Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 192

第百九十二条

When any right of retention under the provisions of the Commercial Code or the Companies Act exists against the property that belongs to the bankruptcy estate at the time of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, if the property is necessary for the business continued pursuant to the provisions of Article 36 or the recovery of the property otherwise contributes to maintaining or increasing the value of the bankruptcy estate, a bankruptcy trustee may make a demand to the holder of the right of retention that the right be extinguished.

破産手続開始の時において破産財団に属する財産につき商法又は会社法の規定による留置権がある場合において、当該財産が第三十六条の規定により継続されている事業に必要なものであるとき、その他当該財産の回復が破産財団の価値の維持又は増加に資するときは、破産管財人は、留置権者に対して、当該留置権の消滅を請求することができる。

In order to make a demand under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the amount of money equivalent to the value of the property referred to in that paragraph must be paid to the holder of the right of retention referred to in that paragraph.

前項の規定による請求をするには、同項の財産の価額に相当する金銭を、同項の留置権者に弁済しなければならない。

Permission of the court must be obtained in order to make a demand under the provisions of paragraph (1) and to make a payment prescribed in the preceding paragraph.

第一項の規定による請求及び前項に規定する弁済をするには、裁判所の許可を得なければならない。

If the permission referred to in the preceding paragraph is granted and the amount of payment prescribed in paragraph (2) is sufficient to cover the value of the property referred to in paragraph (1), the right of retention referred to in that paragraph is extinguished at the time when the payment is made or at the time when a demand under the provisions of paragraph (1) is made, whichever occurs later.

前項の許可があった場合における第二項に規定する弁済の額が第一項の財産の価額を満たすときは、当該弁済の時又は同項の規定による請求の時のいずれか遅い時に、同項の留置権は消滅する。

In an action to request the return of the property stated in paragraph (1) on the grounds that the right of retention referred to in that paragraph is extinguished pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, even if the amount of payment prescribed in paragraph (2) is not sufficient to cover the value of the property, upon the plaintiff's petition and when the court in charge of the action finds it appropriate, the court may order the holder of the right of retention referred to in paragraph (1) to return the property, on the condition that the amount of any shortage is to be paid within a reasonable period of time.

前項の規定により第一項の留置権が消滅したことを原因とする同項の財産の返還を求める訴訟においては、第二項に規定する弁済の額が当該財産の価額を満たさない場合においても、原告の申立てがあり、当該訴訟の受訴裁判所が相当と認めるときは、当該受訴裁判所は、相当の期間内に不足額を弁済することを条件として、第一項の留置権者に対して、当該財産を返還することを命ずることができる。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy