Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act
Article 189, paragraph (2)
第百八十九条第二項
Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today
In force today
The provisions of Article 125, paragraphs (1) through (6) apply mutatis mutandis to an administrator appointed in an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the administration of an estate for a period before a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or a ruling to revoke the ruling becomes final and binding. In this case, the term "family court" in paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of the Article is deemed to be replaced with "court that has ordered a disposition regarding the administration of an estate for a period before a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or a ruling to revoke the ruling becomes final and binding", and the phrase "property of an adult under guardianship" in paragraph (3) of the Article is deemed to be replaced with "estate".
第百二十五条第一項から第六項までの規定は、推定相続人の廃除の審判又はその取消しの審判の確定前の遺産の管理に関する処分の審判事件において選任した管理人について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項、第二項及び第四項中「家庭裁判所」とあるのは「推定相続人の廃除の審判又はその取消しの審判の確定前の遺産の管理に関する処分を命じた裁判所」と、同条第三項中「成年被後見人の財産」とあるのは「遺産」と読み替えるものとする。
The provisions of Article
125173, paragraphs (1) through (6) apply mutatis mutandis to an administrator appointed in an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the administration of an estate for a period before a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or a ruling to revoke the ruling becomes final and binding. In this case, the term "family court" in paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of the Article is deemed to be replaced with "court that has ordered a disposition regarding the administration of an estate for a period before a ruling of the disinheritance of a presumptive heir or a ruling to revoke the ruling becomes final and binding", and the phrase "property ofan adult under guardianshipthe child" in paragraph (3) of the Article is deemed to be replaced with "estate".第百二十五条第百七十三条第一項から第六項までの規定は、推定相続人の廃除の審判又はその取消しの審判の確定前の遺産の管理に関する処分の審判事件において選任した管理人について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項、第二項及び第四項中「家庭裁判所」とあるのは「推定相続人の廃除の審判又はその取消しの審判の確定前の遺産の管理に関する処分を命じた裁判所」と、同条第三項中「成年被後見人子の財産」とあるのは「遺産」と読み替えるものとする。