of depreciation allowance by the additional depreciation ratio calculated, as provided by Ministry of Finance Order, as corresponding to the degree of wear and tear from use beyond that average hours of use of that machinery and equipment, and other particulars specified by Ministry of Finance Order, and retains documents certifying that the machinery and equipment was used beyond those average hours of use, the amount to be included in necessary expenses as the depreciation allowance of that machinery and equipment in calculating the amount of real property income, amount of business income or amount of timber income for that year is, notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two Articles, that sum; provided, however, that this does not apply where that additional depreciation ratio is less than 10 percent.
青色申告書を提出する居住者が、その有する機械及び装置(そのよるべき償却の方法として旧定額法、旧定率法、定額法又は定率法を採用しているものに限る。)の使用時間がその者の行う不動産所得、事業所得又は山林所得を生ずべき業務の通常の経済事情における当該機械及び装置の平均的な使用時間を超える場合において、当該機械及び装置の当該年分の償却費の額と当該償却費の額に当該機械及び装置の当該平均的な使用時間を超えて使用することによる損耗の程度に応ずるものとして財務省令で定めるところにより計算した増加償却割合を乗じて計算した金額との合計額をもつて当該機械及び装置の当該年分の償却費の額としようとする旨その他財務省令で定める事項を記載した書類を、当該年分の所得税に係る確定申告期限までに、納税地の所轄税務署長に提出し、かつ、当該平均的な使用時間を超えて使用したことを証する書類を保存しているときは、当該機械及び装置の償却費として当該年分の不動産所得の金額、事業所得の金額又は山林所得の金額の計算上必要経費に算入する金額は、前二条の規定にかかわらず、当該合計額とする。ただし、当該増加償却割合が百分の十に満たない場合は、この限りでない。
Read this with the articles around it
depreciation allowancemachine translation
「償却費」
The depreciation of a depreciable asset worked out under Article 49, paragraph (1) of the Income Tax Act.
Defined inArticle 120, paragraph (1)· applies only in this subsection
former declining-balance methodmachine translation
「旧定率法」
In Article 120 and the rules on calculating depreciation, the method of depreciating an asset each year by multiplying its acquisition cost (from the second year, less the depreciation already counted as necessary expenses) by a rate set for its useful life, so that the depreciation falls by a fixed proportion each year.
Defined inArticle 120, paragraph (1), item (i), (a), (2)· applies only in this division and in Part 2, Chapter 1, Section 4, Subsection 4, Division 3
district director
税務署長
The head of a tax office (税務署), the local office of the National Tax Agency that deals with taxpayers in its district (Act for Establishment of the Ministry of Finance, Article 24). It is the office a person usually deals with: an income tax return is filed with a district director (Income Tax Act, Article 120, paragraph (1)), and reassessments, determinations and the collection of national tax are done by the district director for the taxpayer's current place for tax payment (Act on General Rules for National Taxes, Articles 30 and 43). A person who objects to what a district director has decided can ask that director to look at it again (再調査の請求) or go straight to the National Tax Tribunal (Article 75, paragraph (1), item (i)) — unless the notice of the decision says officials of a Regional Taxation Bureau or of the National Tax Agency investigated, in which case it counts as the regional commissioner's decision, with the same choice, or as the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency's, which can only be challenged by a request for review to the Commissioner (Article 75, paragraph (2)).
Written by AI using Act for Establishment of the Ministry of Finance, Art. 24, Act on General Rules for National Taxes, Arts. 30, 43, 75 and Income Tax Act, Art. 120 as a reference.