If a registrar finds a request for review with regard to a disposition to be well-grounded, or finds the necessity to make a disposition related to a failure to act subject to a request for review, the registrar must make a reasonable disposition.
登記官は、処分についての審査請求を理由があると認め、又は審査請求に係る不作為に係る処分をすべきものと認めるときは、相当の処分をしなければならない。
Except in the cases prescribed in the preceding paragraph, a registrar must attach their opinions to the case and refer it to the Director of the Legal Affairs Bureau or District Legal Affairs Bureau referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article within three days from the date of the request. In this situation, the Director of the Legal Affairs Bureau or District Legal Affairs Bureau is to convey the registrar's opinions to the review officer prescribed in Article 11, paragraph (2) of the Administrative Complaint Review Act (Act No. 68 of 2014).
If the Director of the Legal Affairs Bureau or District Legal Affairs Bureau referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article finds a request for review with regard to a disposition to be well-grounded, or finds the necessity to make a disposition related to a failure to act subject to a request for review, the Director must order the registrar to make a reasonable disposition, and must give notice to the requester for the review and any other person who has an interest in the registration to that effect.
Before ordering a disposition referred to in the preceding paragraph, the Director of the Legal Affairs Bureau or District Legal Affairs Bureau referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article may order the registrar to make a provisional registration.
If the Director of the Legal Affairs Bureau or District Legal Affairs Bureau referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article finds the necessity to dismiss an application for a disposition related to a failure to act subject to a request for review, the Director must order the registrar to make a disposition to dismiss the application.
With regard to the application of the provisions of the Administrative Complaint Review Act in relation to a request for review referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, the phrase "administrative agency, etc. reaching the disposition" and the phrase "a written explanation has been submitted" in Article 29, paragraph (5) of the same Act is deemed to be replaced with "reviewing agency" and "opinions have been conveyed as prescribed in Article 157, paragraph (2) of the Real Property Registration Act (Act No. 123 of 2004)," respectively, and the term "written explanation" in Article 30, paragraph (1) of the Administrative Complaint Review Act is deemed to be replaced with "opinions referred to in Article 157, paragraph (2) of the Real Property Registration Act."
前条第一項の審査請求に関する行政不服審査法の規定の適用については、同法第二十九条第五項中「処分庁等」とあるのは「審査庁」と、「弁明書の提出」とあるのは「不動産登記法（平成十六年法律第百二十三号）第百五十七条第二項に規定する意見の送付」と、同法第三十条第一項中「弁明書」とあるのは「不動産登記法第百五十七条第二項の意見」とする。