Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act
Article 3-10, paragraph (1)
第三条の十第一項
Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today
In force today
The court has jurisdiction over an adjudication case regarding the duty to support arising from family relationships such as the relationship between a husband and wife or between parents and their child (meaning adjudication cases regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, rows (84) and (85) and Appended Table 2, rows (1) through (3), (9), and (10) (in an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 2, row (3), limited to an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the sharing of expenses required for the custody of a child)) if a person under a duty to support (in an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (84), a person who is to be a person under a duty to support) who is not the petitioner or a person entitled to support (in an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the sharing of expenses required for the custody of a child, the person who has custody of the child, or the child) is domiciled in Japan (or resides in Japan if the person or child has no domicile or the person's or child's domicile is unknown).
裁判所は、夫婦、親子その他の親族関係から生ずる扶養の義務に関する審判事件（別表第一の八十四の項及び八十五の項並びに別表第二の一の項から三の項まで、九の項及び十の項の事項についての審判事件（同表の三の項の事項についての審判事件にあっては、子の監護に要する費用の分担に関する処分の審判事件に限る。）をいう。）について、扶養義務者（別表第一の八十四の項の事項についての審判事件にあっては、扶養義務者となるべき者）であって申立人でないもの又は扶養権利者（子の監護に要する費用の分担に関する処分の審判事件にあっては、子の監護者又は子）の住所（住所がない場合又は住所が知れない場合には、居所）が日本国内にあるときは、管轄権を有する。