Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt by 31 March 2027, on a day set by — at the latest in 5 months

Read the text in force →

Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade

私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律(してきどくせんのきんしおよびこうせいとりひきのかくほにかんするほうりつ)

Chapter VII Injunctions and Damages

The law as Act Partially Amending the Code of Criminal Procedure, etc. to Respond to Advances in Information and Communications Technology, etc. (Act No. 39 of 2025) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

How the changes are shown

Underlined: words the amendment adds. A bar: where it removes words.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.

Chapter VII Injunctions and Damages第七章 差止請求及び損害賠償

Article 24第二十四条

Article 24, paragraph (1)

A person whose interests are infringed upon or likely to be infringed upon by an act in violation of the provisions of Article 8, item (v) or Article 19 and who is thereby suffering or likely to suffer extreme damage is entitled to seek the suspension or prevention of the infringements from an enterprise or a trade association that infringes upon or is likely to infringe upon the interests.

第八条第五号又は第十九条の規定に違反する行為によつてその利益を侵害され、又は侵害されるおそれがある者は、これにより著しい損害を生じ、又は生ずるおそれがあるときは、その利益を侵害する事業者若しくは事業者団体又は侵害するおそれがある事業者若しくは事業者団体に対し、その侵害の停止又は予防を請求することができる。

Article 25第二十五条

Article 25, paragraph (1)

An enterprise that has committed an act in violation of the provisions of Articles 3, 6, or 19 (for an enterprise that has committed acts in violation of the provisions of Article 6, limited to an enterprise that has effected unreasonable restraint of trade or employed unfair trade practices in the international agreement or contract concerned) and any trade association that has committed an act in violation of the provisions of Article 8 is liable for damages suffered by another party.

第三条、第六条又は第十九条の規定に違反する行為をした事業者(第六条の規定に違反する行為をした事業者にあつては、当該国際的協定又は国際的契約において、不当な取引制限をし、又は不公正な取引方法を自ら用いた事業者に限る。)及び第八条の規定に違反する行為をした事業者団体は、被害者に対し、損害賠償の責めに任ずる。

Article 25, paragraph (2)

No enterprise or trade association may be exempted from the liability provided in the preceding paragraph by proving the non-existence of intention or negligence on its part.

事業者及び事業者団体は、故意又は過失がなかつたことを証明して、前項に規定する責任を免れることができない。

Article 26第二十六条

Article 26, paragraph (1)

The right to claim damages under the provisions of the preceding Article may not be asserted in court until the cease and desist order provided for in the provisions of Article 49 (if no such order has been issued, the payment order provided in Article 62, paragraph (1) (excluding those issued against an enterprise that constitutes a trade association that has committed an act in violation of the provisions of Article 8, item (i) or (ii))) has become final and binding.

前条の規定による損害賠償の請求権は、第四十九条に規定する排除措置命令(排除措置命令がされなかつた場合にあつては、第六十二条第一項に規定する納付命令(第八条第一号又は第二号の規定に違反する行為をした事業者団体の構成事業者に対するものを除く。))が確定した後でなければ、裁判上主張することができない。

Article 26, paragraph (2)

The right set forth in the preceding paragraph expires by prescription after a lapse of three years from the date on which the cease and desist order or the payment order set forth in the paragraph became final and binding.

前項の請求権は、同項の排除措置命令又は納付命令が確定した日から三年を経過したときは、時効によつて消滅する。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy