The law as Act Partially Amending the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and the Payment Services Act (Act No. 64 of 2026) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.
The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
Article 178, paragraph (1)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
If the Prime Minister finds that any of the following facts have occurred (or, if the Prime Minister finds that the fact set forth in item (iv)-2 has occurred, excluding the case where an order to pay an administrative monetary penalty is not issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 172-4-2, paragraph (2)), the Prime Minister must issue a decision to commence trial procedures for a case that involves that fact:
a fact that falls under Article 172, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (4) of that Article) or paragraph (3) of that Article;
第百七十二条第一項、第二項(同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)又は第三項に該当する事実
Article 178, paragraph (1), item (ii)(審判手続開始の決定)
a fact that falls under Article 172-2, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (4) of that Article), paragraph (2) of that Article (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5) of that Article), or paragraph (6) of that Article;
a fact that falls under any of the paragraphs of Article 172-3;
第百七十二条の三各項に該当する事実
Article 178, paragraph (1), item (iv)(審判手続開始の決定)
a fact that falls under Article 172-4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of that Article);
第百七十二条の四第一項又は第二項(同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。)に該当する事実
Article 178, paragraph (1), item (iv-2)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Added
a fact that falls under Article 172-4-2, paragraph (1);
第百七十二条の四の二第一項に該当する事実
Article 178, paragraph (1), item (v)(審判手続開始の決定)
a fact that falls under Article 172-5;
第百七十二条の五に該当する事実
Article 178, paragraph (1), item (vi)(審判手続開始の決定)
a fact that falls under Article 172-6, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article);
a fact that falls under Article 174, paragraph (1);
第百七十四条第一項に該当する事実
Article 178, paragraph (1), item (xiv)(審判手続開始の決定)
a fact that falls under Article 174-2, paragraph (1);
第百七十四条の二第一項に該当する事実
Article 178, paragraph (1), item (xv)(審判手続開始の決定)
a fact that falls under Article 174-3, paragraph (1); or
第百七十四条の三第一項に該当する事実
Article 178, paragraph (1), item (xvi)(審判手続開始の決定)
a fact that falls under Article 175, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (9) of that Article) or paragraph (2) of that Article;
a fact which falls under Article 175-2, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (13) of that Article) or paragraph (2) of that Article (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (14) of that Article).
Once the Prime Minister issues a decision to commence trial procedures, the Prime Minister may not decide to commence trial procedures on the grounds that a fact set forth in the item of the preceding paragraph on which that decision is based also falls under other facts set forth in the items of that paragraph.
Article 178, paragraph (3)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the opening day of a public offering or secondary distribution of securities for which a notification under Article 4, paragraph (1) is required, the opening day of a general solicitation involving securities acquired by a qualified institutional investor for which a notification under paragraph (2) of that Article is required, or the opening day of a general solicitation, etc. involving securities acquired by a professional investor, etc. for which a notification under paragraph (3) of that Article is required, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) in connection with that public offering or secondary distribution, general solicitation involving securities acquired by a qualified institutional investor, or general solicitation, etc. involving securities acquired by a professional investor, etc. (limited to a fact that falls under Article 172, paragraph (1)).
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (1) violates the provisions of Article 15, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) in causing the securities specified in that paragraph to be acquired or selling those securities through a public offering or secondary distribution, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) in connection with the Securities that the person causes to be acquired or sells.
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (2) violates the provisions of Article 15, paragraph (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) in selling securities through a secondary distribution without having delivered a prospectus, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) in connection with the securities that the person sells.
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person prescribed in Article 23-8, paragraph (1) violates the provisions of Article 23-8, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) in causing the securities prescribed in that paragraph to be acquired or selling those securities through a public offering or secondary distribution, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) in connection with the securities that the person causes to be acquired or sells.
Once five years have elapsed since the day of submission of a disclosure document for offerings prescribed in Article 172-2, paragraph (3) that contains a false statement about a material particular or that omits a statement as to a material particular that is required to be stated, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (ii) in connection with that disclosure document for offerings.
Once five years have elapsed since the opening day of a secondary distribution under a prospectus that contains a false statement about a material particular provided for in Article 172-2, paragraph (4) or lacks a statement on a material particular provided for in that paragraph that is required to be stated, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (ii) in connection with that Prospectus.
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which the issuer causes securities to be acquired or sells securities through a public offering or secondary distribution without having submitted an amended offering disclosure document, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (ii) in connection with the amended offering disclosure document (limited to a fact that falls under Article 172-2, paragraph (6)).
Once five years have elapsed since the respective due dates for the submission of an annual securities report or semiannual securities report (for the annual securities report prescribed in Article 24, paragraph (3) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (5) of that Article and also including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27), from the day on which any grounds for the submission of the annual securities report arise), the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (iii) in connection with that annual securities report or semiannual securities report.
Once five years have elapsed since the respective days of submission of an annual securities report, etc. or a semiannual securities or extraordinary report, etc. that contains a false statement about a material particular or that omits a statement as to a material particular that is required to be stated, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (iv) in connection with that annual securities report, etc. or semiannual securities or extraordinary report, etc.
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which any ground for the submission of an extraordinary report arises, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (iv) in connection with that extraordinary report (limited to the fact which falls under Article 172-4, paragraph (2), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of that Article).
Article 178, paragraph (13)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once fiveseven years have elapsed since the day on which a purchase, etc. of share certificates, etc. or listed share certificates, etc. violatesaudit certification was given treating specified non-financial information to be stated in the provisions of Article 27-3, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2, paragraph (2)) covered disclosure document of a specified submitter, in being conducted withoutwhich a public notice of the commencement of a tender offer having been givenstatement is false or missing, as being neither false nor missing, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (v)iv)-2 in connection with that purchase, etcaudit certification.
Article 178, paragraph (14)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the day of issuance of public noticeon which a purchase, etc. of the commencement of a tender offershare certificates, etc. or listed share certificates, etc. which contains a false representation about a material particular or which omits a representation asviolates the provisions of Article 27-3, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to a material particular that is required to be representedArticle 27-22-2, paragraph (2)) in being conducted without a public notice of the commencement of a tender offer having been given, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (viv) in connection with that public notice for commencement of tender offerpurchase, etc.
Article 178, paragraph (15)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the day of submissionissuance of public notice of the commencement of a tender offer statement, etc. thatwhich contains a false statementrepresentation about a material particular or thatwhich omits a statementrepresentation as to a material particular that is required to be statedrepresented, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (vi) in connection with that public notice of the commencement of a tender offer statement, etc.
Article 178, paragraph (16)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the due date for theday of submission of an amendeda tender offer statement, etc. (or, for an amendedthat contains a false statement under Article 27-8, paragraph (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2, paragraph (2))about a material particular or an amended report under Article 27-8, paragraph (2)that omits a statement as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10, paragraph (12), from the day on which any ground for the submission of any of these documents arises)a material particular that is required to be stated, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (vi) in connection with that amended tender offer statement, etc. (limited to a fact that falls under Article 172-6, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article).
Article 178, paragraph (17)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the due date for the submission of a an amended tender offer statement of large-volume holdings , etc. (or, for an amended statement under Article 27-8, paragraph (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2, paragraph (2)) or changes, an amended report under Article 27-8, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10, paragraph (12), from the day on which any ground for the submission of any of these documents arises), the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (vii) involving vi) in connection with that amended tender offer statement of large-volume holdings or changes, etc. (limited to a fact that falls under Article 172-6, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article).
Article 178, paragraph (18)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person submitsdue date for the submission of a statement of large-volume holdings or changes, etc. that contains a false statement about a material particular or that omits a statement as to a material particular that is required to be stated, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (viii) in connection withvii) involving that statement of large-volume holdings or statement of changes, etc.
Article 178, paragraph (19)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person commencessubmits a specified solicitationstatement of large-volume holdings or changes, etc. that contains a false statement about a material particular or that omits a statement as to a material particular that is required to be stated, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (ixviii) in connection with that specified solicitationstatement of large-volume holdings or changes, etc.
Article 178, paragraph (20)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person provides or disclosescommences a specified information on securities, etc. that contains a falsitysolicitation, etc., the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xix) in connection with that specified information on securities, etc. that contains a falsehoodsolicitation, etc.
Article 178, paragraph (21)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person provides or discloses specified information on the issuersecurities, etc. that contains a falsityfalsehood, etc., the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xix) in connection with that Information on the issuerspecified information on securities, etc. that contains a falsityfalsehood, etc.
Article 178, paragraph (22)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
When sevenOnce five years have elapsed fromsince the day when on which a person submitting disclosure documents, etc. prescribed in Article 172-12, paragraph (1) submitted, provided or publicly announced the fake disclosure documentsprovides or discloses information on the issuer, etc. that contains a falsehood, etc. prescribed in that paragraph, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision on the commencement ofto commence trial procedures concerning based on the facts specified occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xi)-2 related to in connection with that information on the relevant fake disclosure documentsissuer, etc. that contains a falsehood, etc.
Article 178, paragraph (23)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once fiveWhen seven years have elapsed sincefrom the day on which the violation set forth when a person submitting disclosure documents, etc. prescribed in Article 173172-12, paragraph (1) ends, submitted, provided or publicly announced the fake disclosure documents, etc. prescribed in that paragraph, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrencecommencement of the fact set forth trial procedures concerning the facts specified in paragraph (1), item (xii) in connection with that violationxi)-2 related to the relevant fake disclosure documents, etc.
Article 178, paragraph (24)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which the violation prescribed in Article 174173, paragraph (1) ends, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xiiixii) in connection with that violation.
Article 178, paragraph (25)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which the violation prescribed in Article 174-2174, paragraph (1) ends, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xivxiii) in connection with that violation.
Article 178, paragraph (26)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a violation prescribed in Article 174-3174-2, paragraph (1) ends, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xvxiv) in connection with that violation.
Article 178, paragraph (27)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a purchase and sale, etc. prescribedthe violation set forth in Article 166174-3, paragraph (1) is conductedends, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xvixv) in connection with that purchase and sale, etcviolation.
Article 178, paragraph (28)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a purchase, etc. of specified share certificates, etc. or related share certificates and sale, etc. prescribed in Article 167166, paragraph (1) or a sale, etc. of share certificates, etc. prescribed in that paragraph is madeconducted, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xvi) in connection with that purchase, etc. or and sale, etc.
Article 178, paragraph (29)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Changed
WhenOnce five years have elapsed fromsince the day when the violation on which a purchase, etc. of specified share certificates, etc. or related share certificates, etc. prescribed in Article 175-2167, paragraph (1) or (2) or the specified acta sale, etc. of providing informationshare certificates, etc. prescribed in paragraph (13) or (14) of that Article was conductedparagraph is made, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision on the commencement ofto commence trial procedures concerning based on the facts specified occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (xvii) related to the violation or the specified act of providing informationxvi) in connection with that purchase, etc. or sale, etc.
Article 178, paragraph (30)(審判手続開始の決定)(Decision to Commence Trial Procedures)Added
When five years have elapsed from the day when the violation prescribed in Article 175-2, paragraph (1) or (2) or the specified act of providing information, etc. prescribed in paragraph (13) or (14) of that Article was conducted, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision on the commencement of trial procedures concerning the facts specified in paragraph (1), item (xvii) related to the violation or the specified act of providing information, etc.
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a purchase, etc. of share certificates, etc. or listed share certificates, etc. violates the provisions of Article 27-3, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2, paragraph (2)) in being conducted without a public notice of the commencement of a tender offer having being given, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (iv) in connection with that purchase, etc.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 68 of 2022 (令和四年法律第六十八号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Once five years have elapsed since the due date for the submission of an amended tender offer statement, etc. (or, for an amended statement under Article 27-8, paragraph (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2, paragraph (2)) or an amended report under Article 27-8, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10, paragraph (12), from the day on which any ground for the submission of any of these documents arises), the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (iv) in connection with that amended tender offer statement, etc. (limited to a fact that falls under Article 172-6, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article).
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 68 of 2022 (令和四年法律第六十八号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Once five years have elapsed since the due date for the submission of a statement of large-volume holdings or changes, the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (iv) involving that statement of large-volume holdings or changes.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 68 of 2022 (令和四年法律第六十八号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Once five years have elapsed since the day on which a person provides or discloses specified information on securities, etc. that contains a falsity, etc., the Prime Minister may not issue a decision to commence trial procedures based on the occurrence of the fact set forth in paragraph (1), item (x) in connection with that specified information on securities, etc. that contains a flasehood, etc.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 68 of 2022 (令和四年法律第六十八号)