Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act
Article 123-2, paragraph (1)
第百二十三条の二第一項
Each amendment that changed this provision, and each that will, oldest first. Each is shown against the wording just before it; where an amendment gives the provision another number, it is followed under the new one. Read it as it stands today
In force today
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 89, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 96, paragraph (1) and Article 98, paragraph (1)), in an adjudication case for the commission of, or the rescission or change of the commission of, delivery of a postal item, etc. addressed to an adult under guardianship, the court in charge of an appeal is not required to hear statements of a person engaged in the correspondence delivery service.
成年被後見人に宛てた郵便物等の配達の嘱託等の審判事件においては、第八十九条第一項の規定（第九十六条第一項及び第九十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）にかかわらず、抗告裁判所は、信書の送達の事業を行う者の陳述を聴くことを要しない。
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 89, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 96, paragraph (1) and Article 98, paragraph (1)), in an adjudication case for the commission of, or the rescission or change of the commission of, delivery of a postal item, etc. addressed to an adult under guardianship, the court in charge of an appeal is not required to hear statements of a person engaged in the correspondence delivery service.成年被後見人に宛てた郵便物等の配達の嘱託等の審判事件においては、第八十九条第一項の規定（第九十六条第一項及び第九十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）にかかわらず、抗告裁判所は、信書の送達の事業を行う者の陳述を聴くことを要しない。