Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

11 articles

Article 79Partial Disclosure

第七十九条(部分開示)

If non-disclosure information is included in personal information an administrative entity holds that is subject to a request for disclosure, and it is possible to easily separate and exclude the part that constitutes non-disclosure information from the personal information, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity must disclose the part from which the part that constitutes non-disclosure information has been excluded to the person requesting disclosure.

行政機関の長等は、開示請求に係る保有個人情報に不開示情報が含まれている場合において、不開示情報に該当する部分を容易に区分して除くことができるときは、開示請求者に対し、当該部分を除いた部分につき開示しなければならない。

If the information set forth in paragraph (1), item (ii) of the preceding Article (limited to information that can be used to identify a specific individual other than the person requesting disclosure) is included in personal information an administrative entity holds that is subject to a request for disclosure, and it is found that disclosure of the information would not be likely to cause damage to the rights and interests of a person other than the person requesting disclosure if the part in the information that constitutes a name, date of birth, or other identifiers or their equivalent that can be used to identify a specific individual other than the person requesting disclosure, or that constitutes an individual identification code were excluded from that information, the other part in the information from which the part mentioned above has been excluded is deemed not to be included in the information set forth in that item, and the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply to it.

開示請求に係る保有個人情報に前条第一項第二号の情報(開示請求者以外の特定の個人を識別することができるものに限る。)が含まれている場合において、当該情報のうち、氏名、生年月日その他の開示請求者以外の特定の個人を識別することができることとなる記述等及び個人識別符号の部分を除くことにより、開示しても、開示請求者以外の個人の権利利益が害されるおそれがないと認められるときは、当該部分を除いた部分は、同号の情報に含まれないものとみなして、前項の規定を適用する。

Article 80Discretionary Disclosure

第八十条(裁量的開示)

Even if non-disclosure information is included in personal information an administrative entity holds that is subject to a request for disclosure, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity may disclose the personal information the administrative entity holds to the person requesting disclosure, if they finds it particularly necessary to do so for protecting the individual rights and interests.

行政機関の長等は、開示請求に係る保有個人情報に不開示情報が含まれている場合であっても、個人の権利利益を保護するため特に必要があると認めるときは、開示請求者に対し、当該保有個人情報を開示することができる。

Article 81Information on the Existence of Personal Information an Administrative Entity Holds

第八十一条(保有個人情報の存否に関する情報)

If non-disclosure information is supposed to be disclosed by merely answering whether or not personal information an administrative entity holds that is subject to a request for disclosure exists, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity may refuse the request for disclosure, without making the existence or non-existence of that personal information clear.

開示請求に対し、当該開示請求に係る保有個人情報が存在しているか否かを答えるだけで、不開示情報を開示することとなるときは、行政機関の長等は、当該保有個人情報の存否を明らかにしないで、当該開示請求を拒否することができる。

Article 82Measures on Requests for Disclosure

第八十二条(開示請求に対する措置)

When disclosing all or a part of personal information an administrative entity holds that is subject to a request for disclosure, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity must make a decision to that effect, and notify the person requesting disclosure of that decision, the purpose of use of that personal information to be disclosed, and matters specified by Cabinet Order relating to the implementation of disclosure in writing; provided, however, that this does not apply to the purpose of use in cases that fall under Article 62, item (ii) or item (iii).

行政機関の長等は、開示請求に係る保有個人情報の全部又は一部を開示するときは、その旨の決定をし、開示請求者に対し、その旨、開示する保有個人情報の利用目的及び開示の実施に関し政令で定める事項を書面により通知しなければならない。ただし、第六十二条第二号又は第三号に該当する場合における当該利用目的については、この限りでない。

If an administrative organ's head or administrative entity decides not to disclose any personal information the administrative entity holds that is subject to a request for disclosure (this includes the cases in which the administrative organ's head or administrative entity refuses a request for disclosure pursuant to the provisions of the preceding Article or does not hold that personal information), the administrative organ's head or administrative entity must notify the person requesting disclosure to that effect in writing.

行政機関の長等は、開示請求に係る保有個人情報の全部を開示しないとき(前条の規定により開示請求を拒否するとき、及び開示請求に係る保有個人情報を保有していないときを含む。)は、開示をしない旨の決定をし、開示請求者に対し、その旨を書面により通知しなければならない。

Article 83Due Date of a Decisions on Disclosure

第八十三条(開示決定等の期限)

Decisions on disclosure must be made within thirty days from the date of the request for disclosure; provided, however, that if an amendment is requested pursuant to the provisions of Article 77, paragraph (3), the number of days required for the amendment is not included within that period of time.

開示決定等は、開示請求があった日から三十日以内にしなければならない。ただし、第七十七条第三項の規定により補正を求めた場合にあっては、当該補正に要した日数は、当該期間に算入しない。

Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, if there are justifiable grounds such as difficulties arising from conducting processes, an administrative organ's head or administrative entity may extend the period of time prescribed in that paragraph for up to thirty days. In this case, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity must notify the person requesting disclosure in writing of the extended period and the grounds for the extension, without delay.

前項の規定にかかわらず、行政機関の長等は、事務処理上の困難その他正当な理由があるときは、同項に規定する期間を三十日以内に限り延長することができる。この場合において、行政機関の長等は、開示請求者に対し、遅滞なく、延長後の期間及び延長の理由を書面により通知しなければならない。

Article 84Exception to the Due Date for Decisions on Disclosure

第八十四条(開示決定等の期限の特例)

Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding Article, if there is a considerably large amount of personal information an administrative entity holds that is subject to a request for disclosure, and there would be a risk that the performance of duties is considerably hindered if a decision on disclosure were made on all of those requests within sixty days from the date of a request for disclosure, it is sufficient for the administrative organ's head or administrative entity to make a decision on disclosure for a reasonable portion of the personal information the administrative entity holds for which disclosure has been requested within that period of time, and to make a decision on disclosure for the remaining personal information within a reasonable period of time. In this case, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity must notify the person requesting disclosure of the following matters in writing within the period of time prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article:

開示請求に係る保有個人情報が著しく大量であるため、開示請求があった日から六十日以内にその全てについて開示決定等をすることにより事務の遂行に著しい支障が生ずるおそれがある場合には、前条の規定にかかわらず、行政機関の長等は、開示請求に係る保有個人情報のうちの相当の部分につき当該期間内に開示決定等をし、残りの保有個人情報については相当の期間内に開示決定等をすれば足りる。この場合において、行政機関の長等は、同条第一項に規定する期間内に、開示請求者に対し、次に掲げる事項を書面により通知しなければならない。

the application of this Article and the grounds for its application;

この条の規定を適用する旨及びその理由

残りの保有個人情報について開示決定等をする期限

Article 85Transfer of Cases

第八十五条(事案の移送)

An administrative organ's head or administrative entity may transfer the case to another head or entity upon consulting with them, if the personal information the administrative entity holds that is subject to a request for disclosure has been provided by an administrative entity other than one to which the head or entity in question belongs, or there are justifiable grounds for that other head or entity to make a decision on disclosure. In this case, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity that has transferred the case must notify the person requesting disclosure in writing to the effect that the case has been transferred.

行政機関の長等は、開示請求に係る保有個人情報が当該行政機関の長等が属する行政機関等以外の行政機関等から提供されたものであるとき、その他他の行政機関の長等において開示決定等をすることにつき正当な理由があるときは、当該他の行政機関の長等と協議の上、当該他の行政機関の長等に対し、事案を移送することができる。この場合においては、移送をした行政機関の長等は、開示請求者に対し、事案を移送した旨を書面により通知しなければならない。

If a case has been transferred pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, an administrative organ's head or administrative entity to which the case has been transferred must make a decision on disclosure in relation to the relevant request for disclosure. In this case, actions that the administrative organ's head or administrative entity that has transferred the case has made prior to the transfer are deemed to be those that the administrative organ's head or administrative entity to which the case has been transferred has made.

前項の規定により事案が移送されたときは、移送を受けた行政機関の長等において、当該開示請求についての開示決定等をしなければならない。この場合において、移送をした行政機関の長等が移送前にした行為は、移送を受けた行政機関の長等がしたものとみなす。

In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, if the administrative organ's head or administrative entity to which the case has been transferred makes a decision set forth in Article 82, paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as a "decision to disclose" in this Section), the administrative organ's head or administrative entity must implement the disclosure. In this case, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity that has transferred the case must cooperate as necessary in the implementation of that disclosure.

前項の場合において、移送を受けた行政機関の長等が第八十二条第一項の決定(以下この節において「開示決定」という。)をしたときは、当該行政機関の長等は、開示の実施をしなければならない。この場合において、移送をした行政機関の長等は、当該開示の実施に必要な協力をしなければならない。

Article 86Granting Third Parties an Opportunity to Submit a Written Opinion

第八十六条(第三者に対する意見書提出の機会の付与等)

If information on a person other than the State, an incorporated administrative agency or other prescribed corporation, a local government, a local incorporated administrative agency, or a person requesting disclosure (hereinafter referred to as a "third party" in this Article, Article 105, paragraph (2), item (iii), and Article 107, paragraph (1)) is included in the personal information an administrative entity holds that is subject to a request for disclosure, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity may notify the third party of the content of the information on that third party, and other matters specified by Cabinet Order, and may grant an opportunity to submit a written opinion, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order, when making a decision on disclosure.

開示請求に係る保有個人情報に国、独立行政法人等、地方公共団体、地方独立行政法人及び開示請求者以外の者(以下この条、第百五条第二項第三号及び第百七条第一項において「第三者」という。)に関する情報が含まれているときは、行政機関の長等は、開示決定等をするに当たって、当該情報に係る第三者に対し、政令で定めるところにより、当該第三者に関する情報の内容その他政令で定める事項を通知して、意見書を提出する機会を与えることができる。

In the cases that fall under any of the following items, before making a decision to disclose, an administrative organ's head or administrative entity must notify the third party in writing of the content of the information on the third party that is subject to a request for disclosure and other matters specified by Cabinet Order, and grant that third party an opportunity to submit a written opinion, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order; provided, however, that this does not apply to cases in which the third party's location is unknown:

行政機関の長等は、次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、開示決定に先立ち、当該第三者に対し、政令で定めるところにより、開示請求に係る当該第三者に関する情報の内容その他政令で定める事項を書面により通知して、意見書を提出する機会を与えなければならない。ただし、当該第三者の所在が判明しない場合は、この限りでない。

personal information an administrative entity holds that contains information on a third party is to be disclosed, and it is found that the information on that third party falls under the information prescribed in Article 78, paragraph (1), item (ii), (b) or in the proviso of item (iii) of that paragraph;

第三者に関する情報が含まれている保有個人情報を開示しようとする場合であって、当該第三者に関する情報が第七十八条第一項第二号ロ又は同項第三号ただし書に規定する情報に該当すると認められるとき。

personal information an administrative entity holds that contains information on a third party is to be disclosed pursuant to the provisions of Article 80.

第三者に関する情報が含まれている保有個人情報を第八十条の規定により開示しようとするとき。

If the third party that was granted an opportunity to submit a written opinion pursuant to the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs has submitted a written opinion manifesting the intention to oppose disclosure of the information concerning the third party, but the administrative organ's head or administrative entity makes a decision to disclose, the head or entity must place at least two weeks between the day of the decision to disclose and the day on which the disclosure will be implemented. In this case, upon making the decision to disclose, the administrative organ's head or administrative entity must immediately notify the third party that submitted that written opinion (referred to as a "written opposition opinion" in Article 105) in writing to the effect that the decision to disclose was made, of the grounds for its decision, and of the date on which the disclosure will be implemented.

行政機関の長等は、前二項の規定により意見書の提出の機会を与えられた第三者が当該第三者に関する情報の開示に反対の意思を表示した意見書を提出した場合において、開示決定をするときは、開示決定の日と開示を実施する日との間に少なくとも二週間を置かなければならない。この場合において、行政機関の長等は、開示決定後直ちに、当該意見書(第百五条において「反対意見書」という。)を提出した第三者に対し、開示決定をした旨及びその理由並びに開示を実施する日を書面により通知しなければならない。

Article 87Implementing Disclosure

第八十七条(開示の実施)

The disclosure of personal information an administrative entity holds is implemented through inspection or by the delivery of copies, if that personal information is contained in the form of documents or drawings; or by means designated by the administrative organ's head or administrative entity in consideration of the type of the record, the state of its digitalization, and other factors, if that personal information is contained in the electronic or magnetic records; provided, however, that if disclosure of personal information an administrative entity holds is to be implemented through inspection, and if the administrative organ's head or administrative entity finds that inspection of the original material is likely to hinder the preservation of the documents or pictures that contain the personal information, or there are other justifiable grounds for doing so, the disclosure of the personal information may be implemented through inspection of a copy of the documents or drawings.

保有個人情報の開示は、当該保有個人情報が、文書又は図画に記録されているときは閲覧又は写しの交付により、電磁的記録に記録されているときはその種別、情報化の進展状況等を勘案して行政機関等が定める方法により行う。ただし、閲覧の方法による保有個人情報の開示にあっては、行政機関の長等は、当該保有個人情報が記録されている文書又は図画の保存に支障を生ずるおそれがあると認めるとき、その他正当な理由があるときは、その写しにより、これを行うことができる。

An administrative entity must make its rules on the means of disclosure for electronic or magnetic records based on the preceding paragraph available for public inspection.

行政機関等は、前項の規定に基づく電磁的記録についての開示の方法に関する定めを一般の閲覧に供しなければならない。

A person to whom personal information an administrative entity holds is disclosed based upon a decision to disclose must indicate the means of implementing the disclosure that the person requests and other matters prescribed by Cabinet Order to the administrative organ's head or administrative entity that has made the decision to disclose, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order.

開示決定に基づき保有個人情報の開示を受ける者は、政令で定めるところにより、当該開示決定をした行政機関の長等に対し、その求める開示の実施の方法その他の政令で定める事項を申し出なければならない。

The indication under the preceding paragraph must be made within thirty days from the date of the notice prescribed in Article 82, paragraph (1); provided, however, this does not apply if there are justifiable grounds for being unable to make the indication within that period of time.

前項の規定による申出は、第八十二条第一項に規定する通知があった日から三十日以内にしなければならない。ただし、当該期間内に当該申出をすることができないことにつき正当な理由があるときは、この限りでない。

Article 88Coordination with Disclosure Implemented by Other Laws and Regulations

第八十八条(他の法令による開示の実施との調整)

Notwithstanding the main clause of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, if personal information an administrative entity holds that is subject to a request for disclosure is to be disclosed to the person requesting disclosure by the same means as those prescribed in the main clause of that paragraph pursuant to the provisions of other laws and regulations (only within the period of time for disclosure, if it is specified), the administrative organ's head or administrative entity does not disclose the personal information the administrative entity holds by that same means; provided, however, that this does not apply when there are those provisions in other laws and regulations to the effect that disclosure is not implemented in certain cases.

行政機関の長等は、他の法令の規定により、開示請求者に対し開示請求に係る保有個人情報が前条第一項本文に規定する方法と同一の方法で開示することとされている場合(開示の期間が定められている場合にあっては、当該期間内に限る。)には、同項本文の規定にかかわらず、当該保有個人情報については、当該同一の方法による開示を行わない。ただし、当該他の法令の規定に一定の場合には開示をしない旨の定めがあるときは、この限りでない。

If the means of disclosure designated by the provisions of other laws and regulations is public inspection, that public inspection is deemed to be inspection referred to in the main clause of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, and the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply.

他の法令の規定に定める開示の方法が縦覧であるときは、当該縦覧を前条第一項本文の閲覧とみなして、前項の規定を適用する。

Article 89Fees

第八十九条(手数料)

A person that makes a request for disclosure to the head of an administrative organ must pay a fee prescribed by Cabinet Order within the actual cost, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Order.

行政機関の長に対し開示請求をする者は、政令で定めるところにより、実費の範囲内において政令で定める額の手数料を納めなければならない。

A person that makes a request for disclosure to a local government organ must pay a fee specified by local ordinance within the actual cost, as prescribed by local ordinance.

地方公共団体の機関に対し開示請求をする者は、条例で定めるところにより、実費の範囲内において条例で定める額の手数料を納めなければならない。

When the amount of the fee referred to in the preceding two paragraphs is established, consideration must be given to making the amount as affordable as possible.

前二項の手数料の額を定めるに当たっては、できる限り利用しやすい額とするよう配慮しなければならない。

A person that makes a request for disclosure to an incorporated administrative agency or other prescribed corporation must pay a fee specified by the incorporated administrative agency or other prescribed corporation.

独立行政法人等に対し開示請求をする者は、独立行政法人等の定めるところにより、手数料を納めなければならない。

An incorporated administrative agency or other prescribed corporation specifies the amount of the fee referred to in the preceding paragraph within the actual cost, taking the amount of the fee referred to in paragraph (1) into consideration.

前項の手数料の額は、実費の範囲内において、かつ、第一項の手数料の額を参酌して、独立行政法人等が定める。

An incorporated administrative agency or other prescribed corporation must make the rules under the preceding two paragraphs available for general inspection.

独立行政法人等は、前二項の規定による定めを一般の閲覧に供しなければならない。

A person that makes a request for disclosure to a local incorporated administrative agency must pay a fee specified by the local incorporated administrative agency.

地方独立行政法人に対し開示請求をする者は、地方独立行政法人の定めるところにより、手数料を納めなければならない。

A local incorporated administrative agency specifies the amount of the fee referred to in the preceding paragraph within the actual cost, taking the amount of the fee referred to in paragraph (2) into consideration.

前項の手数料の額は、実費の範囲内において、かつ、第二項の条例で定める手数料の額を参酌して、地方独立行政法人が定める。

A local incorporated administrative agency must make the rules under the preceding two paragraphs available for general inspection.

地方独立行政法人は、前二項の規定による定めを一般の閲覧に供しなければならない。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy