Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt by 13 June 2028, on a day set by — at the latest in 2 years

Read the text in force →

Act on Measures against Infringement of Rights, etc. Arising from the Distribution of Information through Specified Telecommunications

特定電気通信による情報の流通によって発生する権利侵害等への対処に関する法律(とくていでんきつうしんによるじょうほうのりゅうつうによってはっせいするけんりしんがいとうへのたいしょにかんするほうりつ)

Chapter V Obligations of Large-scale Specified Telecommunications Service Providers (Articles 27 to 35)

The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts to Promote the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Civil Procedures, etc. (Act No. 53 of 2023) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

Article 27第二十七条Caption changed

Measures such as Notification to SendersPublication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention Measures発信者に対する通知等の措置送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表
11 changes in this article
Article 27, paragraph (1)(送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表)Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresChanged

When a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider has taken transmission prevention measures withWith regard to the dissemination of information through specified telecommunications conducted using the large-scale specified telecommunications service it provides, it must, except in a case falling under either of the following items, without delay,a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider may take measures to notify the sender of the information whose transmission was prevented by those transmission prevention measures of that fact and the reasons therefor, or to place that factonly where it complies with the standards that it has itself established and those reasons in a statepublished, other than in which the sender of that information can readily learna case falling under any of them (referred to as "notification or similar measures" in item (ii) and in Article 28, item (iii))the following items. In this case, if those transmission prevention measures were taken in accordance with the standards under paragraph (1) standards must have been published no later than a fixed period specified by Order of the preceding Article, it must make clear, in those reasons,Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications before the relationship between those day on which the transmission prevention measures and those standardsare taken.

大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、その提供する大規模特定電気通信役務を利用して行われる特定電気通信による情報の流通について送信防止措置を講じたときは、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合を除き、遅滞なく、その旨及びその理由を当該送信防止措置により送信を防止された情報の発信者に通知し、又は当該情報の発信者が容易に知り得る状態に置く措置(第二号及び第二十八条第三号において「通知等の措置」という。)を講じなければならないのほか、自ら定め、公表している基準に従う場合に限り、送信防止措置を講ずることができる。この場合において、当該送信防止措置が前条第一項の基準に従って講じられたものであるとき基準は、当該理由において、当該送信防止措置と当該基準との関係を明らかにしを講ずる日の総務省令で定める一定の期間前までに公表されていなければならない。

Article 27, paragraph (1), item (i)(送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表)Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresChanged

if the large-scale specified telecommunications service provider is the sender of the information for which it tookis about to take transmission prevention measures;

当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が送信防止措置を講じたようとする情報の発信者であるとき。

Article 27, paragraph (1), item (ii)(送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表)Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresChanged

if it has previously taken notification or similar measures with regard there is a legal obligation (excluding an obligation to make efforts) to having prevented the transmission of similar information take transmission prevention measures, such as an obligation to the same sender for a similar reason, or if there is otherwise a justifiable reason for not taking notification or similar measuresprevent the transmission of information that unjustly violates the rights of others, and transmission prevention measures are taken based on that obligation;

過去に同一の発信者に対して同様の他人の権利を不当に侵害する情報の送信を同様の理由により防止したことについて通知等の措置を講じていたとき防止する義務がある場合その他の通知等の送信防止措置を講じないことについて正当な理由があずる法令上の義務(努力義務を除く。)がある場合において、当該義務に基づき送信防止措置を講ずるとき。

Article 27, paragraph (1), item (iii)(送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表)Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresAdded

if transmission prevention measures are taken due to an urgent necessity, and the type of information for which the transmission prevention measures are taken is not explicitly stated as subject to transmission prevention measures in those standards because it is not ordinarily foreseeable.

緊急の必要により送信防止措置を講ずる場合であって、当該送信防止措置を講ずる情報の種類が、通常予測することができないものであるため、当該基準における送信防止措置の対象として明示されていないとき。

Article 27, paragraph (2)(送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表)Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresAdded

In establishing the standards under the preceding paragraph, a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must endeavor to ensure that the content of the standards conforms to all of the following items:

大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、前項の基準を定めるに当たっては、当該基準の内容が次の各号のいずれにも適合したものとなるよう努めなければならない。

Article 27, paragraph (2), item (i)(送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表)Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresAdded

the types of information subject to transmission prevention measures are specified as concretely as possible according to the cause by which the relevant large-scale specified telecommunications service provider came to know of the dissemination of that information;

送信防止措置の対象となる情報の種類が、当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が当該情報の流通を知ることとなった原因の別に応じて、できる限り具体的に定められていること。

Article 27, paragraph (2), item (ii)(送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表)Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresAdded

if service suspension measures may be taken, the standards for the implementation of service suspension measures are specified as concretely as possible;

役務提供停止措置を講ずることがある場合においては、役務提供停止措置の実施に関する基準ができる限り具体的に定められていること。

Article 27, paragraph (2), item (iii)(送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表)Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresAdded

the standards are written in expressions that senders and other persons concerned can easily understand;

発信者その他の関係者が容易に理解することのできる表現を用いて記載されていること。

Article 27, paragraph (2), item (iv)(送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表)Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresAdded

consideration is given to consistency with laws and regulations that provide for an obligation to make efforts regarding the implementation of transmission prevention measures.

送信防止措置の実施に関する努力義務を定める法令との整合性に配慮されていること。

Article 27, paragraph (3)(送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表)Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresAdded

When a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider has taken transmission prevention measures on the ground that it falls under item (iii) of paragraph (1), it must promptly change the standards under that paragraph so that it is clear that the type of information for which it took those transmission prevention measures is subject to transmission prevention measures.

大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、第一項第三号に該当することを理由に送信防止措置を講じたときは、速やかに、当該送信防止措置を講じた情報の種類が送信防止措置の対象となることが明らかになるよう同項の基準を変更しなければならない。

Article 27, paragraph (4)(送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表)Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresAdded

A large-scale specified telecommunications service provider that has published the standards under paragraph (1) is to endeavor to prepare and publish, approximately once a year, materials organizing, by type of information, those cases of information for which it has taken transmission prevention measures in accordance with those standards that should serve as a reference for senders and other persons concerned.

第一項の基準を公表している大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、おおむね一年に一回、当該基準に従って送信防止措置を講じた情報の事例のうち発信者その他の関係者に参考となるべきものを情報の種類ごとに整理した資料を作成し、公表するよう努めなければならない。

Article 28第二十八条Caption changed

Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Measures such as Notification to Senders措置の実施状況等の公表発信者に対する通知等の措置
8 changes in this article
Article 28, paragraph (1)(発信者に対する通知等の措置)Measures such as Notification to SendersChanged

A When a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider has taken transmission prevention measures with regard to the dissemination of information through specified telecommunications conducted using the large-scale specified telecommunications service it provides, it must, once every year, as specified without delay, except in the case where it falls under any of the following items, take measures to notify the sender of the information whose transmission was prevented by Order those transmission prevention measures of that fact and the Ministry reason therefor, or to put it in a state where the sender of Internal Affairs that information can easily know (referred to as "notification or similar measures" in item (ii) and Communications, publish Article 29, item (iii)); in this case, if those transmission prevention measures were taken in accordance with the following mattersstandards under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, it must make clear, in that reason, the relationship between those transmission prevention measures and those standards:

大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、毎年一回、総務省令で定めるところにより、次に掲げる事項を公表その提供する大規模特定電気通信役務を利用して行われる特定電気通信による情報の流通について送信防止措置を講じたときは、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合を除き、遅滞なく、その旨及びその理由を当該送信防止措置により送信を防止された情報の発信者に通知し、又は当該情報の発信者が容易に知り得る状態に置く措置(第二号及び第二十九条第三号において「通知等の措置」という。)を講じなければならない。この場合において、当該送信防止措置が前条第一項の基準に従って講じられたものであるときは、当該理由において、当該送信防止措置と当該基準との関係を明らかにしなければならない。

Article 28, paragraph (1), item (i)(発信者に対する通知等の措置)Measures such as Notification to SendersChanged

if the status of receipt relevant large-scale specified telecommunications service provider is the sender of requests under Article 23the information for which it took the transmission prevention measures;

第二十三条の申出の受付の状況当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が送信防止措置を講じた情報の発信者であるとき。

Article 28, paragraph (1), item (ii)(発信者に対する通知等の措置)Measures such as Notification to SendersChanged

the implementation status ofif it has taken notification under or similar measures in the provisions past with regard to having prevented the transmission of Article 25;similar information to the same sender for a similar reason, or if there is any other legitimate ground for not taking notification or similar measures.

第二十五条の規定による通知の実施状況過去に同一の発信者に対して同様の情報の送信を同様の理由により防止したことについて通知等の措置を講じていたときその他の通知等の措置を講じないことについて正当な理由があるとき。

Article 28, paragraph (1), item (iii)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Removed

the implementation status of notification or similar measures under the provisions of Article 27;

第二十七条の規定による通知等の措置の実施状況

Article 28, paragraph (1), item (iv)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Removed

the implementation status of transmission prevention measures (excluding the matters set forth in the preceding three items);

送信防止措置の実施状況(前三号に掲げる事項を除く。)

Article 28, paragraph (1), item (v)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Removed

the implementation status of the measures pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article;

前条第一項の規定による措置の実施状況

Article 28, paragraph (1), item (vi)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Removed

its own evaluation of the matters set forth in the preceding items;

前各号に掲げる事項について自ら行った評価

Article 28, paragraph (1), item (vii)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Removed

in addition to the matters set forth in the preceding items, the matters specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications as necessary to make clear the implementation status of the measures that a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider is to take based on the provisions of this Chapter.

前各号に掲げる事項のほか、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者がこの章の規定に基づき講ずべき措置の実施状況を明らかにするために必要な事項として総務省令で定める事項

Article 28-2第二十八条の二

Measures to Reduce Adverse Effects on the Fairness of Elections(選挙の公正に対する悪影響を軽減するための措置)
Article 28-2, paragraph (1)(選挙の公正に対する悪影響を軽減するための措置)

A large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must take necessary measures, in accordance with the characteristics of the large-scale specified telecommunications service, to reduce the adverse effects of the dissemination of information that violates laws and regulations, the dissemination of false information, the dissemination of information that distorts facts, and the dissemination of other information likely to harm the fairness of elections, among the dissemination of information through specified telecommunications conducted using the large-scale specified telecommunications service it provides.

大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、その提供する大規模特定電気通信役務を利用して行われる特定電気通信による情報の流通のうち、法令に違反する情報の流通、虚偽の情報の流通、事実をゆがめた情報の流通その他の選挙の公正を害するおそれのある情報の流通による悪影響を軽減するため、当該大規模特定電気通信役務の特性に応じ、必要な措置を講じなければならない。

Article 28-2, paragraph (2)(選挙の公正に対する悪影響を軽減するための措置)

The Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications is to establish guidelines necessary to contribute to the appropriate and effective implementation of the measures to be taken by large-scale specified telecommunications service providers pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

総務大臣は、前項の規定に基づき大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が講ずべき措置に関して、その適切かつ有効な実施に資するために必要な指針を定めるものとする。

Article 28-2, paragraph (3)(選挙の公正に対する悪影響を軽減するための措置)

When the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications has established or changed the guidelines under the preceding paragraph, the Minister must publish them without delay.

総務大臣は、前項の指針を定め、又は変更したときは、遅滞なく、これを公表しなければならない。

Article 29第二十九条Caption changed

Collection of ReportsPublication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.報告の徴収措置の実施状況等の公表
8 changes in this article
Article 29, paragraph (1)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Changed

The Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications may, to the extent necessary for the enforcement ofA large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must publish the provisions of Article 22, Article 24, Article 25, Article 26, paragraph (1) or (3), Article 27 orfollowing matters once a year, as provided by Order of the preceding Article, require a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider to make a report on its business.Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications:

総務大臣は、第二十二条、第二十四条、第二十五条、第二十六条第一項若しくは第三項、第二十七条又は前条の規定の施行に必要な限度において、大規大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、その業務に関し報告をさせることができるは、毎年一回、総務省令で定めるところにより、次に掲げる事項を公表しなければならない。

Article 29, paragraph (1), item (i)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Added

the status of acceptance of requests under Article 24;

第二十四条の申出の受付の状況

Article 29, paragraph (1), item (ii)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Added

the implementation status of notices pursuant to the provisions of Article 26;

第二十六条の規定による通知の実施状況

Article 29, paragraph (1), item (iii)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Added

the implementation status of notification or similar measures pursuant to the provisions of Article 28;

第二十八条の規定による通知等の措置の実施状況

Article 29, paragraph (1), item (iv)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Added

the implementation status of transmission prevention measures (excluding the matters set forth in the preceding three items);

送信防止措置の実施状況(前三号に掲げる事項を除く。)

Article 29, paragraph (1), item (v)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Added

the implementation status of the measures pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article;

前条第一項の規定による措置の実施状況

Article 29, paragraph (1), item (vi)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Added

its own evaluation of the matters set forth in the preceding items;

前各号に掲げる事項について自ら行った評価

Article 29, paragraph (1), item (vii)(措置の実施状況等の公表)Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Added

beyond the matters set forth in the preceding items, matters specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications as necessary for clarifying the implementation status of the measures to be taken by large-scale specified telecommunications service providers pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter.

前各号に掲げる事項のほか、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者がこの章の規定に基づき講ずべき措置の実施状況を明らかにするために必要な事項として総務省令で定める事項

Article 30第三十条Caption changed

Recommendation and OrderCollection of Reports勧告及び命令報告の徴収
2 changes in this article
Article 30, paragraph (1)(報告の徴収)Collection of ReportsChanged

When theThe Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications finds that a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider is in violationmay, to the extent necessary for the enforcement of the provisions of Article 2223, Article 2425, Article 2526, Article 2627, paragraph (1) or (3), Article 2728 or Article 28, the Minister may recommend to thatpreceding Article, have a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider that it take the measures necessary to rectify the violationmake a report on its business.

総務大臣は、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が第二十二三条、第二十四五条、第二十五六条、第二十六七条第一項若しくは第三項、第二十七八条又は第二十八前条の規定に違反していると認めるときは、当該の施行に必要な限度において、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、その違反を是正するために必要な措置を講ずべきことを勧告す業務に関し報告をさせることができる。

Article 30, paragraph (2)(勧告及び命令)Recommendation and OrderRemoved

If a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider that has received a recommendation under the preceding paragraph fails, without a justifiable reason, to take the measures pertaining to the recommendation, the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications may order that large-scale specified telecommunications service provider to take the measures pertaining to the recommendation.

総務大臣は、前項の規定による勧告を受けた大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が、正当な理由がなく当該勧告に係る措置を講じなかったときは、当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、当該勧告に係る措置を講ずべきことを命ずることができる。

Article 31第三十一条Caption changed

Document to be ServedRecommendation and Order送達すべき書類勧告及び命令
2 changes in this article
Article 31, paragraph (1)(勧告及び命令)Recommendation and OrderChanged

A designation under Article 20, paragraph (1), the collection of reports under the provisions of Article 29, a recommendation under paragraph (1)If the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications finds that a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider is in violation of the provisions of the precedingArticle 23, Article, or an order under 25, Article 26, Article 27, paragraph (2) of that1) or (3), Article is made by serving28 or Article 29, the document Minister may recommend that the large-scale specified by Order of telecommunications service provider take the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communicationsmeasures necessary to rectify the violation.

総務大臣は、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が第二十条第一項の規定による指定三条、第二十五条、第二十九条の規定による報告の徴収、前六条、第二十七条第一項の規定による勧告又は同条第二項若しくは第三項、第二十八条又は第二十九条の規定による命令は、総務省令で定める書類を送達して行う違反していると認めるときは、当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、その違反を是正するために必要な措置を講ずべきことを勧告することができる。

Article 31, paragraph (2)(勧告及び命令)Recommendation and OrderChanged

The notice under Article 30 of the Administrative Procedure Act (Act No. 88 of 1993) pertaining toIf a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider that has received a designation under Article 20, paragraph (1) or an orderrecommendation under paragraph (2)the provisions of the preceding Article is given by serving the document under that Article. In this caseparagraph fails, without legitimate grounds, to take the measures pertaining to the recommendation, the provisions of Article 15, paragraph (3) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuantMinister for Internal Affairs and Communications may order the large-scale specified telecommunications service provider to Article 31 of that Act withtake the terms deemedmeasures pertaining to be replaced do not applythe recommendation.

第二十条第一項の規定による指定又は前条第二総務大臣は、前項の規定による命令に係る行政手続法(平成五年法律第八十八号)第三十条の規定による通知は、同条の書類を送達して行う。この場合において、同法第三十一条において読み替えて準用する同法第十五条第三項の規定は適用しない勧告を受けた大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が、正当な理由がなく当該勧告に係る措置を講じなかったときは、当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、当該勧告に係る措置を講ずべきことを命ずることができる。

Article 32第三十二条Caption changed

Application Mutatis Mutandis of the Code of Civil Procedure to ServiceDocument to be Served送達に関する民事訴訟法の準用送達すべき書類
2 changes in this article
Article 32, paragraph (1)(送達すべき書類)Document to be ServedChanged

The designation under the provisions of Article 10021, paragraph (1), Article 101, Article 102-2, Article 103, Article 105, Article 106 and Article 108 of the Codecollection of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to servicereports under the preceding Article. In this caseprovisions of Article 30, the term "court" in that paragraph andrecommendation under the term "presiding judge" in that Article are deemed to be replaced with "Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications", andprovisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, or the term "court execution officer" in Article 101,order under the provisions of paragraph (12) of that ActArticle is deemed to be replaced with "official made by serving a document specified by Order of the Minister forMinistry of Internal Affairs and Communications".

前条第二十一条第一項の規定による送達については、民事訴訟法第百条第一項、第百一条、第百二条の二、第百三条、第百五条、第百六条及び第百八指定、第三十条の規定を準用する。この場合において、同項中「裁判所」とあり、及び同条中「裁判長」とあるのは「総務大臣」と、同法第百一条第一項中「執行官」とあるのは「総務大臣の職員」と読み替えるものとするによる報告の徴収、前条第一項の規定による勧告又は同条第二項の規定による命令は、総務省令で定める書類を送達して行う。

Article 32, paragraph (2)(送達すべき書類)Document to be ServedAdded

The notice under the provisions of Article 30 of the Administrative Procedure Act (Act No. 88 of 1993) pertaining to the designation under the provisions of Article 21, paragraph (1) or the order under the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article is given by serving the document referred to in Article 30 of that Act. In this case, the provisions of Article 15, paragraph (3) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to Article 31 of that Act do not apply.

第二十一条第一項の規定による指定又は前条第二項の規定による命令に係る行政手続法(平成五年法律第八十八号)第三十条の規定による通知は、同条の書類を送達して行う。この場合において、同法第三十一条において読み替えて準用する同法第十五条第三項の規定は適用しない。

Article 33第三十三条Caption changed

Service by PublicationApplication Mutatis Mutandis of the Code of Civil Procedure to Service公示送達送達に関する民事訴訟法の準用
7 changes in this article
Article 33, paragraph (1)(送達に関する民事訴訟法の準用)Application Mutatis Mutandis of the Code of Civil Procedure to ServiceChanged

The provisions of Article 100, paragraph (1), Article 101, Article 102-2, Article 103, Article 105, Article 106 and Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to service under the provisions of the preceding Article. In this case, the term "court" in Article 100, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure and the term "presiding judge" in Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure are deemed to be replaced with "Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications may effect service by publication ", and the term "court execution officer" in Article 101, paragraph (1) of the following cases:Code of Civil Procedure is deemed to be replaced with "official of the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications".

総務大臣は、次に掲げる場合には、公示送達をすることができ前条の規定による送達については、民事訴訟法第百条第一項、第百一条、第百二条の二、第百三条、第百五条、第百六条及び第百八条の規定を準用する。この場合において、同項中「裁判所」とあり、及び同条中「裁判長」とあるのは「総務大臣」と、同法第百一条第一項中「執行官」とあるのは「総務大臣の職員」と読み替えるものとする。

Article 33, paragraph (1), item (i)(公示送達)Service by PublicationRemoved

if the domicile or residence of the person to be served or the place where service is to be effected is unknown;

送達を受けるべき者の住所、居所その他送達をすべき場所が知れない場合

Article 33, paragraph (1), item (ii)(公示送達)Service by PublicationRemoved

if it is found that, with regard to service to be effected in a foreign country, it is impossible to follow the provisions of Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with the terms replaced pursuant to the preceding Article, or that service cannot be effected even by following those provisions;

外国においてすべき送達について、前条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定によることができず、又はこれによっても送達をすることができないと認めるべき場合

Article 33, paragraph (1), item (iii)(公示送達)Service by PublicationRemoved

if six months have passed since a commission was issued to the competent government agency of a foreign country pursuant to the provisions of Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with the terms replaced pursuant to the preceding Article, and no document proving the service has been sent.

前条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定により外国の管轄官庁に嘱託を発した後六月を経過してもその送達を証する書面の送付がない場合

Article 33, paragraph (2)(公示送達)Service by PublicationRemoved

Service by publication is carried out by taking measures to place in a state where it can be viewed by unspecified and numerous persons, by the method specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the effect that the documents to be served will be delivered to the person to be served at any time, and to place in a state where it can be viewed a document stating that effect posted on the bulletin board of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, or that effect displayed on the screen of a computer installed at an office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.

公示送達は、送達をすべき書類を送達を受けるべき者にいつでも交付すべき旨を総務省令で定める方法により不特定多数の者が閲覧することができる状態に置くとともに、その旨が記載された書面を総務省の掲示場に掲示し、又はその旨を総務省の事務所に設置した電子計算機の映像面に表示したものの閲覧をすることができる状態に置く措置をとることにより行う。

Article 33, paragraph (3)(公示送達)Service by PublicationRemoved

Service by publication takes effect upon the lapse of two weeks from the day on which the measures were commenced under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

公示送達は、前項の規定による措置を開始した日から二週間を経過することによって、その効力を生ずる。

Article 33, paragraph (4)(公示送達)Service by PublicationRemoved

In the case of service by publication made in respect of service to be effected in a foreign country, the period referred to in the preceding paragraph is six weeks.

外国においてすべき送達についてした公示送達にあっては、前項の期間は、六週間とする。

Article 34第三十四条Caption changed

Use of Electronic Data Processing SystemsService by Publication電子情報処理組織の使用公示送達
7 changes in this article
Article 34, paragraph (1)(公示送達)Service by PublicationChanged

If an employee of theThe Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications has handled affairs relating to a disposition notice, etc. prescribed in Article 3, item (ix) of the Act on the Advancement of Government Administration Processes That Utilize Information and Communications Technology (Act No. 151 of 2002) that is to be given by serving a document pursuant to the provisions of Article 31, using the electronic data processing system prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of that Act pursuant to Article 7, paragraph (1) of that Act, the employee must, in lieu of preparing and submitting a document stating the matters concerningmay effect service under the provisions of Article 100, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with the terms replaced pursuant to Article 32, record those matters, using that electronic data processing system,by publication in a file kept on a computer (including input-output devices) used by the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications.following cases:

総務大臣の職員が、情報通信技術を活用した行政の推進等に関する法律(平成十四年法律第百五十一号)第三条第九号に規定する処分通知等であって第三十一条の規定により書類を送達して行うこととしているものに関する事務を、同法第七条第一項の規定により同法第六条第一項に規定する電子情報処理組織を使用して行ったときは、第三十二条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百条第一項の規定による送達に関する事項を記載した書面の作成及び提出に代えて、当該事項を当該電子情報処理組織を使用して総務大臣の使用に係る電子計算機(入出力装置を含む。)に備えられたファイルに記録しなければならないは、次に掲げる場合には、公示送達をすることができる。

Article 34, paragraph (1), item (i)(公示送達)Service by PublicationAdded

if the domicile, residence or other place where service is to be effected of the person to be served is unknown;

送達を受けるべき者の住所、居所その他送達をすべき場所が知れない場合

Article 34, paragraph (1), item (ii)(公示送達)Service by PublicationAdded

with regard to service to be effected in a foreign country, if it is found that service cannot be effected by the means prescribed in Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to the preceding Article, or that service cannot be effected even by those means;

外国においてすべき送達について、前条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定によることができず、又はこれによっても送達をすることができないと認めるべき場合

Article 34, paragraph (1), item (iii)(公示送達)Service by PublicationAdded

if no document certifying the service has been sent even after six months have passed since a commission was issued to the competent government agency of a foreign country pursuant to the provisions of Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to the preceding Article.

前条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定により外国の管轄官庁に嘱託を発した後六月を経過してもその送達を証する書面の送付がない場合

Article 34, paragraph (2)(公示送達)Service by PublicationAdded

Service by publication is effected by taking measures to put in a state where an unspecified large number of persons can view, by a method specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the fact that the document to be served will be delivered to the person to be served at any time, and also to post a document stating that fact on the bulletin board of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, or to put in a state where what is displayed to that effect on the screen of a computer installed in the office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications can be viewed.

公示送達は、送達をすべき書類を送達を受けるべき者にいつでも交付すべき旨を総務省令で定める方法により不特定多数の者が閲覧することができる状態に置くとともに、その旨が記載された書面を総務省の掲示場に掲示し、又はその旨を総務省の事務所に設置した電子計算機の映像面に表示したものの閲覧をすることができる状態に置く措置をとることにより行う。

Article 34, paragraph (3)(公示送達)Service by PublicationAdded

Service by publication takes effect upon the lapse of two weeks from the date on which the measures under the provisions of the preceding paragraph were commenced.

公示送達は、前項の規定による措置を開始した日から二週間を経過することによって、その効力を生ずる。

Article 34, paragraph (4)(公示送達)Service by PublicationAdded

The period stated in the preceding paragraph is six weeks for service by publication that is done for service that would be effected in a foreign country.

外国においてすべき送達についてした公示送達にあっては、前項の期間は、六週間とする。

Article 35第三十五条Caption added

Use of Electronic Data Processing Systems

電子情報処理組織の使用

1 change in this article
Article 35, paragraph (1)(電子情報処理組織の使用)Use of Electronic Data Processing SystemsChanged

IfWhen an order underofficial of the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications has conducted, using the electronic data processing system prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Advancement of Government Administration Processes That Utilize Information and Communications Technology (Act No. 151 of 2002) pursuant to the provisions of Article 307, paragraph (2) is violated, a person who has committed said violation 1) of that Act, affairs relating to a notice of disposition, etc. prescribed in Article 3, item (ix) of that Act that is subject to be given by serving a document pursuant to imprisonment for not more than one year or a fine the provisions of Article 32, the official must, instead of preparing and submitting a document stating the particulars relating to service under the provisions of not more than one million yenArticle 100, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to Article 33, record those particulars, using that electronic data processing system, in a file provided on a computer (including input-output devices) used by the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications.

第三十条第二項総務大臣の職員が、情報通信技術を活用した行政の推進等に関する法律(平成十四年法律第百五十一号)第三条第九号に規定する処分通知等であって第三十二条の規定による命令に違反した場合には、当該違反行為をした者は、一年以下の拘禁刑又は百万円以下の罰金に処するり書類を送達して行うこととしているものに関する事務を、同法第七条第一項の規定により同法第六条第一項に規定する電子情報処理組織を使用して行ったときは、第三十三条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百条第一項の規定による送達に関する事項を記載した書面の作成及び提出に代えて、当該事項を当該電子情報処理組織を使用して総務大臣の使用に係る電子計算機(入出力装置を含む。)に備えられたファイルに記録しなければならない。

Change 1 of 57
© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy