Article 77Rescission of Appointment as service provider

二when it is found that a Designated In-Home Service Provider has violated the conditions attached upon granting said appointment as service provider pursuant to Article 70, paragraph (9) or (11);

三when a Designated In-Home Service Provider becomes unable to meet the standards as determined by Prefectural Ordinance as set forth in Article 74, paragraph (1) or the number of employees as determined by Prefectural Ordinance as set forth in the same paragraph with regard to knowledge, skill, or number of employees of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider;

四when a Designated In-Home Service Provider becomes unable to operate an appropriate Designated In-Home Service Business in accordance with standards concerning Facilities and Management of a Designated In-Home Service Business as prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (2);

五when it is determined that a Designated In-Home Service Provider violates an obligation as prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (6);

六when an Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service is wrongly requested;

七when a Designated In-Home Service Provider is ordered to report, submit or present record books and documents pursuant to the provisions of Article 76, paragraph (1), but disobeys said order or submits a false report;

八when a Designated In-Home Service Provider or an employee of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider is requested to appear pursuant to the provisions of Article 76, paragraph (1), fails to respond or fails to reply to questions pursuant to the provisions of the same paragraph or submits a false reply, or refuses, interrupts, or interferes with an inspection pursuant to the provisions of the same paragraph, however, provided that this provision does not apply when an employee of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider performs said act but said Designated In-Home Service Provider is faithfully providing reasonable care and supervision in order to prevent said act of said employee;

九when a Designated In-Home Service Provider is appointed to provide service as set forth in the main clause of Article 41, paragraph (1) by wrongful means;

十in addition to the cases listed in the preceding items, when a Designated In-Home Service Provider violates this Act, another Act concerning citizens' health and medical care or public aid that are provided by a Cabinet Order, or an order or disposition of a matter based on these Acts;

十一in addition to the cases listed in the preceding items, when a Designated In-Home Service Provider performs a wrongful or significantly unjustifiable act concerning In-Home Service, etc.;

十二in a case when a Designated In-Home Service Provider is a juridical person, when any said Officer, etc., performs a wrongful or significantly unjustifiable act concerning In-Home Service, etc., within five years and the appointment as service provider is rescinded or the whole or a part of the effect of the appointment as service provider is suspended due to said act;

十三in a case when a Designated In-Home Service Provider is a Business Office that is not a juridical person, when the manager of said Provider is a person who performed a wrongful or significantly unjustifiable act concerning In-Home Service, etc., within five years before the time when the rescission of the designation or the suspension of the whole or a part of the effect of the designation is to be made.