Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

5 articles

Chapter IV Judicial Proceedings for the Exclusion, etc. of Unknown or Missing Unit Owners, etc.

第四章 所在等不明区分所有者等の除外等に関する裁判手続

Article 86Judicial Decisions on the Exclusion of Unknown or Missing Unit Owners, etc.

第八十六条(所在等不明区分所有者等の除外に関する裁判)

Cases concerning the judicial decisions set forth in the following items are subject to the jurisdiction of the district court with jurisdiction in the locality of the thing specified in the relevant item:

次の各号に掲げる裁判に係る事件は、それぞれ当該各号に定める物の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄に属する。

a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 38-2, paragraph (1): the building to which the judicial decision relates;

第三十八条の二第一項の規定による裁判 当該裁判に係る建物

a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 38-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66 and Article 79: the land or attached facilities to which the judicial decision relates; and

第六十六条及び第七十九条において準用する第三十八条の二第一項の規定による裁判 当該裁判に係る土地又は附属施設

a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 38-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73: the grounds of the building or attached facilities to which the judicial decision relates.

第七十三条において準用する第三十八条の二第一項の規定による裁判 当該裁判に係る建物の敷地又は附属施設

The court may not make the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph unless it has given public notice of the following matters and the period referred to in item (ii) has elapsed. In such a case, the period referred to in that item may not be less than one month.

前項の裁判は、裁判所が次に掲げる事項を公告し、かつ、第二号の期間を経過した後でなければ、することができない。この場合において、同号の期間は、一月を下つてはならない。

that a petition for the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph has been filed with regard to the thing specified in the relevant item of that paragraph;

前項各号に定める物について同項の裁判の申立てがあつたこと。

that if there is any objection to the court making the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph, the following persons should file a notification to that effect within a certain period of time:

裁判所が前項の裁判をすることについて異議があるときは、次に掲げる者は一定の期間内にその旨の届出をすべきこと。

an unknown or missing unit owner prescribed in Article 38-2, paragraph (1);

第三十八条の二第一項に規定する所在等不明区分所有者

an unknown or missing owner of buildings in a housing complex or an unknown or missing owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc. prescribed in Article 38-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66 or Article 79 following the deemed replacement of terms; and

第六十六条又は第七十九条において読み替えて準用する第三十八条の二第一項に規定する所在等不明団地建物所有者又は所在等不明団地建物所有者等

an unknown or missing co-owner of the grounds, etc. prescribed in Article 38-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73 following the deemed replacement of terms;

第七十三条において読み替えて準用する第三十八条の二第一項に規定する所在等不明敷地共有者等

that if there is no notification referred to in the preceding item, the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph will be made.

前号の届出がないときは、前項の裁判がされること。

The judicial decision referred to in paragraph (1) does not become effective unless it becomes final and binding.

第一項の裁判は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。

The judicial decision referred to in paragraph (1) need not be notified to the persons set forth in paragraph (2), item (ii), (a) through (c).

第一項の裁判は、第二項第二号イからハまでに掲げる者に告知することを要しない。

If the owner of the thing specified in the relevant item of paragraph (1) (including a person who holds a share of co-ownership in it) and their whereabouts have become known, the court must revoke the judicial decision referred to in that paragraph upon petition by an interested person.

裁判所は、第一項各号に定める物の所有者(その共有持分を有する者を含む。)及びその所在が判明したときは、利害関係人の申立てにより、同項の裁判を取り消さなければならない。

Only an interested person may file an immediate appeal against the judicial decision referred to in paragraph (1) and against a judicial decision on revocation under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

第一項の裁判及び前項の規定による取消しの裁判に対しては、利害関係人に限り、即時抗告をすることができる。

Article 87Order for Management of an Exclusively-Owned Area with an Unknown Owner

第八十七条(所有者不明専有部分管理命令)

Non-contentious cases under the provisions of Chapter I, Section 6 are subject to the jurisdiction of the district court with jurisdiction in the locality of the exclusively-owned area to which the matter for which a judicial decision is sought relates.

第一章第六節の規定による非訟事件は、裁判を求める事項に係る専有部分の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄に属する。

The court may not issue an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner unless it has given public notice of the following matters and the period referred to in item (ii) has elapsed. In such a case, the period referred to in that item may not be less than one month.

裁判所は、次に掲げる事項を公告し、かつ、第二号の期間を経過した後でなければ、所有者不明専有部分管理命令をすることができない。この場合において、同号の期間は、一月を下つてはならない。

that a petition for an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner has been filed with regard to the exclusively-owned area or share of co-ownership that is to be subject to it;

所有者不明専有部分管理命令の申立てがその対象となるべき専有部分又は共有持分についてあつたこと。

that if there is any objection to the issuance of an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner, the person who holds the exclusively-owned area or share of co-ownership that is to be subject to the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner should file a notification to that effect within a certain period of time; and

所有者不明専有部分管理命令をすることについて異議があるときは、所有者不明専有部分管理命令の対象となるべき専有部分又は共有持分を有する者は一定の期間内にその旨の届出をすべきこと。

that if there is no notification referred to in the preceding item, an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner will be issued.

前号の届出がないときは、所有者不明専有部分管理命令がされること。

In filing a petition for permission referred to in Article 46-3, paragraph (2) or Article 46-6, paragraph (2), the petitioner must make a prima facie showing of the reasons for seeking the permission.

第四十六条の三第二項又は第四十六条の六第二項の許可の申立てをする場合には、その許可を求める理由を疎明しなければならない。

When making a judicial decision on dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-6, paragraph (1) or a judicial decision fixing the amount of expenses or remuneration under the provisions of Article 46-7, paragraph (1), the court must hear the statement of the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner.

裁判所は、第四十六条の六第一項の規定による解任の裁判又は第四十六条の七第一項の規定による費用若しくは報酬の額を定める裁判をする場合には、所有者不明専有部分管理人の陳述を聴かなければならない。

Reasons must be given for the following judicial decisions:

次に掲げる裁判には、理由を付さなければならない。

a judicial decision dismissing a petition for an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner;

所有者不明専有部分管理命令の申立てを却下する裁判

a judicial decision dismissing a petition for permission referred to in Article 46-3, paragraph (2) or Article 46-6, paragraph (2); and

第四十六条の三第二項又は第四十六条の六第二項の許可の申立てを却下する裁判

a judicial decision on a petition for dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-6, paragraph (1).

第四十六条の六第一項の規定による解任の申立てについての裁判

If an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner has been issued, a court clerk must, on their own authority and without delay, commission the registration of the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner with regard to the exclusively-owned area or share of co-ownership that has been made subject to the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner.

所有者不明専有部分管理命令があつた場合には、裁判所書記官は、職権で、遅滞なく、所有者不明専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分又は共有持分について、所有者不明専有部分管理命令の登記を嘱託しなければならない。

If a judicial decision revoking an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner has been made, a court clerk must, on their own authority and without delay, commission the cancellation of the registration of the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner.

所有者不明専有部分管理命令を取り消す裁判があつたときは、裁判所書記官は、職権で、遅滞なく、所有者不明専有部分管理命令の登記の抹消を嘱託しなければならない。

If money has arisen from the management or disposition of, or any other cause related to, the exclusively-owned area or share of co-ownership that has been made subject to an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner, as well as the movables, the rights related to the common areas and attached facilities, and the right to use the grounds to which the effect of the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner extends, the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner may deposit that money with a deposit office in the locality of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner (or, if the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner was issued with respect to a share of co-ownership, the exclusively-owned area that is the property in co-ownership), for the unit owner of that exclusively-owned area or the person who holds that share of co-ownership. In such a case, having made the deposit, the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner must give public notice to that effect and of other matters specified by Ministry of Justice Order, pursuant to the provisions of Ministry of Justice Order.

所有者不明専有部分管理人は、所有者不明専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分又は共有持分並びに所有者不明専有部分管理命令の効力が及ぶ動産並びに共用部分及び附属施設に関する権利並びに敷地利用権の管理、処分その他の事由により金銭が生じたときは、その専有部分の区分所有者又はその共有持分を有する者のために、当該金銭を所有者不明専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分(共有持分を対象として所有者不明専有部分管理命令が発せられた場合にあつては、共有物である専有部分)の所在地の供託所に供託することができる。この場合において、供託をしたときは、法務省令で定めるところにより、その旨その他法務省令で定める事項を公告しなければならない。

裁判所は、所有者不明専有部分管理命令を変更し、又は取り消すことができる。

If there ceases to be any property to be managed (including if all of the property to be managed has been deposited) or if it otherwise ceases to be appropriate to continue the management of the property, the court must revoke the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner upon petition by the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner or petition by an interested person, or by its own authority.

裁判所は、管理すべき財産がなくなつたとき(管理すべき財産の全部が供託されたときを含む。)その他財産の管理を継続することが相当でなくなつたときは、所有者不明専有部分管理人若しくは利害関係人の申立てにより又は職権で、所有者不明専有部分管理命令を取り消さなければならない。

If the owner of the exclusively-owned area, etc. with an unknown owner (including a person who holds a share of co-ownership in it; hereinafter the same applies in this Article) has proved that the ownership of the exclusively-owned area, etc. with an unknown owner (including a share of co-ownership in it) belongs to them, the court must revoke the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner upon petition by that owner. In such a case, if the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner has been revoked, the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner must report to that owner on the progress and results of the administrator's affairs and must deliver to that owner the property that has been proved to belong to that owner.

所有者不明専有部分等の所有者(その共有持分を有する者を含む。以下この条において同じ。)が所有者不明専有部分等の所有権(その共有持分を含む。)が自己に帰属することを証明したときは、裁判所は、当該所有者の申立てにより、所有者不明専有部分管理命令を取り消さなければならない。この場合において、所有者不明専有部分管理命令が取り消されたときは、所有者不明専有部分管理人は、当該所有者に対し、その事務の経過及び結果を報告し、当該所有者に帰属することが証明された財産を引き渡さなければならない。

An order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner and a judicial decision changing it need not be notified to the owner of the exclusively-owned area, etc. with an unknown owner.

所有者不明専有部分管理命令及びその変更の裁判は、所有者不明専有部分等の所有者に告知することを要しない。

It is sufficient to notify the owner of the exclusively-owned area, etc. with an unknown owner of a judicial decision revoking an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner only if that owner and their whereabouts are known from the records of the case.

所有者不明専有部分管理命令の取消しの裁判は、事件の記録上所有者不明専有部分等の所有者及びその所在が判明している場合に限り、その所有者に告知すれば足りる。

Only the persons specified in the following items may file an immediate appeal against the judicial decisions set forth in the respective items:

次の各号に掲げる裁判に対しては、それぞれ当該各号に定める者に限り、即時抗告をすることができる。

a judicial decision on dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-6, paragraph (1): an interested person;

第四十六条の六第一項の規定による解任の裁判 利害関係人

a judicial decision fixing the amount of expenses or remuneration under the provisions of Article 46-7, paragraph (1): the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner; and

第四十六条の七第一項の規定による費用又は報酬の額を定める裁判 所有者不明専有部分管理人

a judicial decision on change or revocation under the provisions of paragraphs (9) through (11): an interested person.

第九項から第十一項までの規定による変更又は取消しの裁判 利害関係人

No appeal may be entered against the following judicial decisions:

次に掲げる裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

a judicial decision on the appointment of an administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner under the provisions of Article 46-2, paragraph (4); and

第四十六条の二第四項の規定による所有者不明専有部分管理人の選任の裁判

a judicial decision granting permission referred to in Article 46-3, paragraph (2) or Article 46-6, paragraph (2).

Article 88Order for Management of a Poorly Managed Exclusively-Owned Area and Order for Management of a Poorly Managed Common Area

第八十八条(管理不全専有部分管理命令及び管理不全共用部分管理命令)

Non-contentious cases under the provisions of Chapter I, Section 7 are subject to the jurisdiction of the district court with jurisdiction in the locality of the exclusively-owned area or common area to which the matter for which a judicial decision is sought relates.

第一章第七節の規定による非訟事件は、裁判を求める事項に係る専有部分又は共用部分の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄に属する。

In filing a petition for permission referred to in Article 46-9, paragraph (3) or Article 46-11, paragraph (2), the petitioner must make a prima facie showing of the reasons for seeking the permission.

第四十六条の九第三項又は第四十六条の十一第二項の許可の申立てをする場合には、その許可を求める理由を疎明しなければならない。

When making the judicial decisions set forth in the following items, the court must hear the statements of the persons specified in the respective items; provided, however, that this does not apply if, in making the judicial decision set forth in item (i), there are circumstances in which going through the procedure for hearing the statement would prevent the purpose of the petition for that judicial decision from being achieved:

裁判所は、次の各号に掲げる裁判をする場合には、それぞれ当該各号に定める者の陳述を聴かなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる裁判をする場合において、その陳述を聴く手続を経ることにより当該裁判の申立ての目的を達することができない事情があるときは、この限りでない。

an order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area: the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area that is to be subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

管理不全専有部分管理命令 管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象となるべき専有部分の区分所有者

a judicial decision granting permission referred to in Article 46-9, paragraph (3): the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

a judicial decision on dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-11, paragraph (1): the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

第四十六条の十一第一項の規定による解任の裁判 管理不全専有部分管理人

a judicial decision fixing the amount of expenses under the provisions of Article 46-12, paragraph (1): the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area; and

第四十六条の十二第一項の規定による費用の額を定める裁判 管理不全専有部分管理人

a judicial decision fixing the amount of remuneration under the provisions of Article 46-12, paragraph (1): the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area and the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area.

第四十六条の十二第一項の規定による報酬の額を定める裁判 管理不全専有部分管理人及び管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分の区分所有者

Reasons must be given for the following judicial decisions:

次に掲げる裁判には、理由を付さなければならない。

a judicial decision on a petition for an order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

管理不全専有部分管理命令の申立てについての裁判

a judicial decision on a petition for permission referred to in Article 46-9, paragraph (3);

第四十六条の九第三項の許可の申立てについての裁判

a judicial decision on a petition for dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-11, paragraph (1); and

第四十六条の十一第一項の規定による解任の申立てについての裁判

a judicial decision dismissing a petition for permission referred to in Article 46-11, paragraph (2).

第四十六条の十一第二項の許可の申立てを却下する裁判

If money has arisen from the management or disposition of, or any other cause related to, the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to an order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area, as well as the movables, the rights related to the common areas and attached facilities, and the right to use the grounds to which the effect of the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area extends, the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area may deposit that money with a deposit office in the locality of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area, for the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area (including a person who holds a share of co-ownership in it). In such a case, having made the deposit, the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area must give public notice to that effect and of other matters specified by Ministry of Justice Order, pursuant to the provisions of Ministry of Justice Order.

管理不全専有部分管理人は、管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分並びに管理不全専有部分管理命令の効力が及ぶ動産並びに共用部分及び附属施設に関する権利並びに敷地利用権の管理、処分その他の事由により金銭が生じたときは、その専有部分の区分所有者(その共有持分を有する者を含む。)のために、当該金銭を管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分の所在地の供託所に供託することができる。この場合において、供託をしたときは、法務省令で定めるところにより、その旨その他法務省令で定める事項を公告しなければならない。

裁判所は、管理不全専有部分管理命令を変更し、又は取り消すことができる。

If there ceases to be any property to be managed (including if all of the property to be managed has been deposited) or if it otherwise ceases to be appropriate to continue the management of the property, the court must revoke the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area upon petition by the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area or petition by an interested person, or by its own authority.

裁判所は、管理すべき財産がなくなつたとき(管理すべき財産の全部が供託されたときを含む。)その他財産の管理を継続することが相当でなくなつたときは、管理不全専有部分管理人若しくは利害関係人の申立てにより又は職権で、管理不全専有部分管理命令を取り消さなければならない。

Only the persons specified in the following items may file an immediate appeal against the judicial decisions set forth in the respective items:

次の各号に掲げる裁判に対しては、それぞれ当該各号に定める者に限り、即時抗告をすることができる。

a judicial decision granting permission referred to in Article 46-9, paragraph (3): the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

a judicial decision on dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-11, paragraph (1): an interested person;

第四十六条の十一第一項の規定による解任の裁判 利害関係人

a judicial decision fixing the amount of expenses under the provisions of Article 46-12, paragraph (1): the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

第四十六条の十二第一項の規定による費用の額を定める裁判 管理不全専有部分管理人

a judicial decision fixing the amount of remuneration under the provisions of Article 46-12, paragraph (1): the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area and the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area; and

第四十六条の十二第一項の規定による報酬の額を定める裁判 管理不全専有部分管理人及び管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分の区分所有者

a judicial decision on change or revocation under the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs: an interested person.

前二項の規定による変更又は取消しの裁判 利害関係人

No appeal may be entered against the following judicial decisions:

次に掲げる裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

a judicial decision on the appointment of an administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area under the provisions of Article 46-8, paragraph (3); and

第四十六条の八第三項の規定による管理不全専有部分管理人の選任の裁判

a judicial decision granting permission referred to in Article 46-11, paragraph (2).

The provisions of paragraph (2) through the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to an order for management of a poorly managed common area and an administrator of a poorly managed common area. In such a case, the phrase "Article 46-9, paragraph (3)" in paragraph (2), paragraph (3), item (ii), paragraph (4), item (ii), and paragraph (8), item (ii) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 46-9, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 46-14"; in paragraph (3), items (i), (ii), and (v), paragraph (5), and paragraph (8), items (ii) and (v), the phrase "of the exclusively-owned area" is deemed to be replaced with "of the common area", and the term "unit owner" with "owner"; the phrase "Article 46-11, paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3), item (iii), paragraph (4), item (iii), and paragraph (8), item (iii) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 46-11, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 46-14"; the phrase "Article 46-12, paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3), items (iv) and (v) and paragraph (8), items (iv) and (v) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 46-12, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 46-14"; the phrase "Article 46-11, paragraph (2)" in paragraph (4), item (iv) and item (ii) of the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 46-11, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 46-14"; in paragraph (5), the phrase "the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to an order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area, as well as" is deemed to be replaced with "the common area that has been made subject to an order for management of a poorly managed common area and", and the phrase "the movables, the rights related to the common areas and attached facilities, and the right to use the grounds" with "the movables"; and the phrase "Article 46-8, paragraph (3)" in item (i) of the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 46-13, paragraph (3)".

第二項から前項までの規定は、管理不全共用部分管理命令及び管理不全共用部分管理人について準用する。この場合において、第二項、第三項第二号、第四項第二号及び第八項第二号中「第四十六条の九第三項」とあるのは「第四十六条の十四において準用する第四十六条の九第三項」と、第三項第一号、第二号及び第五号、第五項並びに第八項第二号及び第五号中「専有部分の」とあるのは「共用部分の」と、「区分所有者」とあるのは「所有者」と、第三項第三号、第四項第三号及び第八項第三号中「第四十六条の十一第一項」とあるのは「第四十六条の十四において準用する第四十六条の十一第一項」と、第三項第四号及び第五号並びに第八項第四号及び第五号中「第四十六条の十二第一項」とあるのは「第四十六条の十四において準用する第四十六条の十二第一項」と、第四項第四号及び前項第二号中「第四十六条の十一第二項」とあるのは「第四十六条の十四において準用する第四十六条の十一第二項」と、第五項中「専有部分並びに」とあるのは「共用部分及び」と、「動産並びに共用部分及び附属施設に関する権利並びに敷地利用権」とあるのは「動産」と、前項第一号中「第四十六条の八第三項」とあるのは「第四十六条の十三第三項」と読み替えるものとする。

Article 89Exclusion from Application of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act

第八十九条(非訟事件手続法の適用除外)

The provisions of do not apply to cases concerning a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 38-2, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66, Article 73, and Article 79).

第三十八条の二第一項(第六十六条、第七十三条及び第七十九条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による裁判に係る事件については、の規定は、適用しない。

The provisions of and do not apply to non-contentious cases under the provisions of Chapter I, Sections 6 and 7.

第一章第六節及び第七節の規定による非訟事件については、及びの規定は、適用しない。

Article 90Supreme Court Rules

第九十条(最高裁判所規則)

Beyond what is provided for in this Chapter, the necessary matters concerning judicial proceedings for cases concerning a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 38-2, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66, Article 73, and Article 79) and for non-contentious cases under the provisions of Chapter I, Sections 6 and 7 are specified by Supreme Court Rules.

この章に定めるもののほか、第三十八条の二第一項(第六十六条、第七十三条及び第七十九条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による裁判に係る事件並びに第一章第六節及び第七節の規定による非訟事件に関する裁判手続に関し必要な事項は、最高裁判所規則で定める。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.SourcesTermsPrivacy