Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt on a date not yet set

Read the text in force →

Financial Instruments and Exchange Act

金融商品取引法(きんゆうしょうひんとりひきほう)

Chapter VI-2 Administrative Monetary Penalty (Articles 179 to 185-6)

The law as Act Partially Amending the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and the Payment Services Act (Act No. 64 of 2026) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

Article 179第百七十九条

Record of the Decision to Commence Trial Procedures(審判手続開始決定記録)
Article 179, paragraph (1)

When the Prime Minister has made the decision under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, the Prime Minister must, as provided by Cabinet Office Order, record the electronic or magnetic record pertaining to that decision (referred to as the "record of the decision to commence trial procedures" in the following paragraph, paragraph (3) and Article 183) in a file stored on the computer used by the Cabinet Office (including input and output devices; the same applies hereinafter in this Section) (hereinafter, except in Article 185-12, paragraph (2), items (ii) and (iii), simply referred to as the "file" in this Section).

内閣総理大臣は、前条第一項の決定をした場合においては、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該決定に係る電磁的記録(次項及び第三項並びに第百八十三条において「審判手続開始決定記録」という。)を内閣府の使用に係る電子計算機(入出力装置を含む。以下この節において同じ。)に備えられたファイル(第百八十五条の十二第二項第二号及び第三号を除き、以下この節において単に「ファイル」という。)に記録しなければならない。

Article 179, paragraph (2)

The record of the decision to commence trial procedures must record the first date for trial procedures and the place, the facts set forth in the items of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article which are connected with the administrative monetary penalty, the amount of the administrative monetary penalty that is required to be paid, and the basis for its calculation.

審判手続開始決定記録には、最初の審判手続の期日及び場所、課徴金に係る前条第一項各号に掲げる事実並びに納付すべき課徴金の額及びその計算の基礎を記録しなければならない。

Article 179, paragraph (3)

Trial procedures are commenced through the service of the record of the decision to commence trial procedures on the person that would be ordered to pay the administrative monetary penalty (hereinafter referred to as the "respondent" in this Section).

審判手続は、課徴金の納付を命じようとする者(以下この節において「被審人」という。)に審判手続開始決定記録を送達することにより、開始する。

Article 179, paragraph (4)

A respondent must be ordered to appear on the first date for trial procedures.

被審人には、最初の審判手続の期日に出頭すべき旨を命じなければならない。

Article 180第百八十条

Trial Procedures(審判手続)
Article 180, paragraph (1)

Trial procedures (other than the decision to commence trial procedures and a decision under Article 185-7, paragraph (19)) are conducted by a panel composed of three trial examiners; provided, however, that in a simple case, the procedures are conducted by a single trial examiner.

審判手続(審判手続開始の決定及び第百八十五条の七第十九項に規定する決定を除く。)は、三人の審判官をもつて構成する合議体が行う。ただし、簡易な事件については、一人の審判官が行う。

Article 180, paragraph (2)

For each trial case, the Prime Minister must designate the trial examiners composing the panel referred to in the main clause of the preceding paragraph, or the single trial examiner referred to in the proviso to that paragraph.

内閣総理大臣は、各審判事件について、前項本文の合議体を構成する審判官又は同項ただし書の一人の審判官を指定しなければならない。

Article 180, paragraph (3)

If the Prime Minister decides to have a panel conduct trial procedures, the Prime Minister must designate one chief trial examiner from among the trial examiners designated pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

内閣総理大臣は、合議体に審判手続を行わせることとしたときは、前項の規定により指定した審判官のうち一人を審判長として指定しなければならない。

Article 180, paragraph (4)

The Prime Minister may not designate a person that has participated in the investigation of the case as a trial examiner.

内閣総理大臣は、当該事件について調査に関与したことのある者を審判官として指定することはできない。

Article 180-2第百八十条の二

Trial Procedures Conducted by Means of Calls Using Transmission and Reception of Video and Audio(映像と音声の送受信による通話の方法による審判手続)
Article 180-2, paragraph (1)

If the trial examiners find it appropriate, they may, after hearing the opinion of the respondent, conduct trial procedures, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Order, by a method that enables the trial examiners and the respondent to converse while mutually recognizing each other's condition through the transmission and reception of video and audio.

審判官は、相当と認めるときは、被審人の意見を聴いて、内閣府令で定めるところにより、審判官及び被審人が映像と音声の送受信により相手の状態を相互に認識しながら通話をすることができる方法によつて、審判手続を行うことができる。

Article 180-2, paragraph (2)

In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the respondent is deemed to have appeared on the date for trial procedures.

前項の場合には、当該被審人は、審判手続の期日に出頭したものとみなす。

Article 181第百八十一条

Representative of the Respondent(被審人の代理人等)
Article 181, paragraph (1)

A respondent may appoint as its representative an attorney-at-law, legal professional corporation, attorney-at-law and registered foreign lawyer joint corporation, or an appropriate person that has been approved by the Prime Minister.

被審人は、弁護士、弁護士法人、弁護士・外国法事務弁護士共同法人又は内閣総理大臣の承認を得た適当な者を代理人とすることができる。

Article 181, paragraph (2)

The Prime Minister may have relevant officials the Prime Minister has designated (hereinafter each of those officials is referred to as a "designated official" in this Article) participate in trial procedures.

内閣総理大臣は、当該職員でその指定するもの(以下この条において「指定職員」という。)を審判手続に参加させることができる。

Article 181, paragraph (3)

A designated official may attend trial procedures, and offer evidence and perform other necessary acts.

指定職員は、審判手続に立ち会い、証拠の申出その他必要な行為をすることができる。

Article 181, paragraph (4)

A designated official may, when finding it necessary to change any facts listed in the items of Article 178, paragraph (1), the application of laws or regulations, the amount of administrative monetary penalty to be paid or the basis for its calculation (limited to the extent specified by Cabinet Office Order), claim that the change be made; provided, however, that this does not apply if the change will impair the interests of the respondent.

指定職員は、第百七十八条第一項各号に掲げる事実、法令の適用並びに納付すべき課徴金の額及びその計算の基礎について変更(内閣府令で定める範囲のものに限る。)の必要があると認めるときは、これを主張することができる。ただし、被審人の利益を害することとなる場合は、この限りでない。

Article 182第百八十二条

Opening of Dates for Trial Procedures to the Public(審判手続の期日の公開)
Article 182, paragraph (1)

Dates for trial procedures are opened to the public; provided, however, that this does not apply if it is found to be necessary not to do so in the public interest.

審判手続の期日は、公開して行う。ただし、公益上必要があると認めるときは、この限りでない。

Article 183第百八十三条

Written Answer(答弁書)
Article 183, paragraph (1)

Upon being served with the record of the decision to commence trial procedures, the respondent must submit a written answer to this to the trial examiners without delay.

被審人は、審判手続開始決定記録の送達を受けたときは、これに対する答弁書を、遅滞なく、審判官に提出しなければならない。

Article 183, paragraph (2)

If a respondent submits, before the first date for trial procedures recorded in the record of the decision to commence trial procedures (or, if that date is changed, the new date), a written answer acknowledging the facts set forth in the items of Article 178, paragraph (1) related to the administrative monetary penalty and acknowledging the amount of the administrative monetary penalty that is required to be paid, it is not necessary to hold a date for trial procedures.

被審人が、審判手続開始決定記録に記録された最初の審判手続の期日(当該期日が変更された場合にあつては、変更後の期日)前に、課徴金に係る第百七十八条第一項各号に掲げる事実及び納付すべき課徴金の額を認める旨の答弁書を提出したときは、審判手続の期日を開くことを要しない。

Article 184第百八十四条

Statement of Opinions(意見の陳述)
Article 184, paragraph (1)

A respondent may state an opinion when appearing on the date for trial procedures.

被審人は、審判手続の期日に出頭して、意見を述べることができる。

Article 184, paragraph (2)

If a trial examiner finds it necessary, the trial examiner may request the respondent to state an opinion.

審判官は、必要があると認めるときは、被審人に対して、意見の陳述を求めることができる。

Article 185第百八十五条

Hearing of a Witness(参考人に対する審問)
Article 185, paragraph (1)

A trial examiner may order a witness to appear and conduct a hearing of the witness, at the petition of the respondent or ex officio. In such a case, the respondent may also question the witness.

審判官は、被審人の申立てにより又は職権で、参考人に出頭を求めて審問することができる。この場合においては、被審人も、その参考人に質問することができる。

Article 185, paragraph (2)

In the following cases, if a trial examiner finds it appropriate, the trial examiner may, as provided by Cabinet Office Order, conduct the hearing under the provisions of the preceding paragraph by a method that enables the trial examiner, the respondent, and the witness to speak with each other while recognizing each other's condition through the transmission and reception of images and sound. In this case, the respondent may also question the witness by that method.

審判官は、次に掲げる場合であつて、相当と認めるときは、内閣府令で定めるところにより、審判官、被審人及び参考人が映像と音声の送受信により相手の状態を相互に認識しながら通話をすることができる方法によつて、前項の規定による審問をすることができる。この場合においては、被審人も、当該方法によつて、その参考人に質問することができる。

Article 185, paragraph (2), item (i)

where the trial examiner finds that it is difficult for the witness to appear on the date for trial procedures due to the witness's address, age, or physical or mental condition, or other circumstances;

参考人の住所、年齢又は心身の状態その他の事情により、参考人が審判手続の期日に出頭することが困難であると認める場合

Article 185, paragraph (2), item (ii)

where the trial examiner finds, in light of the nature of the case, the witness's age or physical or mental condition, the relationship between the witness and the respondent, or other circumstances, that there is a risk that, if the witness were to make a statement in the place where the trial examiner and the respondent are present to examine the witness, the witness would be placed under pressure and have the witness's peace of mind significantly impaired; or

事案の性質、参考人の年齢又は心身の状態、参考人と被審人との関係その他の事情により、参考人が審判官及び被審人が参考人を審問するために在席する場所において陳述するときは圧迫を受け精神の平穏を著しく害されるおそれがあると認める場合

Article 185, paragraph (2), item (iii)

where the respondent has no objection.

被審人に異議がない場合

Article 185, paragraph (3)

In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, the witness is deemed to have appeared on the date for trial procedures.

前項の場合には、当該参考人は、審判手続の期日に出頭したものとみなす。

Article 185, paragraph (4)

The provisions of Article 190, Article 191, Article 196, Article 197, and Article 201, paragraphs (1) through (4) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 109 of 1996) apply mutatis mutandis to the procedures of a hearing of a witness pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2).

民事訴訟法(平成八年法律第百九号)第百九十条、第百九十一条、第百九十六条、第百九十七条及び第二百一条第一項から第四項までの規定は、第一項及び第二項の規定により参考人を審問する手続について準用する。

Article 185-2第百八十五条の二

Hearing of the Respondent(被審人に対する審問)
Article 185-2, paragraph (1)

A trial examiner may conduct a hearing of the respondent at the petition of the respondent or ex officio.

審判官は、被審人の申立てにより又は職権で、被審人を審問することができる。

Article 185-2, paragraph (2)

In the following cases, if a trial examiner finds it appropriate, the trial examiner may, as provided by Cabinet Office Order, conduct the hearing under the provisions of the preceding paragraph by a method that enables the trial examiner and the respondent to speak with each other while recognizing each other's condition through the transmission and reception of images and sound.

審判官は、次に掲げる場合であつて、相当と認めるときは、内閣府令で定めるところにより、審判官及び被審人が映像と音声の送受信により相手の状態を相互に認識しながら通話をすることができる方法によつて、前項の規定による審問をすることができる。

Article 185-2, paragraph (2), item (i)

where the trial examiner finds that it is difficult for the respondent to appear on the date for trial procedures due to the respondent's address, age, or physical or mental condition, or other circumstances;

被審人の住所、年齢又は心身の状態その他の事情により、被審人が審判手続の期日に出頭することが困難であると認める場合

Article 185-2, paragraph (2), item (ii)

where the trial examiner finds, in light of the nature of the case, the respondent's age or physical or mental condition, or other circumstances, that there is a risk that, if the respondent were to make a statement in the place where the trial examiner is present to examine the respondent, the respondent would be placed under pressure and have the respondent's peace of mind significantly impaired; or

事案の性質、被審人の年齢又は心身の状態その他の事情により、被審人が審判官が被審人を審問するために在席する場所において陳述するときは圧迫を受け精神の平穏を著しく害されるおそれがあると認める場合

Article 185-2, paragraph (2), item (iii)

where the respondent has no objection.

被審人に異議がない場合

Article 185-3第百八十五条の三

Submission of Documentary Evidence(証拠書類等の提出)
Article 185-3, paragraph (1)

A respondent may submit documentary evidence or an article of evidence during the course of trial procedures; provided, however, that if the trial examiners designate a reasonable period for the respondent to submit documentary evidence or an article of evidence, the respondent must submit it within that designated period.

被審人は、審判手続において、証拠書類又は証拠物を提出することができる。ただし、審判官が証拠書類又は証拠物を提出すべき相当の期間を定めたときは、その期間内に提出しなければならない。

Article 185-3, paragraph (2)

Trial examiners may order the possessor of a document or other articles to submit that article and retain the submitted article, at the petition of the respondent or ex officio.

審判官は、被審人の申立てにより又は職権で、書類その他の物件の所持人に対し、その物件の提出を求め、かつ、その提出された物件を留め置くことができる。

Article 185-3, paragraph (3)

With regard to an object submitted pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph (limited to the documents, etc. prescribed in Article 132-10, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure), the provisions of Article 132-13 (excluding the items) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 185-13 do not apply.

前項の規定により提出された物件(民事訴訟法第百三十二条の十第一項に規定する書面等に限る。)については、第百八十五条の十三において準用する同法第百三十二条の十三(各号を除く。)の規定は、適用しない。

Article 185-4第百八十五条の四

Order to Present an Expert Opinion Issued to a Person with Relevant Expertise(学識経験者に対する鑑定命令)
Article 185-4, paragraph (1)

Trial examiners may order a person with relevant expertise to present an expert opinion, at the petition of the respondent or ex officio.

審判官は、被審人の申立てにより又は職権で、学識経験を有する者に鑑定を命ずることができる。

Article 185-4, paragraph (2)

If trial examiners order an expert to appear in order to conduct a hearing, the respondent may also ask questions to that expert.

審判官が鑑定人に出頭を求めて審問する場合においては、被審人も、その鑑定人に質問することができる。

Article 185-4, paragraph (3)

If a trial examiner finds it appropriate, the trial examiner may, as provided by Cabinet Office Order, conduct the hearing under the provisions of the preceding paragraph by a method that enables the trial examiner, the respondent, and the expert to speak with each other while recognizing each other's condition through the transmission and reception of images and sound. In this case, the respondent may also question the expert by that method.

審判官は、相当と認めるときは、内閣府令で定めるところにより、審判官、被審人及び鑑定人が映像と音声の送受信により相手の状態を相互に認識しながら通話をすることができる方法によつて、前項の規定による審問をすることができる。この場合においては、被審人も、当該方法によつて、その鑑定人に質問することができる。

Article 185-4, paragraph (4)

The provisions of Article 191, Article 197, Article 201, paragraph (1), and Article 212 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the procedures for ordering an expert to present an expert opinion pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1).

民事訴訟法第百九十一条、第百九十七条、第二百一条第一項及び第二百十二条の規定は、第一項の規定により鑑定人に鑑定を命ずる手続について準用する。

Article 185-5第百八十五条の五

On-Site Inspections(立入検査)
Article 185-5, paragraph (1)

Trial examiners may enter the business office of a persons concerned in a case and other necessary place to inspect the books, documents, and any other articles, at the petition of the respondent or ex officio.

審判官は、被審人の申立てにより又は職権で、事件関係人の営業所その他必要な場所に立ち入り、帳簿書類その他の物件を検査することができる。

Article 185-6第百八十五条の六

Submission of a Draft Decision(決定案の提出)
Article 185-6, paragraph (1)

After the completion of trial procedures, trial examiners must prepare a draft decision on a trial case and submit the draft decision to the Prime Minister.

審判官は、審判手続を経た後、審判事件についての決定案を作成し、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy