Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt by 13 June 2028, on a day set by — at the latest in 2 years

Read the text in force →

Financial Instruments and Exchange Act

金融商品取引法(きんゆうしょうひんとりひきほう)

Chapter IX Investigations in Criminal Cases (Articles 210 to 211-3)

The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts to Promote the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Civil Procedures, etc. (Act No. 53 of 2023) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

Chapter IX Investigations in Criminal Cases第九章 犯則事件の調査等

Article 210第二百十条

Questioning, Examination, and Retention(質問、検査又は領置等)
Article 210, paragraph (1)

An official of the securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (hereinafter referred to as the "Commission" in this Chapter) (hereinafter such an official is referred to as a "Commission official" in this Chapter) may, if this is necessary for investigating a criminal case (meaning a case relating to a crime referred to in Chapter VIII that is specified by Cabinet Order as a crime that is detrimental to the fairness of the purchase and sale or other transactions of securities or crypto-and other assets or of derivatives transactions, etc., or as any other crime that is necessary and appropriate to be made subject to investigation by Commission officials for the public interest or investor protection; hereinafter the same applies in this Chapter), request a suspect or witness (hereinafter referred to as a "suspect or witness in a criminal case" in this paragraph and paragraph (1) of the following Article) to appear, ask questions to a suspect or witness in a criminal case, inspect articles in the possession of or abandoned by a suspect or witness in a criminal case, or retain articles that a suspect or witness in a criminal case voluntarily submits or abandons.

証券取引等監視委員会(以下この章において「委員会」という。)の職員(以下この章において「委員会職員」という。)は、犯則事件(第八章の罪のうち、有価証券若しくは暗号等資産の売買その他の取引又はデリバティブ取引等の公正を害するものその他の委員会職員の調査の対象とすることが公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして政令で定めるものに係る事件をいう。以下この章において同じ。)を調査するため必要があるときは、犯則嫌疑者若しくは参考人(以下この項及び次条第一項において「犯則嫌疑者等」という。)に対して出頭を求め、犯則嫌疑者等に対して質問し、犯則嫌疑者等が所持し若しくは置き去つた物件を検査し、又は犯則嫌疑者等が任意に提出し、若しくは置き去つた物件を領置することができる。

Article 210, paragraph (2)

The Commission official may inquire with public agencies, or public or private organizations, and request them to report necessary particulars for the investigation of criminal cases.

委員会職員は、犯則事件の調査について、官公署又は公私の団体に照会して必要な事項の報告を求めることができる。

Article 211第二百十一条

Inspection, Search, or Seizure(臨検、捜索又は差押え等)
Article 211, paragraph (1)

If it is necessary for investigating a criminal case, a Commission official may conduct an inspection; search the body of a suspect or witness in a criminal case, an object of a suspect or witness in a criminal case, or a residence or any other place associated with a suspect or witness in a criminal case; seize an article of evidence or a thing the official considers to be an object that should be confiscated; or issue an order to provide electronic or magnetic records (meaning an order to provide necessary electronic or magnetic records to the persons set forth in the following items by the methods specified in those items (limited to an order given by designating the electronic or magnetic records to be provided and the method of provision); hereinafter the same applies in this Chapter) through a warrant issued in advance by the judge of the district court or summary court that has jurisdiction over the locality of the Commission; provided, however, that a Commission official may search the body of a witness, an object associated with a witness, or a residence or any other place associated with a witness only if there are sufficient circumstances for the official to discern the existence of an object to be seized.

委員会職員は、犯則事件を調査するため必要があるときは、委員会の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所又は簡易裁判所の裁判官があらかじめ発する許可状により、臨検、犯則嫌疑者等の身体、物件若しくは住居その他の場所の捜索、証拠物若しくは没収すべき物件と思料するものの差押え又は電磁的記録提供命令(次の各号に掲げる者に対し、当該各号に定める方法により必要な電磁的記録を提供することを命ずる命令(提供させるべき電磁的記録及び提供の方法を指定してするものに限る。)をいう。以下この章において同じ。)をすることができる。ただし、参考人の身体、物件又は住居その他の場所については、差し押さえるべき物件の存在を認めるに足りる状況のある場合に限り、捜索をすることができる。

Article 211, paragraph (1), item (i)

a person that keeps electronic or magnetic records: the method set forth in (a) or (b) below;

電磁的記録を保管する者 次のイ又はロに掲げる方法

Article 211, paragraph (1), item (i), (a)

a method of causing an electronic or magnetic record to be recorded on or transferred to a recording medium and causing that recording medium to be submitted;

電磁的記録を記録媒体に記録させ又は移転させて当該記録媒体を提出させる方法

Article 211, paragraph (1), item (i), (b)

a method of causing an electronic or magnetic record to be recorded on or transferred to a recording medium under the control of the person issuing the order, through telecommunication lines;

電気通信回線を通じて電磁的記録を当該命令をする者の管理に係る記録媒体に記録させ又は移転させる方法

Article 211, paragraph (1), item (ii)

a person with the authority to use an electronic or magnetic record (excluding a person set forth in the preceding item): the method set forth in (a) or (b) of that item (limited to a method by which an electronic or magnetic record is recorded on a recording medium).

電磁的記録を利用する権限を有する者(前号に掲げる者を除く。) 同号イ又はロに掲げる方法(電磁的記録を記録媒体に記録させるものに限る。)

Article 211, paragraph (2)

If an object to be seized is a computer, starting from a recording medium connected via telecommunication lines to that computer which may be reasonably supposed that is used to store an electronic or magnetic record that has been made or altered using that computer or an electronic or magnetic record that may be altered or erased using that computer, the computer or the other recording medium may be seized after the electronic or magnetic record is copied onto that computer or that other recording medium.

差し押さえるべき物件が電子計算機であるときは、当該電子計算機に電気通信回線で接続している記録媒体であつて、当該電子計算機で作成若しくは変更をした電磁的記録又は当該電子計算機で変更若しくは消去をすることができることとされている電磁的記録を保管するために使用されていると認めるに足りる状況にあるものから、その電磁的記録を当該電子計算機又は他の記録媒体に複写した上、当該電子計算機又は当該他の記録媒体を差し押さえることができる。

Article 211, paragraph (3)

If a Commission official issues an order to provide electronic or magnetic records and it is necessary to do so, the official may, with the permission of the judge of the district court or summary court that has jurisdiction over the locality of the Commission, order the person who is to receive that order to provide electronic or magnetic records, specifying a period not exceeding one year, not to disclose without good reason the fact of having received that order to provide electronic or magnetic records, or the fact of having provided, or having failed to provide, the electronic or magnetic records ordered to be provided by that order to provide electronic or magnetic records.

委員会職員は、電磁的記録提供命令をする場合において、必要があるときは、委員会の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所又は簡易裁判所の裁判官の許可を受けて、当該電磁的記録提供命令を受ける者に対し、一年を超えない期間を定めて、みだりに当該電磁的記録提供命令を受けたこと及び当該電磁的記録提供命令により提供を命じられた電磁的記録を提供し又は提供しなかつたことを漏らしてはならない旨を命ずることができる。

Article 211, paragraph (4)

In the cases referred to in the preceding three paragraphs, in cases of urgency, a Commission official may make a disposition referred to in the preceding three paragraphs with a warrant issued in advance by the judge of the district court or the summary court that has jurisdiction over the locality of the object or place to be inspected, the body, object, or place to be searched, the object to be seized, or the person who is to provide the electronic or magnetic record.

前三項の場合において、急速を要するときは、委員会職員は、臨検すべき物件若しくは場所、捜索すべき身体、物件若しくは場所、差し押さえるべき物件又は電磁的記録を提供させるべき者の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所又は簡易裁判所の裁判官があらかじめ発する許可状により、前三項の処分をすることができる。

Article 211, paragraph (5)

In requesting a warrant referred to in paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "warrant" in this Chapter, excluding Article 222-4, paragraphs (4) through (8)), a Commission official must submit materials that confirm the existence of a criminal case.

委員会職員は、第一項又は前項の許可状(第二百二十二条の四第四項から第八項までを除き、以下この章において「許可状」という。)を請求する場合においては、犯則事件が存在すると認められる資料を提供しなければならない。

Article 211, paragraph (6)

A warrant may be in the form of an electronic or magnetic record, as well as in writing, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

許可状は、書面によるほか、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電磁的記録によることができる。

Article 211, paragraph (7)

If a Commission official has issued an order under the provisions of paragraph (3) and it has ceased to be necessary, the official must rescind it, on the official's own initiative or at the request of the person who received that order.

委員会職員は、第三項の規定による命令をした場合において、その必要がなくなつたときは、自ら又は当該命令を受けた者の請求により、これを取り消さなければならない。

Article 211, paragraph (8)

If a request under paragraph (5) is made and the judge of the district court or the summary court issues a warrant, that judge must issue to a Commission official a warrant that states or records the name of the suspect in the criminal case (for a corporation, the name of the corporation), the charged offense, the object or place to be inspected, the person, object, or place to be searched, the object to be seized, or the electronic or magnetic record to be provided, the person who is to provide it and the method of provision, the government position and name of the requester, the particulars specified in each of the following items in accordance with the category of cases set forth in that item, the date of issuance, the name of the court, and other particulars specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

第五項の規定による請求があつた場合において、地方裁判所又は簡易裁判所の裁判官が許可状を発するときは、当該裁判官は、犯則嫌疑者の氏名(法人については、名称)、罪名並びに臨検すべき物件若しくは場所、捜索すべき身体、物件若しくは場所、差し押さえるべき物件又は提供させるべき電磁的記録、提供させるべき者及び提供の方法並びに請求者の官職及び氏名、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じ当該各号に定める事項、発付の年月日並びに裁判所名その他最高裁判所規則で定める事項を記載し、又は記録した許可状を委員会職員に発しなければならない。

Article 211, paragraph (8), item (i)

If the warrant is in writing: the valid period, and the fact that after the valid period ends, the warrant may not be executed or an order to provide electronic or magnetic records issued and must be returned;

当該許可状が書面による場合 有効期間及びその期間経過後は執行に着手し、又は電磁的記録提供命令をすることができず許可状を返還しなければならない旨

Article 211, paragraph (8), item (ii)

If the warrant is in the form of an electronic or magnetic record: the valid period, and the fact that after the valid period ends, the warrant may not be executed or an order to provide electronic or magnetic records issued and the Commission official must take measures specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court such as erasing the warrant from the computer used by the Commission official, and must submit to that judge an electronic or magnetic record recording the fact that those measures have been taken.

当該許可状が電磁的記録による場合 有効期間及びその期間経過後は執行に着手し、又は電磁的記録提供命令をすることができず委員会職員の使用に係る電子計算機から許可状を消去することその他の最高裁判所規則で定める措置をとり、かつ、当該措置をとつた旨を記録した電磁的記録を当該裁判官に提出しなければならない旨

Article 211, paragraph (9)

In the case referred to in paragraph (2), in addition to the particulars prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the warrant must state or record the scope of the recording medium that is connected via telecommunication lines to the computer to be seized, and whose electronic or magnetic records are to be copied.

第二項の場合においては、許可状に、前項に規定する事項のほか、差し押さえるべき電子計算機に電気通信回線で接続している記録媒体であつて、その電磁的記録を複写すべきものの範囲を記載し、又は記録しなければならない。

Article 211, paragraph (10)

A warrant must be one for which the measures specified in each of the following items have been taken in accordance with the category of cases set forth in that item.

許可状は、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める措置がとられたものでなければならない。

Article 211, paragraph (10), item (i)

If the warrant is in writing: the judge affixes the judge's name and seal;

当該許可状が書面による場合 当該裁判官が記名押印すること。

Article 211, paragraph (10), item (ii)

If the warrant is in the form of an electronic or magnetic record: the judge takes a measure specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court in place of affixing a name and seal (limited to one by which, when the particulars recorded in the warrant are displayed on the screen of a computer, on paper, or on another thing, the judge's name is also displayed).

当該許可状が電磁的記録による場合 当該裁判官が最高裁判所規則で定める記名押印に代わる措置(当該許可状に記録された事項を電子計算機の映像面、書面その他のものに表示したときに、併せて当該裁判官の氏名が表示されることとなるものに限る。)をとること。

Article 211, paragraph (11)

When the judge of the district court or the summary court grants the permission under paragraph (3), the judge must state or record in the warrant that fact and the period for which the person is ordered not to disclose under the provisions of that paragraph.

地方裁判所又は簡易裁判所の裁判官は、第三項の許可をするときは、許可状にその旨及び同項の規定により漏らしてはならない旨を命ずる期間を記載し、又は記録しなければならない。

Article 211, paragraph (12)

A Commission official may provide a warrant to another Commission official and have that official execute the inspection, search, seizure, or order to provide electronic or magnetic records.

委員会職員は、許可状を他の委員会職員に提供して、臨検、捜索、差押え又は電磁的記録提供命令をさせることができる。

Article 211-2第二百十一条の二

Seizure from a Person That Handles Communications(通信事務を行う者に対する差押え)
Article 211-2, paragraph (1)

If it is necessary for investigating a criminal case, a Commission official may seize a document concerning a postal item, correspondence item, or telegraphic communication sent by or addressed to a suspect in a criminal case, which, based on the provisions of laws and regulations, is stored by or in the possession of a person handling communications, by being issued a warrant.

委員会職員は、犯則事件を調査するため必要があるときは、許可状の発付を受けて、犯則嫌疑者から発し、又は犯則嫌疑者に対して発した郵便物、信書便物若しくは電信についての書類で法令の規定に基づき通信事務を取り扱う者が保管し、又は所持するものを差し押さえることができる。

Article 211-2, paragraph (2)

A Commission official may seize a document concerning a postal item, correspondence item, or telegraphic communication not falling under the preceding paragraph, which, based on the provisions of laws and regulations, is stored by or in the possession of a person handling communications only if there are sufficient circumstances to suppose that the document is related to a criminal case, by being issued a warrant.

委員会職員は、前項の規定に該当しない郵便物、信書便物又は電信についての書類で法令の規定に基づき通信事務を取り扱う者が保管し、又は所持するものについては、犯則事件に関係があると認めるに足りる状況があるものに限り、許可状の発付を受けて、これを差し押さえることができる。

Article 211-2, paragraph (3)

Upon making the disposition under the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, Commission official must notify the sender or recipient to that effect; provided, however, that this does not apply if notifying the sender or recipient is likely to hinder the investigation of the criminal case.

委員会職員は、前二項の規定による処分をした場合においては、その旨を発信人又は受信人に通知しなければならない。ただし、通知することによつて犯則事件の調査が妨げられるおそれがある場合は、この限りでない。

Article 211-3第二百十一条の三

Request for Preservation of Electronic or Magnetic Records of Communications History(通信履歴の電磁的記録の保全要請)
Article 211-3, paragraph (1)

If it is necessary for carrying out the seizure or having electronic or magnetic records provided by an order to provide electronic or magnetic records, a Commission official may specify the necessary electronic or magnetic records from among the electronic or magnetic records of the sender, recipient, date and time, and other communications history, for telecommunications that are recorded in the course of business, and request in writing or by electronic or magnetic record that a person engaged in the business of making equipment to be used for telecommunication available for other persons' communications or a person that has established equipment which is used for telecommunication and that is capable of intermediating the communications of unspecified or many persons for their own business not to erase the specified electronic or magnetic records during a fixed period of no longer than 30 days. In such a case, if the Commission official comes to find that it is no longer necessary to carry out the seizure of the electronic or magnetic records subject to that request or to have those electronic or magnetic records provided by an order to provide electronic or magnetic records, the Commission official must withdraw that request.

委員会職員は、差押えをし、又は電磁的記録提供命令により電磁的記録を提供させるため必要があるときは、電気通信を行うための設備を他人の通信の用に供する事業を営む者又は自己の業務のために不特定若しくは多数の者の通信を媒介することのできる電気通信を行うための設備を設置している者に対し、その業務上記録している電気通信の送信元、送信先、通信日時その他の通信履歴の電磁的記録のうち必要なものを特定し、三十日を超えない期間を定めて、これを消去しないよう、書面により又は電磁的記録により求めることができる。この場合において、当該求めに係る電磁的記録について差押えをし、又は電磁的記録提供命令により当該電磁的記録を提供させる必要がないと認めるに至つたときは、当該求めを取り消さなければならない。

Article 211-3, paragraph (2)

If it is particularly necessary, the period during which the request is made not to erase the records pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph may be extended by a period of no longer than 30 days; provided however, that the period during which the request is made not to erase the records may not exceed 60 days in total.

前項の規定により消去しないよう求める期間については、特に必要があるときは、三十日を超えない範囲内で延長することができる。ただし、消去しないよう求める期間は、通じて六十日を超えることができない。

Article 211-3, paragraph (3)

If it is necessary to do so in making a request under the provisions of paragraph (1), the Commission official may request that the particulars of that request not be divulged without reason.

第一項の規定による求めを行う場合において、必要があるときは、みだりに当該求めに関する事項を漏らさないよう求めることができる。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy