Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt on a date not yet set

Read the text in force →

Civil Enforcement Act

民事執行法(みんじしっこうほう)

Section 1 General Provisions (Articles 36 to 42)

The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts upon the Enforcement of the Act Partially Amending the Civil Code, etc. (Act No. 46 of 2026) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

Article 36第三十六条

Judicial Decision Staying Enforcement in Connection with an Action Opposing the Granting of an Attestation of Enforceability(執行文付与に対する異議の訴え等に係る執行停止の裁判)
Article 36, paragraph (1)

If an action opposing the granting of an attestation of enforceability or an action to dispute a claim has been filed, and if the circumstances that the person alleges for raising the opposition or dispute appear to be legally well-grounded and a prima facie showing is made on factual matters, the court in charge of the case, upon petition, may order a stay of enforcement until a judicial decision as referred to in paragraph (1) of the following Article is made in the final judgment, while either requiring or not requiring security to be provided, or, in addition to the order, may issue an order for judicial enforcement to continue while requiring security to be provided, or may issue an order voiding an enforcement measure that has already been taken while requiring security to be provided. If there are pressing circumstances, the presiding judge may also order these measures.

執行文付与に対する異議の訴え又は請求異議の訴えの提起があつた場合において、異議のため主張した事情が法律上理由があるとみえ、かつ、事実上の点について疎明があつたときは、受訴裁判所は、申立てにより、終局判決において次条第一項の裁判をするまでの間、担保を立てさせ、若しくは立てさせないで強制執行の停止を命じ、又はこれとともに、担保を立てさせて強制執行の続行を命じ、若しくは担保を立てさせて既にした執行処分の取消しを命ずることができる。急迫の事情があるときは、裁判長も、これらの処分を命ずることができる。

Article 36, paragraph (2)

The court may render a judicial decision on the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph without hearing oral arguments.

前項の申立てについての裁判は、口頭弁論を経ないですることができる。

Article 36, paragraph (3)

If the grounds prescribed in paragraph (1) exist, if there are pressing circumstances, the enforcement court, upon petition, may order the measures prescribed in that paragraph, while specifying a period for submitting an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a judicial decision under that paragraph. This judicial decision may also be made before the filing of an action opposing the granting of an attestation of enforceability or an action to dispute a claim.

第一項に規定する事由がある場合において、急迫の事情があるときは、執行裁判所は、申立てにより、同項の規定による裁判の正本又は記録事項証明書を提出すべき期間を定めて、同項に規定する処分を命ずることができる。この裁判は、執行文付与に対する異議の訴え又は請求異議の訴えの提起前においても、することができる。

Article 36, paragraph (4)

When the period specified pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph has expired or when a judicial decision under paragraph (1) has been submitted to the enforcement court or court enforcement officer within the period, the judicial decision stated in the preceding paragraph ceases to be effective.

前項の規定により定められた期間を経過したとき、又はその期間内に第一項の規定による裁判が執行裁判所若しくは執行官に提出されたときは、前項の裁判は、その効力を失う。

Article 36, paragraph (5)

No appeal may be entered against a judicial decision on the petition referred to in paragraph (1) or paragraph (3).

第一項又は第三項の申立てについての裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

Article 37第三十七条

Judicial Decision to Stay Enforcement in the Final Judgment(終局判決における執行停止の裁判等)
Article 37, paragraph (1)

In the final judgment on an action opposing the granting of an attestation of enforceability or an action to dispute a claim, the court in charge of the case may order the measures prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article or void, change, or approve a judicial decision under that paragraph that has already been made. The court must make a declaration of provisional enforcement for this judicial decision.

受訴裁判所は、執行文付与に対する異議の訴え又は請求異議の訴えについての終局判決において、前条第一項に規定する処分を命じ、又は既にした同項の規定による裁判を取り消し、変更し、若しくは認可することができる。この裁判については、仮執行の宣言をしなければならない。

Article 37, paragraph (2)

No appeal may be entered against a judicial decision under the preceding paragraph.

前項の規定による裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

Article 38第三十八条

Third-Party Actions Opposing Enforcement(第三者異議の訴え)
Article 38, paragraph (1)

A third party who has ownership of the subject matter of judicial enforcement or any other right that obstructs assignment or delivery of the subject matter may file, against the obligee, a third-party action opposing enforcement to call for the court to disallow enforcement.

強制執行の目的物について所有権その他目的物の譲渡又は引渡しを妨げる権利を有する第三者は、債権者に対し、その強制執行の不許を求めるために、第三者異議の訴えを提起することができる。

Article 38, paragraph (2)

The third party prescribed in the preceding paragraph may file an action against the obligor regarding the subject matter of judicial enforcement, in consolidation with the action referred to in that paragraph.

前項に規定する第三者は、同項の訴えに併合して、債務者に対する強制執行の目的物についての訴えを提起することができる。

Article 38, paragraph (3)

The action referred to in paragraph (1) is under the jurisdiction of the enforcement court.

第一項の訴えは、執行裁判所が管轄する。

Article 38, paragraph (4)

The provisions of the preceding two Articles apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial decision to stay enforcement in connection with the action referred to in paragraph (1).

前二条の規定は、第一項の訴えに係る執行停止の裁判について準用する。

Article 39第三十九条

Stay of Judicial Enforcement(強制執行の停止)
Article 39, paragraph (1)

Judicial enforcement must be stayed if any of the following documents or electronic or magnetic records has been submitted:

強制執行は、次に掲げる文書又は電磁的記録の提出があつたときは、停止しなければならない。

Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i)

an enforceable authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a judicial decision containing a statement that a title of obligation (excluding a notarial instrument authorizing enforcement) or a declaration of provisional enforcement is revoked or a statement that judicial enforcement is not permitted;

債務名義(執行証書を除く。)若しくは仮執行の宣言を取り消す旨又は強制執行を許さない旨を記載した執行力のある裁判の正本又は記録事項証明書

Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii)

an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a final and binding judgment declaring a settlement, acknowledgment, mediation or labor tribunal decision that a title of obligation concerns to be invalid;

債務名義に係る和解、認諾、調停又は労働審判の効力がないことを宣言する確定判決の正本又は記録事項証明書

Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii)

an authenticated copy of a record or any other document prepared by a court clerk which proves that any of the titles of obligation stated in Article 22, item (ii) through (iv)-2 has ceased to be effective due to withdrawal of the action or any other grounds;

第二十二条第二号から第四号の二までに掲げる債務名義が訴えの取下げその他の事由により効力を失つたことを証する調書の正本その他の裁判所書記官の作成した文書

Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iv)

an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a record or electronic record of a judicial settlement or mediation in which it is indicated that the obligation will not be enforced or that the petition for enforcement is withdrawn;

強制執行をしない旨又はその申立てを取り下げる旨を記載した裁判上の和解又は調停の調書の正本又は電子調書の記録事項証明書

Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iv-2)

a written tribunal decision or an electronically written tribunal decision (meaning an electronic tribunal decision document prescribed in Article 20, paragraph (3) of the Labor Tribunal Act (Act No. 45 of 2004)) of a labor tribunal decision that has the same effect as a judicial settlement in which it is indicated that the obligation will not be enforced or that the petition for enforcement is withdrawn, or an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a record or electronic record containing a statement or record of the main text of the order and an outline of the reasons for a labor tribunal decision made by making an oral announcement in lieu of preparing these items;

強制執行をしない旨又はその申立てを取り下げる旨を記載した裁判上の和解と同一の効力を有する労働審判の審判書若しくは電子審判書(労働審判法(平成十六年法律第四十五号)第二十条第三項に規定する電子審判書をいう。)又はこれらの作成に代えて口頭で告知する方法により行われた労働審判の主文及び理由の要旨を記載し、若しくは記録した調書若しくは電子調書の正本又は記録事項証明書

Article 39, paragraph (1), item (v)

a document or electronic or magnetic record proving that security for avoiding judicial enforcement has been provided;

強制執行を免れるための担保を立てたことを証する文書又は電磁的記録

Article 39, paragraph (1), item (vi)

an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a judicial decision in which the court has indicated that it is issuing an order staying enforcement and voiding an enforcement measure;

強制執行の停止及び執行処分の取消しを命ずる旨を記載した裁判の正本又は記録事項証明書

Article 39, paragraph (1), item (vii)

an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a judicial decision in which the court has indicated that it is issuing an order for a temporarily staying enforcement; or

強制執行の一時の停止を命ずる旨を記載した裁判の正本又は記録事項証明書

Article 39, paragraph (1), item (viii)

a document or electronic or magnetic record indicating or recording that, after the establishment of a title of obligation, the obligee has had their claim satisfied or consented to granting a grace period for performance.

債権者が、債務名義の成立後に、弁済を受け、又は弁済の猶予を承諾した旨を記載し、又は記録した文書又は電磁的記録

Article 39, paragraph (2)

A stay of judicial enforcement based on submission of a document or electronic or magnetic record stated in item (viii) of the preceding paragraph which contains or records a statement that an obligee received performance is limited to a period of four weeks.

前項第八号に掲げる文書又は電磁的記録のうち弁済を受けた旨を記載し、又は記録した文書又は電磁的記録の提出による強制執行の停止は、四週間に限るものとする。

Article 39, paragraph (3)

A stay of judicial enforcement based on submission of a document or electronic or magnetic record stated in paragraph (1), item (viii) which contains or records a statement that an obligee consented to granting a grace period of performance that may only be effected twice and the total period does not exceed six months.

第一項第八号に掲げる文書又は電磁的記録のうち弁済の猶予を承諾した旨を記載し、又は記録した文書又は電磁的記録の提出による強制執行の停止は、二回に限り、かつ、通じて六月を超えることができない。

Article 39, paragraph (4)

If a document (excluding a certificate of recorded information) stated in paragraph (1), item (iii) should be submitted pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph, a person seeking to submit a petition to stay enforcement may, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court, submit the information prescribed in the Rules of the Supreme Court as the information necessary to identify the case concerning which the grounds prescribed in the item have arisen in lieu of submitting the document. In this case, that person is deemed to have submitted the relevant document.

第一項の規定により同項第三号に掲げる文書(記録事項証明書を除く。)を提出すべき場合には、強制執行の停止の申立てをしようとする者は、当該文書の提出に代えて、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、同号の事由が生じた事件を特定するために必要な情報として最高裁判所規則で定めるものを提供することができる。この場合において、当該者は、当該文書を提出したものとみなす。

Article 40第四十条

Voiding an Enforcement Disposition(執行処分の取消し)
Article 40, paragraph (1)

If a document or electronic or magnetic record stated in paragraph (1), item (i) through (vi) of the preceding Article has been submitted, the enforcement court or court enforcement officer must void even an enforcement disposition that has already been taken.

前条第一項第一号から第六号までに掲げる文書又は電磁的記録が提出されたときは、執行裁判所又は執行官は、既にした執行処分をも取り消さなければならない。

Article 40, paragraph (2)

The provisions of Article 12 do not apply if the enforcement court or court enforcement officer voids an enforcement disposition pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

第十二条の規定は、前項の規定により執行処分を取り消す場合については適用しない。

Article 41第四十一条

Continuation of Judicial Enforcement If the Obligor Has Died(債務者が死亡した場合の強制執行の続行)
1 change in this article
Article 41, paragraph (1)(債務者が死亡した場合の強制執行の続行)

Judicial enforcement may be continued even if the obligor died after its commencement.

強制執行は、その開始後に債務者が死亡した場合においても、続行することができる。

Article 41, paragraph (2)(債務者が死亡した場合の強制執行の続行)

In the cases of the preceding paragraph, if existence of an heir to the obligor or the whereabouts of this person is unknown, the enforcement court may, upon petition, appoint a special representative for the inherited property or heir.

前項の場合において、債務者の相続人の存在又はその所在が明らかでないときは、執行裁判所は、申立てにより、相続財産又は相続人のために、特別代理人を選任することができる。

Article 41, paragraph (3)(債務者が死亡した場合の強制執行の続行)(Continuation of Judicial Enforcement If the Obligor Has Died)Changed

The provisions of Article 35, paragraphs (23) and (34) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the special representative referred to in the preceding paragraph.

民事訴訟法第三十五条第二三項及び第三四項の規定は、前項の特別代理人について準用する。

Article 42第四十二条

Sharing of Enforcement Costs(執行費用の負担)
Article 42, paragraph (1)

The cost of judicial enforcement that is necessary (referred to as "enforcement cost" below) is borne by the obligor.

強制執行の費用で必要なもの(以下「執行費用」という。)は、債務者の負担とする。

Article 42, paragraph (2)

In judicial enforcement of claim for payment of money, the enforcement cost may be collected simultaneously in the course of the enforcement procedures without requiring a title of obligation.

金銭の支払を目的とする債権についての強制執行にあつては、執行費用は、その執行手続において、債務名義を要しないで、同時に、取り立てることができる。

Article 42, paragraph (3)

When a judicial decision revoking a title of obligation (excluding a notarial instrument authorizing enforcement) on which enforcement is based, or a judgment declaring invalidity of a settlement, acknowledgment, mediation or labor tribunal decision that a title of obligation concerns has become final and binding, the obligee must return, to the obligor, money equivalent to the enforcement cost that has been paid to the obligee.

強制執行の基本となる債務名義(執行証書を除く。)を取り消す旨の裁判又は債務名義に係る和解、認諾、調停若しくは労働審判の効力がないことを宣言する判決が確定したときは、債権者は、支払を受けた執行費用に相当する金銭を債務者に返還しなければならない。

Article 42, paragraph (4)

The portion of the enforcement cost to be borne by an obligor pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) (excluding costs that were collected pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2); the same applies in the following paragraph and paragraph (7)) and the amount of money to be returned by an obligee pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph are established by a clerk of the enforcement court, upon petition.

第一項の規定により債務者が負担すべき執行費用(第二項の規定により取り立てられたものを除く。次項及び第七項において同じ。)及び前項の規定により債権者が返還すべき金銭の額は、申立てにより、執行裁判所の裁判所書記官が定める。

Article 42, paragraph (5)

A petition prescribed in the preceding paragraph must be filed within 10 years from the day stated in the following items in accordance with the categories of the amounts stated in the respective items:

前項の申立ては、次の各号に掲げる額の区分に応じ、それぞれ当該各号に定める日から十年以内にしなければならない。

Article 42, paragraph (5), item (i)

the amount of the enforcement cost prescribed in the preceding paragraph:the day on which the judicial enforcement proceedings are completed; or

前項に規定する執行費用の額 強制執行の手続の終了の日

Article 42, paragraph (5), item (ii)

the amount of money to be returned prescribed in the preceding paragraph:the day on which the judicial decision or judgment prescribed in paragraph (3) becomes final and binding.

前項に規定する返還すべき金銭の額 第三項に規定する裁判又は判決が確定した日

Article 42, paragraph (6)

A person may file an objection with the enforcement court to the court clerk's disposition concerning a petition referred to in paragraph (4), within an inalterable period of one week from the day on which the person is notified of those measures.

第四項の申立てについての裁判所書記官の処分に対しては、その告知を受けた日から一週間の不変期間内に、執行裁判所に異議を申し立てることができる。

Article 42, paragraph (7)

If the enforcement court finds there to be grounds to the filing of an objection to a court clerk's disposition under paragraph (4), and the enforcement cost and the amount of money to be returned prescribed in that paragraph are required to be established, the court must establish those amounts itself.

執行裁判所は、第四項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立てを理由があると認める場合において、同項に規定する執行費用及び返還すべき金銭の額を定めるべきときは、自らその額を定めなければならない。

Article 42, paragraph (8)

An appeal may be filed against a ruling on the objection under paragraph (6).

第六項の規定による異議の申立てについての決定に対しては、執行抗告をすることができる。

Article 42, paragraph (9)

A court clerk's disposition under paragraph (4) does not become effective until it becomes final and binding.

第四項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。

Article 42, paragraph (10)

The provisions of Article 74, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to a court clerk's disposition under paragraph (4). In this case, the provisions of paragraph (6), paragraph (8), the preceding paragraph and Article 74, paragraph (3) apply mutatis mutandis.

民事訴訟法第七十四条第一項の規定は、第四項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分について準用する。この場合においては、第六項、第八項及び前項並びに同条第三項の規定を準用する。

Change 1 of 1
© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy