The law as Act on the Arrangement, etc. of Related Acts upon the Enforcement of the Act on Security Assignment Contracts and Retention of Title Contracts (Act No. 57 of 2025) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.
The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
Article 34第三十四条
Action Opposing the Granting of an Attestation of Enforceability(執行文付与に対する異議の訴え)
Article 34, paragraph (1)
When an attestation of enforceability has been granted pursuant to the provisions of Article 27, an obligor who disputes that a fact to be proved by the obligee has occurred or objects to it being permissible to carry out judicial enforcement for or against a person other than the party indicated in the title of obligation may file an action opposing the granting of an attestation of enforceability to call for the court to disallow judicial enforcement based on the authenticated copy of the title of obligation bearing that attestation of enforceability.
If there are several grounds for opposition, an obligor must allege those grounds at the same time.
異議の事由が数個あるときは、債務者は、同時に、これを主張しなければならない。
Article 34, paragraph (3)
The provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the action stated in paragraph (1).
前条第二項の規定は、第一項の訴えについて準用する。
Article 35第三十五条
Action to Dispute a Claim(請求異議の訴え)
Article 35, paragraph (1)
An obligor who disputes the existence or content of the claim under a title of obligation (excluding a title of obligation stated in Article 22, item (ii), or items (iii)-2 through (iv) which has yet to become final and binding; the same applies in this paragraph) may file an action to dispute the claim to call for the court to disallow judicial enforcement based on that title of obligation. The same applies for an obligor who disputes the establishment of a title of obligation not constituting a judicial decision.
Grounds to dispute a final and binding judgment are limited to those that arise after the conclusion of oral arguments.
確定判決についての異議の事由は、口頭弁論の終結後に生じたものに限る。
Article 35, paragraph (3)
The provisions of Article 33, paragraph (2) and paragraph (2) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the action stated in paragraph (1).
第三十三条第二項及び前条第二項の規定は、第一項の訴えについて準用する。
Article 36第三十六条
Judicial Decision Staying Enforcement in Connection with an Action Opposing the Granting of an Attestation of Enforceability(執行文付与に対する異議の訴え等に係る執行停止の裁判)
Article 36, paragraph (1)
If an action opposing the granting of an attestation of enforceability or an action to dispute a claim has been filed, and if the circumstances that the person alleges for raising the opposition or dispute appear to be legally well-grounded and a prima facie showing is made on factual matters, the court in charge of the case, upon petition, may order a stay of enforcement until a judicial decision as referred to in paragraph (1) of the following Article is made in the final judgment, while either requiring or not requiring security to be provided, or, in addition to the order, may issue an order for judicial enforcement to continue while requiring security to be provided, or may issue an order voiding an enforcement measure that has already been taken while requiring security to be provided. If there are pressing circumstances, the presiding judge may also order these measures.
The court may render a judicial decision on the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph without hearing oral arguments.
前項の申立てについての裁判は、口頭弁論を経ないですることができる。
Article 36, paragraph (3)
If the grounds prescribed in paragraph (1) exist, if there are pressing circumstances, the enforcement court, upon petition, may order the measures prescribed in that paragraph, while specifying a period for submitting an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a judicial decision under that paragraph. This judicial decision may also be made before the filing of an action opposing the granting of an attestation of enforceability or an action to dispute a claim.
When the period specified pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph has expired or when a judicial decision under paragraph (1) has been submitted to the enforcement court or court enforcement officer within the period, the judicial decision stated in the preceding paragraph ceases to be effective.
No appeal may be entered against a judicial decision on the petition referred to in paragraph (1) or paragraph (3).
第一項又は第三項の申立てについての裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。
Article 37第三十七条
Judicial Decision to Stay Enforcement in the Final Judgment(終局判決における執行停止の裁判等)
Article 37, paragraph (1)
In the final judgment on an action opposing the granting of an attestation of enforceability or an action to dispute a claim, the court in charge of the case may order the measures prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article or void, change, or approve a judicial decision under that paragraph that has already been made. The court must make a declaration of provisional enforcement for this judicial decision.
A third party who has ownership of the subject matter of judicial enforcement or any other right that obstructs assignment or delivery of the subject matter may file, against the obligee, a third-party action opposing enforcement to call for the court to disallow enforcement.
The third party prescribed in the preceding paragraph may file an action against the obligor regarding the subject matter of judicial enforcement, in consolidation with the action referred to in that paragraph.
The action referred to in paragraph (1) is under the jurisdiction of the enforcement court.
第一項の訴えは、執行裁判所が管轄する。
Article 38, paragraph (4)
The provisions of the preceding two Articles apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial decision to stay enforcement in connection with the action referred to in paragraph (1).
前二条の規定は、第一項の訴えに係る執行停止の裁判について準用する。
Article 39第三十九条
Stay of Judicial Enforcement(強制執行の停止)
Article 39, paragraph (1)
Judicial enforcement must be stayed if any of the following documents has been submitted:
強制執行は、次に掲げる文書の提出があつたときは、停止しなければならない。
Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i)
an enforceable authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a judicial decision containing a statement that a title of obligation (excluding a notarial instrument authorizing enforcement) or a declaration of provisional enforcement is revoked or a statement that judicial enforcement is not permitted;
an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a final and binding judgment declaring a settlement, acknowledgment, mediation or labor tribunal decision that a title of obligation concerns to be invalid;
an authenticated copy of a record or any other document prepared by a court clerk which proves that any of the titles of obligation stated in Article 22, item (ii) through (iv)-2 has ceased to be effective due to withdrawal of the action or any other grounds;
an authenticated copy of a record, or a certificate of recorded information of an electronic record (meaning an electronic record prescribed in Article 160, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure; the same applies in Article 167-2, paragraph (1), item (iv)), of a judicial settlement in which it is indicated that the obligation will not be enforced or that the petition for enforcement is withdrawn;
an authenticated copy of a record of mediation, or of a written tribunal decision of a labor tribunal decision that has the same effect as a judicial settlement pursuant to the provisions of Article 21, paragraph (4) of the Labor Tribunal Act (Act No. 45 of 2004) or of the record referred to in Article 20, paragraph (7) of that Act, indicating that the obligation will not be enforced or that the petition for enforcement is withdrawn;
a document proving that security for avoiding judicial enforcement has been provided;
強制執行を免れるための担保を立てたことを証する文書
Article 39, paragraph (1), item (vi)
an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a judicial decision in which the court has indicated that it is issuing an order staying enforcement and voiding an enforcement measure;
強制執行の停止及び執行処分の取消しを命ずる旨を記載した裁判の正本又は記録事項証明書
Article 39, paragraph (1), item (vii)
an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a judicial decision in which the court has indicated that it is issuing an order for a temporarily staying enforcement; or
強制執行の一時の停止を命ずる旨を記載した裁判の正本又は記録事項証明書
Article 39, paragraph (1), item (viii)
a document indicating that, after the establishment of a title of obligation, the obligee has had their claim satisfied or consented to granting a grace period for performance.
債権者が、債務名義の成立後に、弁済を受け、又は弁済の猶予を承諾した旨を記載した文書
Article 39, paragraph (2)
A stay of judicial enforcement based on submission of a document stated in item (viii) of the preceding paragraph which contains a statement that an obligee received performance is limited to a period of four weeks.
A stay of judicial enforcement based on submission of a document stated in paragraph (1), item (viii) which contains a statement that an obligee consented to granting a grace period for performance may be effected only twice, and the total period may not exceed six months.
If a document stated in paragraph (1), items (i) through (vi) of the preceding Article has been submitted, the enforcement court or court enforcement officer must void even an enforcement measure that has already been taken.
The provisions of Article 12 do not apply if the enforcement court or court enforcement officer voids an enforcement disposition pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
第十二条の規定は、前項の規定により執行処分を取り消す場合については適用しない。
Article 41第四十一条
Continuation of Judicial Enforcement If the Obligor Has Died(債務者が死亡した場合の強制執行の続行)
Article 41, paragraph (1)
Judicial enforcement may be continued even if the obligor died after its commencement.
強制執行は、その開始後に債務者が死亡した場合においても、続行することができる。
Article 41, paragraph (2)
In the cases of the preceding paragraph, if existence of an heir to the obligor or the whereabouts of this person is unknown, the enforcement court may, upon petition, appoint a special representative for the inherited property or heir.
The provisions of Article 35, paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the special representative referred to in the preceding paragraph.
民事訴訟法第三十五条第二項及び第三項の規定は、前項の特別代理人について準用する。
Article 42第四十二条
Sharing of Enforcement Costs(執行費用の負担)
Article 42, paragraph (1)
The cost of judicial enforcement that is necessary (referred to as "enforcement cost" below) is borne by the obligor.
強制執行の費用で必要なもの(以下「執行費用」という。)は、債務者の負担とする。
Article 42, paragraph (2)
In judicial enforcement of claim for payment of money, the enforcement cost may be collected simultaneously in the course of the enforcement procedures without requiring a title of obligation.
When a judicial decision revoking a title of obligation (excluding a notarial instrument authorizing enforcement) on which enforcement is based, or a judgment declaring invalidity of a settlement, acknowledgment, mediation or labor tribunal decision that a title of obligation concerns has become final and binding, the obligee must return, to the obligor, money equivalent to the enforcement cost that has been paid to the obligee.
The enforcement cost to be borne by an obligor pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), other than that collected pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2), and the amount of money to be returned by an obligee pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph are established by a court clerk of the enforcement court, upon petition.
A person may file an objection with the enforcement court to the court clerk's disposition concerning a petition under the preceding paragraph, within an inalterable period of one week from the day on which the person is notified of it.
If the enforcement court finds there to be grounds to the filing of an objection to a court clerk's disposition under paragraph (4), and the enforcement cost and the amount of money to be returned prescribed in that paragraph are required to be established, the court must establish those amounts itself.
An appeal against an enforcement decision may be filed against an order on the filing of an objection under the provisions of paragraph (5).
第五項の規定による異議の申立てについての決定に対しては、執行抗告をすることができる。
Article 42, paragraph (8)
A court clerk's disposition under paragraph (4) does not become effective until it becomes final and binding.
第四項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。
Article 42, paragraph (9)
The provisions of Article 74, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to a court clerk's disposition under paragraph (4). In this case, the provisions of paragraphs (5) and (7) and the preceding paragraph, and of Article 74, paragraph (3) of that Code, apply mutatis mutandis.