Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

Its wordings

Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act

Article 3-11, paragraph (3)

第三条の十一第三項

Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today

How the changes are shown

Underlined: words the amendment adds. A bar: where it removes words.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.

  1. In force today

    Beyond the case prescribed in paragraph (1), the court has jurisdiction over an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the administration of an estate for a period before a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or a ruling to revoke such ruling becomes final and binding (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (88); the same applies in Article 189, paragraphs (1) and (2)), an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the preservation of an estate (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in row (89) of that table; the same applies in Article 190-2), an adjudication case for the appointment of a liquidator of the estate upon acceptance of the qualified acceptance of inheritance (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in row (94) of that table), an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the administration of an estate after a request for the separation of patrimony (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matter set forth in row (97) of that table; the same applies in Article 202, paragraph (1), item (ii) and paragraph (3)), and an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the liquidation of an estate in the event of the nonexistence of an heir (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in row (99) of that table; the same applies hereinafter) if the property that belongs to the estate exists in Japan.

    裁判所は、第一項に規定する場合のほか、推定相続人の廃除の審判又はその取消しの審判の確定前の遺産の管理に関する処分の審判事件(別表第一の八十八の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。第百八十九条第一項及び第二項において同じ。)、相続財産の保存に関する処分の審判事件(同表の八十九の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。第百九十条の二において同じ。)、限定承認を受理した場合における相続財産の清算人の選任の審判事件(同表の九十四の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)、財産分離の請求後の相続財産の管理に関する処分の審判事件(同表の九十七の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。第二百二条第一項第二号及び第三項において同じ。)及び相続人の不存在の場合における相続財産の清算に関する処分の審判事件(同表の九十九の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。以下同じ。)について、相続財産に属する財産が日本国内にあるときは、管轄権を有する。

  2. Not yet in force Act No. 45 of 2026 Moved to Article 3-12, paragraph (3); its words stay the same

Compare any two wordings