Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

In force since 1 April 2026

Act on Building Unit Ownership

建物の区分所有等に関する法律(たてもののくぶんしょゆうとうにかんするほうりつ)

Amended by

Act Partially Amending the Act on Building Unit Ownership, etc. to Facilitate Management and Revitalization of Aging Condominiums, etc.

老朽化マンション等の管理及び再生の円滑化等を図るための建物の区分所有等に関する法律等の一部を改正する法律

The whole text as amended, on e-Gov

The same amending law also changes

  • 30 May 2025 — This law

61 provisions changed · 274 provisions added · 10 provisions removed · 6 provisions in the supplementary provisions · 2 articles renumbered

Each provision the amendment changes, before and after in one: words it removes are struck through, words it adds are highlighted. The Japanese is the law; the icon beside each English column says whose English it is. The 2 articles it renumbers are marked with the number each had before.

Article 82 · Resolutions to Approve Reconstruction If a Building Located in a Housing Complex Has Been Destroyed第八十二条(団地内の建物が滅失した場合における建替え承認決議)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 82, paragraph (1)

    In the case prescribed in Article 78, if the land on which a specific building other than the destroyed buildings (hereinafter referred to as a "specific building" in this Article and the following Article) is located (including rights related to that land) is co-owned by the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex, and, where the requirements specified in the following items for the categories of cases set forth in those items are satisfied, a resolution of approval (referred to as a "resolution to approve reconstruction" in the following paragraph and paragraph (3)) has been obtained by at least a three-fourths majority of the voting rights of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. present at a meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. consisting of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex who are co-owners of that land (including rights related to it), at which owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. who hold a majority of the voting rights (or, if a higher proportion is specified in the bylaws referred to in Article 30, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79, at least that proportion) are present, the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of that specific building may demolish that specific building and newly construct a building on that land or on land located in the housing complex that is managed or used together with that land (limited to land co-owned by the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex).

    第七十八条に規定する場合において、滅失した建物以外の特定の建物(以下この条及び次条において「特定建物」という。)が所在する土地(これに関する権利を含む。)が当該団地内建物の団地建物所有者等の共有に属し、かつ、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じてそれぞれ当該各号に定める要件に該当する場合に当該土地(これに関する権利を含む。)の共有者である当該団地内建物の団地建物所有者等で構成される団地建物所有者等集会において議決権の過半数(これを上回る割合を第七十九条において準用する第三十条第一項の規約で定めた場合にあつては、その割合以上)を有する団地建物所有者等が出席し、出席した団地建物所有者等の議決権の四分の三以上の多数による承認の決議(次項及び第三項において「建替え承認決議」という。)を得たときは、当該特定建物の団地建物所有者等は、当該特定建物を取り壊し、かつ、当該土地又はこれと一体として管理若しくは使用をする団地内の土地(当該団地内建物の団地建物所有者等の共有に属するものに限る。)に新たに建物を建築することができる。

  • AddedArticle 82, paragraph (1), item (i)

    if the specific building is a building with exclusively-owned areas:a resolution to reconstruct has been adopted for the specific building or the consent of all of the unit owners of that specific building has been obtained; or

    当該特定建物が専有部分のある建物である場合 その建替え決議又はその区分所有者の全員の同意があること。

  • AddedArticle 82, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    if the specific building is a building other than a building with exclusively-owned areas:the consent of the owners of that specific building has been obtained.

    当該特定建物が専有部分のある建物以外の建物である場合 その所有者の同意があること。

  • AddedArticle 82, paragraph (2)

    The provisions of paragraphs (2) through (7) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to a resolution to approve reconstruction. In such a case, the term "specific destroyed building" in those provisions (excluding paragraph (2) of that Article) is deemed to be replaced with "specific building"; the phrase "the preceding paragraph" in paragraph (2) of that Article and the phrase "paragraph (1)" in paragraphs (5) and (6) of that Article are deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) of the following Article"; the term "specific destroyed building" in paragraph (2) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "specific building (meaning the specific building prescribed in paragraph (1) of the following Article; the same applies hereinafter)", and the phrase "was located" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "is located"; the phrase "the items of paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the items of paragraph (1) of the following Article", and the phrase "co-owners of the grounds, etc. pertaining to" in the proviso to that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "unit owners of"; the phrase "meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. referred to in paragraph (1)" in paragraph (4) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. referred to in paragraph (1) of the following Article"; the phrase "the rebuilding under" in paragraph (5) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the reconstruction under"; the phrase "the rebuilding of the specific" in that paragraph and paragraph (7) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the reconstruction of the specific"; the phrase "the rebuilding of those two or more" in paragraphs (6) and (7) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the reconstruction of those two or more"; and, in paragraph (7) of that Article, the phrase "were buildings with exclusively-owned areas" is deemed to be replaced with "are buildings with exclusively-owned areas", the phrase "a meeting of co-owners of the grounds, etc." is deemed to be replaced with "a meeting referred to in Article 62, paragraph (1)", the phrase "a four-fifths majority of the voting rights of the co-owners of the grounds, etc." is deemed to be replaced with "a four-fifths majority (or, if the specific building falls under any of the items of paragraph (2) of that Article, a three-fourths majority) each of the unit owners (excluding those who do not hold voting rights) and of the voting rights", the phrase "limited to co-owners of the grounds, etc." is deemed to be replaced with "limited to unit owners", and the phrase "that paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "the preceding paragraph".

    前条第二項から第七項までの規定は、建替え承認決議について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定(同条第二項を除く。)中「特定滅失建物」とあるのは「特定建物」と、同条第二項中「前項」とあり、並びに同条第五項及び第六項中「第一項」とあるのは「次条第一項」と、同条第二項中「特定滅失建物」とあるのは「特定建物(次条第一項に規定する特定建物をいう。以下同じ。)」と、「所在していた」とあるのは「所在する」と、同条第三項中「第一項各号」とあるのは「次条第一項各号」と、同項ただし書中「に係る敷地共有者等」とあるのは「の区分所有者」と、同条第四項中「第一項の団地建物所有者等集会」とあるのは「次条第一項の団地建物所有者等集会」と、同条第五項中「再建が」とあるのは「建替えが」と、同項及び同条第七項中「再建を」とあるのは「建替えを」と、同条第六項及び第七項中「再建に」とあるのは「建替えに」と、同項中「専有部分のある建物であつた」とあるのは「専有部分のある建物である」と、「敷地共有者等集会」とあるのは「第六十二条第一項の集会」と、「敷地共有者等の議決権の五分の四」とあるのは「区分所有者(議決権を有しないものを除く。)及び議決権の各五分の四(当該特定建物が同条第二項各号のいずれかに該当する場合にあつては、四分の三)」と、「敷地共有者等に」とあるのは「区分所有者に」と、「同項」とあるのは「前項」と読み替えるものとする。

  • AddedArticle 82, paragraph (3)

    For the purpose of applying the provisions of paragraph (1) in the case where the specific building subject to the reconstruction under a resolution to approve reconstruction (or, in the case referred to in paragraph (6) of the preceding Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph, all of the specific buildings subject to the reconstruction under the resolution to approve reconstruction) falls under any of the items of Article 62, paragraph (2), the term "three-fourths" in paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "two-thirds".

    建替え承認決議に係る建替えの対象となる特定建物(前項において準用する前条第六項の場合にあつては、建替え承認決議に係る建替えの対象となる全ての特定建物)が第六十二条第二項各号のいずれかに該当する場合における第一項の規定の適用については、同項中「四分の三」とあるのは、「三分の二」とする。

Article 83 · Resolutions to Approve Reconstruction and Rebuilding If a Building Located in a Housing Complex Has Been Destroyed第八十三条(団地内の建物が滅失した場合における建替え再建承認決議)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 83, paragraph (1)

    In the case prescribed in Article 78, if the land on which a specific building is located (including rights related to that land) and the land on which a specific destroyed building was located (including rights related to that land) are both co-owned by the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex, and, where the requirements specified in the following items for the categories of cases set forth in those items are satisfied with regard to that specific building and that specific destroyed building (hereinafter referred to as "the specific building, etc." in this paragraph and the following paragraph), a resolution to the effect that the reconstruction of that specific building and the rebuilding of that specific destroyed building are approved collectively (hereinafter referred to as a "resolution to approve reconstruction and rebuilding" in this Article) has been obtained by at least a three-fourths majority of the voting rights of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. present at a meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. consisting of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex who are co-owners of that land (including rights related to it), at which owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. who hold a majority of the voting rights (or, if a higher proportion is specified in the bylaws referred to in Article 30, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79, at least that proportion) are present, the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the specific building, etc. may demolish that specific building and newly construct a building on that land or on land located in the housing complex that is managed or used together with that land (limited to land co-owned by the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex); provided, however, that this applies only if the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the specific building, etc. have each agreed to bring the reconstruction of that specific building and the rebuilding of that specific destroyed building to a resolution to approve reconstruction and rebuilding.

    第七十八条に規定する場合において、特定建物が所在する土地(これに関する権利を含む。)及び特定滅失建物が所在していた土地(これに関する権利を含む。)がいずれも当該団地内建物の団地建物所有者等の共有に属し、かつ、当該特定建物及び当該特定滅失建物(以下この項及び次項において「当該特定建物等」という。)につき次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じてそれぞれ当該各号に定める要件に該当する場合にこれらの土地(これらに関する権利を含む。)の共有者である当該団地内建物の団地建物所有者等で構成される団地建物所有者等集会において議決権の過半数(これを上回る割合を第七十九条において準用する第三十条第一項の規約で定めた場合にあつては、その割合以上)を有する団地建物所有者等が出席し、出席した団地建物所有者等の議決権の四分の三以上の多数により当該特定建物の建替え及び当該特定滅失建物の再建について一括して承認する旨の決議(以下この条において「建替え再建承認決議」という。)を得たときは、当該特定建物等の団地建物所有者等は、当該特定建物を取り壊し、かつ、これらの土地又はこれらと一体として管理若しくは使用をする団地内の土地(当該団地内建物の団地建物所有者等の共有に属するものに限る。)に新たに建物を建築することができる。ただし、当該特定建物等の団地建物所有者等がそれぞれ当該特定建物の建替え及び当該特定滅失建物の再建について建替え再建承認決議に付する旨の合意をした場合でなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 83, paragraph (1), item (i)

    if the specific building is a building with exclusively-owned areas:a resolution to reconstruct has been adopted for the specific building or the consent of all of the unit owners of that specific building has been obtained; or

    当該特定建物が専有部分のある建物である場合 その建替え決議又はその区分所有者の全員の同意があること。

  • AddedArticle 83, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    if the specific destroyed building was a building with exclusively-owned areas:a resolution to rebuild has been adopted for the specific destroyed building or the consent of all of the co-owners of the grounds, etc. of that specific destroyed building has been obtained;

    当該特定滅失建物が専有部分のある建物であつた場合 その再建決議又はその敷地共有者等の全員の同意があること。

  • AddedArticle 83, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    if the specific building is a building other than a building with exclusively-owned areas:the consent of the owners of that specific building has been obtained.

    当該特定建物が専有部分のある建物以外の建物である場合 その所有者の同意があること。

  • AddedArticle 83, paragraph (1), item (iv)

    if the specific destroyed building was a building other than a building with exclusively-owned areas:the consent of the persons who hold rights related to the grounds of the building that were held for owning that specific destroyed building has been obtained.

    当該特定滅失建物が専有部分のある建物以外の建物であつた場合 当該特定滅失建物の所有に係る建物の敷地に関する権利を有する者の同意があること。

  • AddedArticle 83, paragraph (2)

    In the case referred to in the main clause of the preceding paragraph, if the specific building, etc. are buildings with exclusively-owned areas (including a destroyed building with exclusively-owned areas), and the requirements specified in the following items for the categories of cases set forth in those items are satisfied, a resolution to bring the reconstruction of that specific building and the rebuilding of that specific destroyed building to a resolution to approve reconstruction and rebuilding may be adopted at the meeting prescribed in the relevant item. In such a case, if the resolution is adopted, the agreement prescribed in the proviso to the preceding paragraph is deemed to have been reached by the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the specific building, etc. (limited to unit owners for the specific building, and to co-owners of the grounds, etc. for the specific destroyed building).

    前項本文の場合において、当該特定建物等が専有部分のある建物(滅失した専有部分のある建物を含む。)であり、かつ、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じてそれぞれ当該各号に定める要件に該当するときは、当該各号に規定する集会において、当該特定建物の建替え及び当該特定滅失建物の再建について建替え再建承認決議に付する旨の決議をすることができる。この場合において、その決議があつたときは、当該特定建物等の団地建物所有者等(特定建物にあつては区分所有者に限り、特定滅失建物にあつては敷地共有者等に限る。)の前項ただし書に規定する合意があつたものとみなす。

  • AddedArticle 83, paragraph (2), item (i)

    for the specific building:at a meeting referred to in Article 62, paragraph (1) for which the reconstruction of that specific building is the subject matter, at least four-fifths (or, if that specific building falls under any of the items of paragraph (2) of that Article, at least three-fourths) of the unit owners of that specific building (excluding those who do not hold voting rights) and of the voting rights are in favor; and

    特定建物である場合 当該特定建物の建替えを会議の目的とする第六十二条第一項の集会において、当該特定建物の区分所有者(議決権を有しないものを除く。)及び議決権の各五分の四(当該特定建物が同条第二項各号のいずれかに該当する場合にあつては、四分の三)以上の賛成があること。

  • AddedArticle 83, paragraph (2), item (ii)

    for the specific destroyed building:at a meeting of co-owners of the grounds, etc. for which the rebuilding of that specific destroyed building is the subject matter, at least four-fifths of the voting rights of the co-owners of the grounds, etc. pertaining to that specific destroyed building are in favor.

    特定滅失建物である場合 当該特定滅失建物の再建を会議の目的とする敷地共有者等集会において、当該特定滅失建物に係る敷地共有者等の議決権の五分の四以上の賛成があること。

  • AddedArticle 83, paragraph (3)

    The provisions of paragraphs (2) through (5) of Article 81 apply mutatis mutandis to a resolution to approve reconstruction and rebuilding. In such a case, the phrase "the preceding paragraph" in paragraph (2) of that Article and the phrase "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (5) of that Article are deemed to be replaced with "Article 83, paragraph (1)"; the phrase "specific destroyed building" in paragraph (2) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "specific building (meaning the specific building prescribed in paragraph (1) of the following Article; the same applies in the following paragraph and paragraph (5)) is located (including rights related to that land) and that specific destroyed building"; the phrase "the items of paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 83, paragraph (1)", and the phrase "of the specific destroyed building" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "of the specific building, etc. (meaning the specific building, etc. prescribed in that paragraph; hereinafter the same applies in this paragraph and paragraph (5))"; the phrase "item (i) of that paragraph" in the proviso to that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "items (i) and (ii) of paragraph (1) of that Article", and the phrase "the co-owners of the grounds, etc. pertaining to the specific destroyed building" in that proviso is deemed to be replaced with "the unit owners of the specific building or the co-owners of the grounds, etc. pertaining to that specific destroyed building"; the phrase "other than the specific destroyed building" in that proviso and in paragraph (5) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "other than the specific building, etc."; the phrase "meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. referred to in paragraph (1)" in paragraph (4) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. referred to in Article 83, paragraph (1)"; and the phrase "the rebuilding under" in paragraph (5) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the reconstruction and rebuilding under", and the phrase "the rebuilding of the specific destroyed building" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "the reconstruction of the specific building and the rebuilding of that specific destroyed building".

    第八十一条第二項から第五項までの規定は、建替え再建承認決議について準用する。この場合において、同条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第五項中「第一項」とあるのは「第八十三条第一項」と、同条第二項中「特定滅失建物」とあるのは「特定建物(次条第一項に規定する特定建物をいう。次項及び第五項において同じ。)が所在する土地(これに関する権利を含む。)及び当該特定滅失建物」と、同条第三項中「第一項各号」とあるのは「第八十三条第一項各号」と、「当該特定滅失建物の」とあるのは「当該特定建物等(同項に規定する当該特定建物等をいう。以下この項及び第五項において同じ。)の」と、同項ただし書中「同項第一号」とあるのは「同条第一項第一号及び第二号」と、「特定滅失建物に」とあるのは「特定建物の区分所有者又は当該特定滅失建物に」と、同項ただし書及び同条第五項中「当該特定滅失建物以外」とあるのは「当該特定建物等以外」と、同条第四項中「第一項の団地建物所有者等集会」とあるのは「第八十三条第一項の団地建物所有者等集会」と、同条第五項中「再建が」とあるのは「建替え及び再建が」と、「特定滅失建物の」とあるのは「特定建物の建替え及び当該特定滅失建物の」と読み替えるものとする。

Article 84 · Resolutions to Reconstruct All Buildings, etc. If a Building Located in a Housing Complex Has Been Destroyed第八十四条(団地内の建物が滅失した場合における一括建替え等決議)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (1)

    In the case prescribed in the main clause of Article 70, paragraph (1), if all or some of the buildings located in the housing complex have been destroyed, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 62, paragraph (1) and Article 75, paragraph (1), a resolution to demolish all of the buildings in the housing complex collectively and newly construct buildings on the grounds of buildings in a housing complex, etc. (meaning the land on which the buildings in a housing complex are or were located and the land that has been established as the grounds of the buildings in a housing complex pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (1), or that had been so established at the time the buildings in the housing complex were destroyed; hereinafter the same applies in this paragraph and the following paragraph) or on part of that land, or on land that includes all or part of the grounds of buildings in a housing complex, etc. (such land is referred to as the "grounds of the reconstructed housing complex" in paragraph (3), item (i)) (hereinafter referred to as a "resolution to reconstruct all buildings, etc." in this Article) may be adopted at a meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. consisting of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex who are co-owners of the grounds of buildings in a housing complex, etc. or of rights related to them, by at least a four-fifths majority of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in the housing complex (excluding those who do not hold voting rights) and at least a four-fifths majority of the voting rights; provided, however, that this does not apply if, at that meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc., with regard to any one or more of the buildings in the housing complex, the persons specified in the following items for the categories of cases set forth in those items opposed the resolution to reconstruct all buildings, etc.

    第七十条第一項本文に規定する場合において、団地内の全部又は一部の建物が滅失したときは、第六十二条第一項及び第七十五条第一項の規定にかかわらず、団地内建物の敷地等(団地内建物が所在し、又は所在していた土地及び第五条第一項の規定により団地内建物の敷地とされ、又は団地内建物が滅失した当時において団地内建物の敷地とされていた土地をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)又はこれに関する権利の共有者である当該団地内建物の団地建物所有者等で構成される団地建物所有者等集会において、当該団地内建物の団地建物所有者等(議決権を有しないものを除く。)及び議決権の各五分の四以上の多数で、当該団地内建物につき一括して、その全部を取り壊し、かつ、当該団地内建物の敷地等若しくはその一部の土地又は当該団地内建物の敷地等の全部若しくは一部を含む土地(第三項第一号においてこれらの土地を「再建団地内敷地」という。)に新たに建物を建築する旨の決議(以下この条において「一括建替え等決議」という。)をすることができる。ただし、当該団地建物所有者等集会において、当該団地内建物のうちいずれか一以上の建物につき、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じてそれぞれ当該各号に定める者がその一括建替え等決議に反対したときは、この限りでない。

  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (1), item (i)

    if the building is a destroyed building: persons who hold more than one-third of the voting rights prescribed in Article 38 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73; or

    当該建物が滅失した建物である場合 第七十三条において準用する第三十八条に規定する議決権の三分の一を超える議決権を有する者

  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    in a case other than the case set forth in the preceding item: more than one-third of the unit owners (excluding those who do not hold voting rights) or persons who hold more than one-third of the total voting rights prescribed in Article 38.

    前号に掲げる場合以外の場合 区分所有者(議決権を有しないものを除く。)の三分の一を超える者又は第三十八条に規定する議決権の合計の三分の一を超える議決権を有する者

  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (2)

    Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 38 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79, the voting rights of each owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc. under the main clause of the preceding paragraph at the meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. referred to in that paragraph are to be in proportion to the value of the share in the grounds of buildings in a housing complex, etc. (including rights related to them), even if it is otherwise provided for in the bylaws referred to in Article 30, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79.

    前項の団地建物所有者等集会における同項本文の各団地建物所有者等の議決権は、第七十九条において準用する第三十八条の規定にかかわらず、第七十九条において準用する第三十条第一項の規約に別段の定めがある場合であつても、当該団地内建物の敷地等(これに関する権利を含む。)の持分の価格の割合によるものとする。

  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (3)

    A resolution to reconstruct all buildings, etc. must establish the following matters:

    一括建替え等決議においては、次の事項を定めなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (3), item (i)

    an outline of the plan for the integrated use of the grounds of the reconstructed housing complex;

    再建団地内敷地の一体的な利用についての計画の概要

  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (3), item (ii)

    an outline of the designs of the buildings that are to be newly constructed (hereinafter referred to as the "reconstructed buildings in the housing complex" in this paragraph);

    新たに建築する建物(以下この項において「再建団地内建物」という。)の設計の概要

  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (3), item (iii)

    the estimated amount of expenses necessary for the demolition of all of the buildings in the housing complex and for constructing the reconstructed buildings in the housing complex;

    団地内建物の全部の取壊し及び再建団地内建物の建築に要する費用の概算額

  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (3), item (iv)

    matters concerning the sharing of expenses prescribed in the preceding item; and

    前号に規定する費用の分担に関する事項

  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (3), item (v)

    matters concerning the attribution of unit ownership in the reconstructed buildings in the housing complex.

    再建団地内建物の区分所有権の帰属に関する事項

  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (4)

    The provisions of Article 62, paragraphs (5) through (10) and Articles 63 through 64-4 apply mutatis mutandis to a resolution to reconstruct all buildings, etc. In such a case, the term "unit owner" in those provisions (excluding Article 62, paragraph (5)) is deemed to be replaced with "owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc."; the phrase "item (iii) and item (iv) of the preceding paragraph" in Article 62, paragraph (5) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 84, paragraph (3), item (iv) and item (v)", and the term "unit owner" in that paragraph with "owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc. (meaning an owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc. as prescribed in Article 78; the same applies hereinafter)"; the phrase "a meeting" in paragraph (6) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "a meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. (meaning a meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. as prescribed in Article 80, paragraph (1); hereinafter the same applies in this Article and the following Article)"; the phrase "Article 35, paragraph (1)" in that paragraph and paragraph (7) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "Article 35, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79"; the phrase "the date of that meeting" in paragraph (6) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the date of that meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc."; the term "reconstruction" in paragraph (7), item (i) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "reconstruction or rebuilding"; the term "meeting" in paragraphs (8) and (10) of that Article and Article 63, paragraphs (1) and (2) is deemed to be replaced with "meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc."; the phrase "Articles 35 and 36" in Article 62, paragraph (9) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 35, paragraphs (1) through (3) and Article 36 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79, and Article 80"; the phrase "in the reconstruction" in Article 63, paragraphs (1), (2), (4), and (6) and Article 64 is deemed to be replaced with "in the reconstruction or rebuilding"; in Article 63, paragraph (5), the phrase "participate in the reconstruction" is deemed to be replaced with "participate in the reconstruction or rebuilding", the phrase "purchase the unit ownership or the rights to use the grounds" with "purchase the unit ownership or the rights to use the grounds (or, for a destroyed building, the co-ownership interest in the grounds, etc. (meaning the co-ownership interest in the grounds, etc. as prescribed in Article 72; hereinafter the same applies in this Article and the following Article))", the phrase "that paragraph" with "paragraph (3)", the phrase "not participate in the reconstruction" with "not participate in the reconstruction or rebuilding", and the phrase "the rights to use the grounds at their market value" with "the rights to use the grounds (or, for a destroyed building, the co-ownership interest in the grounds, etc.) at their market value"; the phrase "demolition work on the building" in paragraphs (7) and (8) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "demolition or rebuilding work on the building"; the phrase "rights to use the grounds" in paragraph (7) of that Article and Article 64 is deemed to be replaced with "rights to use the grounds (or, for a destroyed building, the co-ownership interest in the grounds, etc.)"; the phrase "implement the reconstruction" in Article 64 is deemed to be replaced with "implement the reconstruction or rebuilding"; and the phrase "participate in the reconstruction" in Article 64-2, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "participate in the reconstruction or rebuilding".

    第六十二条第五項から第十項まで及び第六十三条から第六十四条の四までの規定は、一括建替え等決議について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定(第六十二条第五項を除く。)中「区分所有者」とあるのは「団地建物所有者等」と、第六十二条第五項中「前項第三号及び第四号」とあるのは「第八十四条第三項第四号及び第五号」と、「区分所有者」とあるのは「団地建物所有者等(第七十八条に規定する団地建物所有者等をいう。以下同じ。)」と、同条第六項中「集会を」とあるのは「団地建物所有者等集会(第八十条第一項に規定する団地建物所有者等集会をいう。以下この条及び次条において同じ。)を」と、同項及び同条第七項中「第三十五条第一項」とあるのは「第七十九条において準用する第三十五条第一項」と、同条第六項中「集会の」とあるのは「団地建物所有者等集会の」と、同条第七項第一号中「建替え」とあるのは「建替え又は再建」と、同条第八項及び第十項並びに第六十三条第一項及び第二項中「集会」とあるのは「団地建物所有者等集会」と、第六十二条第九項中「第三十五条及び第三十六条」とあるのは「第七十九条において準用する第三十五条第一項から第三項まで及び第三十六条並びに第八十条」と、第六十三条第一項、第二項、第四項及び第六項並びに第六十四条中「建替えに」とあるのは「建替え又は再建に」と、第六十三条第五項中「建替えに参加する」とあるのは「建替え若しくは再建に参加する」と、「敷地利用権を買い受ける」とあるのは「敷地利用権(滅失した建物にあつては、敷地共有持分等(第七十二条に規定する敷地共有持分等をいう。以下この条及び次条において同じ。))を買い受ける」と、「同項」とあるのは「第三項」と、「建替えに参加しない」とあるのは「建替え又は再建に参加しない」と、「敷地利用権を時価」とあるのは「敷地利用権(滅失した建物にあつては、敷地共有持分等)を時価」と、同条第七項及び第八項中「建物の取壊しの工事」とあるのは「建物の取壊し又は再建の工事」と、同条第七項及び第六十四条中「敷地利用権」とあるのは「敷地利用権(滅失した建物にあつては、敷地共有持分等)」と、同条中「建替えを」とあるのは「建替え又は再建を」と、第六十四条の二第一項中「建替えに」とあるのは「建替え若しくは再建に」と読み替えるものとする。

Article 85 · Resolutions to Sell the Grounds of All Buildings If All of the Buildings Located in a Housing Complex Are Destroyed第八十五条(団地内の全部の建物が滅失した場合における一括敷地売却決議)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 85, paragraph (1)

    In the case prescribed in the main clause of Article 70, paragraph (1), if all of the buildings located in a housing complex have been destroyed, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 76, paragraph (1), a resolution to the effect that all of the grounds of buildings in a housing complex, etc. (meaning the land on which the buildings in a housing complex were located and the land that had been established as part of the grounds of the buildings in a housing complex pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (1) at the time the buildings in a housing complex were destroyed; hereinafter the same applies in this paragraph and the following paragraph) or the rights related to them are to be sold collectively (hereinafter referred to as a "resolution to sell the grounds of all buildings" in this Article) may be adopted by at least a four-fifths majority of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of the relevant buildings in a housing complex (excluding those who do not hold voting rights) and at least a four-fifths majority of the voting rights, at a meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. that consists of the owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. of those buildings in a housing complex who are co-owners of the grounds of buildings in a housing complex, etc. or the rights related to them; provided, however, that this does not apply if, at that meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc., for any one or more of those buildings in a housing complex, persons who hold more than one-third of the voting rights prescribed in Article 38 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73 have opposed the resolution to sell the grounds of all buildings.

    第七十条第一項本文に規定する場合において、団地内の全部の建物が滅失したときは、第七十六条第一項の規定にかかわらず、団地内建物の敷地等(団地内建物が所在していた土地及び団地内建物が滅失した当時において第五条第一項の規定により団地内建物の敷地とされていた土地をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)又はこれに関する権利の共有者である当該団地内建物の団地建物所有者等で構成される団地建物所有者等集会において、当該団地内建物の団地建物所有者等(議決権を有しないものを除く。)及び議決権の各五分の四以上の多数で、当該団地内建物の敷地等又はこれに関する権利につき一括して、その全部を売却する旨の決議(以下この条において「一括敷地売却決議」という。)をすることができる。ただし、当該団地建物所有者等集会において、当該団地内建物のうちいずれか一以上の建物につき、第七十三条において準用する第三十八条に規定する議決権の三分の一を超える議決権を有する者がその一括敷地売却決議に反対した場合は、この限りでない。

  • AddedArticle 85, paragraph (2)

    Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 38 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79, the voting rights of each owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc. under the main clause of the preceding paragraph at the meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. referred to in that paragraph are to be in proportion to the value of the share in the grounds of buildings in a housing complex, etc. (including rights related to them), even if it is otherwise provided for in the bylaws referred to in Article 30, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79.

    前項の団地建物所有者等集会における同項本文の各団地建物所有者等の議決権は、第七十九条において準用する第三十八条の規定にかかわらず、第七十九条において準用する第三十条第一項の規約に別段の定めがある場合であつても、当該団地内建物の敷地等(これに関する権利を含む。)の持分の価格の割合によるものとする。

  • AddedArticle 85, paragraph (3)

    A resolution to sell the grounds of all buildings must establish the following matters:

    一括敷地売却決議においては、次の事項を定めなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 85, paragraph (3), item (i)

    the name of the person who is to be the counterparty to the sale; and

    売却の相手方となるべき者の氏名又は名称

  • AddedArticle 85, paragraph (3), item (ii)

    the expected amount of the price from the sale.

    売却による代金の見込額

  • AddedArticle 85, paragraph (4)

    The provisions of Article 62, paragraph (6), paragraph (7) (limited to the part other than the items), and paragraphs (8) through (10), Article 63 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (5), and paragraph (6)), and Article 64 apply mutatis mutandis to a resolution to sell the grounds of all buildings. In such a case, the term "unit owner" in those provisions (excluding Article 62, paragraph (8)) is deemed to be replaced with "owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc."; the phrase "a meeting" in Article 62, paragraph (6) is deemed to be replaced with "a meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. (meaning a meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc. as prescribed in Article 80, paragraph (1); hereinafter the same applies in this Article and the following Article)"; the phrase "Article 35, paragraph (1)" in that paragraph and paragraph (7) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "Article 35, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79"; the phrase "the date of that meeting" in paragraph (6) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the date of that meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc."; the phrase "the following matters" in paragraph (7) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the reasons that necessitate the sale"; the term "meeting" in paragraphs (8) and (10) of that Article and Article 63, paragraphs (1) and (2) is deemed to be replaced with "meeting of owners of buildings in a housing complex, etc."; the term "unit owner" in Article 62, paragraph (8) is deemed to be replaced with "owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc. (meaning an owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc. as prescribed in Article 78; the same applies in the following Article and Article 64)"; the phrase "Articles 35 and 36" in paragraph (9) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "Article 35, paragraphs (1) through (3) and Article 36 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 79, and Article 80"; the phrase "in the reconstruction" in Article 63, paragraphs (1), (2), and (4), the first sentence of paragraph (5) of that Article, and Article 64 is deemed to be replaced with "in the sale"; in the first sentence of that paragraph, the phrase "purchase the unit ownership and the rights to use the grounds" is deemed to be replaced with "purchase the co-ownership interest in the grounds, etc. (meaning the co-ownership interest in the grounds, etc. as prescribed in Article 72; the same applies hereinafter)", and the phrase "the unit ownership and the rights to use the grounds at their market value" with "the co-ownership interest in the grounds, etc. at its market value"; the phrase "demolition work on the building has not commenced" in Article 63, paragraph (7) is deemed to be replaced with "there has been no transfer of rights to the land related to the co-ownership interest in the grounds, etc. (including rights related to that land) under a sales contract (hereinafter referred to as a 'transfer of rights to the land, etc.' in this paragraph and the following paragraph)"; the phrase "unit ownership or rights to use the grounds" in that paragraph and Article 64 is deemed to be replaced with "co-ownership interest in the grounds, etc."; the phrase "not commencing the demolition work on the building" in the proviso to that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "there having been no transfer of rights to the land, etc."; in Article 63, paragraph (8), the phrase "the commencement of the demolition work" is deemed to be replaced with "the transfer of rights to the land, etc.", and the phrase "demolition work on the building has not commenced" with "there is no transfer of rights to the land, etc."; and the phrase "implement the reconstruction" in Article 64 is deemed to be replaced with "implement the sale".

    第六十二条第六項、第七項(各号列記以外の部分に限る。)及び第八項から第十項まで、第六十三条(第五項後段及び第六項を除く。)並びに第六十四条の規定は、一括敷地売却決議について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定(第六十二条第八項を除く。)中「区分所有者」とあるのは「団地建物所有者等」と、第六十二条第六項中「集会を」とあるのは「団地建物所有者等集会(第八十条第一項に規定する団地建物所有者等集会をいう。以下この条及び次条において同じ。)を」と、同項及び同条第七項中「第三十五条第一項」とあるのは「第七十九条において準用する第三十五条第一項」と、同条第六項中「集会の」とあるのは「団地建物所有者等集会の」と、同条第七項中「次の事項」とあるのは「売却を必要とする理由」と、同条第八項及び第十項並びに第六十三条第一項及び第二項中「集会」とあるのは「団地建物所有者等集会」と、第六十二条第八項中「区分所有者」とあるのは「団地建物所有者等(第七十八条に規定する団地建物所有者等をいう。次条及び第六十四条において同じ。)」と、同条第九項中「第三十五条及び第三十六条」とあるのは「第七十九条において準用する第三十五条第一項から第三項まで及び第三十六条並びに第八十条」と、第六十三条第一項、第二項、第四項及び第五項前段並びに第六十四条中「建替えに」とあるのは「売却に」と、同項前段中「区分所有権及び敷地利用権を買い受ける」とあるのは「敷地共有持分等(第七十二条に規定する敷地共有持分等をいう。以下同じ。)を買い受ける」と、「区分所有権及び敷地利用権を時価」とあるのは「敷地共有持分等を時価」と、第六十三条第七項中「建物の取壊しの工事に着手しない」とあるのは「売買契約による敷地共有持分等に係る土地(これに関する権利を含む。)についての権利の移転(以下この項及び次項において「土地等の権利の移転」という。)がない」と、同項及び第六十四条中「区分所有権又は敷地利用権」とあるのは「敷地共有持分等」と、同項ただし書中「建物の取壊しの工事に着手しなかつた」とあるのは「土地等の権利の移転がなかつた」と、第六十三条第八項中「建物の取壊しの工事の着手」とあるのは「土地等の権利の移転」と、「その着手をしない」とあるのは「土地等の権利の移転がない」と、第六十四条中「建替えを」とあるのは「売却を」と読み替えるものとする。

Chapter 4第四章

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedChapter 4

    Chapter IV Judicial Proceedings for the Exclusion, etc. of Unknown or Missing Unit Owners, etc.

    第四章 所在等不明区分所有者等の除外等に関する裁判手続

Article 86 · Judicial Decisions on the Exclusion of Unknown or Missing Unit Owners, etc.第八十六条(所在等不明区分所有者等の除外に関する裁判)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (1)

    Cases concerning the judicial decisions set forth in the following items are subject to the jurisdiction of the district court with jurisdiction in the locality of the thing specified in the relevant item:

    次の各号に掲げる裁判に係る事件は、それぞれ当該各号に定める物の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄に属する。

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (1), item (i)

    a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 38-2, paragraph (1): the building to which the judicial decision relates;

    第三十八条の二第一項の規定による裁判 当該裁判に係る建物

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 38-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66 and Article 79: the land or attached facilities to which the judicial decision relates; and

    第六十六条及び第七十九条において準用する第三十八条の二第一項の規定による裁判 当該裁判に係る土地又は附属施設

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 38-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73: the grounds of the building or attached facilities to which the judicial decision relates.

    第七十三条において準用する第三十八条の二第一項の規定による裁判 当該裁判に係る建物の敷地又は附属施設

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (2)

    The court may not make the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph unless it has given public notice of the following matters and the period referred to in item (ii) has elapsed. In such a case, the period referred to in that item may not be less than one month.

    前項の裁判は、裁判所が次に掲げる事項を公告し、かつ、第二号の期間を経過した後でなければ、することができない。この場合において、同号の期間は、一月を下つてはならない。

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (2), item (i)

    that a petition for the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph has been filed with regard to the thing specified in the relevant item of that paragraph;

    前項各号に定める物について同項の裁判の申立てがあつたこと。

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (2), item (ii)

    that if there is any objection to the court making the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph, the following persons should file a notification to that effect within a certain period of time:

    裁判所が前項の裁判をすることについて異議があるときは、次に掲げる者は一定の期間内にその旨の届出をすべきこと。

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (2), item (ii), (a)

    an unknown or missing unit owner prescribed in Article 38-2, paragraph (1);

    第三十八条の二第一項に規定する所在等不明区分所有者

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (2), item (ii), (b)

    an unknown or missing owner of buildings in a housing complex or an unknown or missing owner of buildings in a housing complex, etc. prescribed in Article 38-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66 or Article 79 following the deemed replacement of terms; and

    第六十六条又は第七十九条において読み替えて準用する第三十八条の二第一項に規定する所在等不明団地建物所有者又は所在等不明団地建物所有者等

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (2), item (ii), (c)

    an unknown or missing co-owner of the grounds, etc. prescribed in Article 38-2, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73 following the deemed replacement of terms;

    第七十三条において読み替えて準用する第三十八条の二第一項に規定する所在等不明敷地共有者等

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (2), item (iii)

    that if there is no notification referred to in the preceding item, the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph will be made.

    前号の届出がないときは、前項の裁判がされること。

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (3)

    The judicial decision referred to in paragraph (1) does not become effective unless it becomes final and binding.

    第一項の裁判は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (4)

    The judicial decision referred to in paragraph (1) need not be notified to the persons set forth in paragraph (2), item (ii), (a) through (c).

    第一項の裁判は、第二項第二号イからハまでに掲げる者に告知することを要しない。

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (5)

    If the owner of the thing specified in the relevant item of paragraph (1) (including a person who holds a share of co-ownership in it) and their whereabouts have become known, the court must revoke the judicial decision referred to in that paragraph upon petition by an interested person.

    裁判所は、第一項各号に定める物の所有者(その共有持分を有する者を含む。)及びその所在が判明したときは、利害関係人の申立てにより、同項の裁判を取り消さなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 86, paragraph (6)

    Only an interested person may file an immediate appeal against the judicial decision referred to in paragraph (1) and against a judicial decision on revocation under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

    第一項の裁判及び前項の規定による取消しの裁判に対しては、利害関係人に限り、即時抗告をすることができる。

Article 87 · Order for Management of an Exclusively-Owned Area with an Unknown Owner第八十七条(所有者不明専有部分管理命令)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (1)

    Non-contentious cases under the provisions of Chapter I, Section 6 are subject to the jurisdiction of the district court with jurisdiction in the locality of the exclusively-owned area to which the matter for which a judicial decision is sought relates.

    第一章第六節の規定による非訟事件は、裁判を求める事項に係る専有部分の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄に属する。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (2)

    The court may not issue an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner unless it has given public notice of the following matters and the period referred to in item (ii) has elapsed. In such a case, the period referred to in that item may not be less than one month.

    裁判所は、次に掲げる事項を公告し、かつ、第二号の期間を経過した後でなければ、所有者不明専有部分管理命令をすることができない。この場合において、同号の期間は、一月を下つてはならない。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (2), item (i)

    that a petition for an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner has been filed with regard to the exclusively-owned area or share of co-ownership that is to be subject to it;

    所有者不明専有部分管理命令の申立てがその対象となるべき専有部分又は共有持分についてあつたこと。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (2), item (ii)

    that if there is any objection to the issuance of an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner, the person who holds the exclusively-owned area or share of co-ownership that is to be subject to the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner should file a notification to that effect within a certain period of time; and

    所有者不明専有部分管理命令をすることについて異議があるときは、所有者不明専有部分管理命令の対象となるべき専有部分又は共有持分を有する者は一定の期間内にその旨の届出をすべきこと。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (2), item (iii)

    that if there is no notification referred to in the preceding item, an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner will be issued.

    前号の届出がないときは、所有者不明専有部分管理命令がされること。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (3)

    In filing a petition for permission referred to in Article 46-3, paragraph (2) or Article 46-6, paragraph (2), the petitioner must make a prima facie showing of the reasons for seeking the permission.

    第四十六条の三第二項又は第四十六条の六第二項の許可の申立てをする場合には、その許可を求める理由を疎明しなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (4)

    When making a judicial decision on dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-6, paragraph (1) or a judicial decision fixing the amount of expenses or remuneration under the provisions of Article 46-7, paragraph (1), the court must hear the statement of the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner.

    裁判所は、第四十六条の六第一項の規定による解任の裁判又は第四十六条の七第一項の規定による費用若しくは報酬の額を定める裁判をする場合には、所有者不明専有部分管理人の陳述を聴かなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (5)

    Reasons must be given for the following judicial decisions:

    次に掲げる裁判には、理由を付さなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (5), item (i)

    a judicial decision dismissing a petition for an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner;

    所有者不明専有部分管理命令の申立てを却下する裁判

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (5), item (ii)

    a judicial decision dismissing a petition for permission referred to in Article 46-3, paragraph (2) or Article 46-6, paragraph (2); and

    第四十六条の三第二項又は第四十六条の六第二項の許可の申立てを却下する裁判

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (5), item (iii)

    a judicial decision on a petition for dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-6, paragraph (1).

    第四十六条の六第一項の規定による解任の申立てについての裁判

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (6)

    If an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner has been issued, a court clerk must, on their own authority and without delay, commission the registration of the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner with regard to the exclusively-owned area or share of co-ownership that has been made subject to the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner.

    所有者不明専有部分管理命令があつた場合には、裁判所書記官は、職権で、遅滞なく、所有者不明専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分又は共有持分について、所有者不明専有部分管理命令の登記を嘱託しなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (7)

    If a judicial decision revoking an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner has been made, a court clerk must, on their own authority and without delay, commission the cancellation of the registration of the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner.

    所有者不明専有部分管理命令を取り消す裁判があつたときは、裁判所書記官は、職権で、遅滞なく、所有者不明専有部分管理命令の登記の抹消を嘱託しなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (8)

    If money has arisen from the management or disposition of, or any other cause related to, the exclusively-owned area or share of co-ownership that has been made subject to an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner, as well as the movables, the rights related to the common areas and attached facilities, and the right to use the grounds to which the effect of the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner extends, the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner may deposit that money with a deposit office in the locality of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner (or, if the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner was issued with respect to a share of co-ownership, the exclusively-owned area that is the property in co-ownership), for the unit owner of that exclusively-owned area or the person who holds that share of co-ownership. In such a case, having made the deposit, the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner must give public notice to that effect and of other matters specified by Ministry of Justice Order, pursuant to the provisions of Ministry of Justice Order.

    所有者不明専有部分管理人は、所有者不明専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分又は共有持分並びに所有者不明専有部分管理命令の効力が及ぶ動産並びに共用部分及び附属施設に関する権利並びに敷地利用権の管理、処分その他の事由により金銭が生じたときは、その専有部分の区分所有者又はその共有持分を有する者のために、当該金銭を所有者不明専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分(共有持分を対象として所有者不明専有部分管理命令が発せられた場合にあつては、共有物である専有部分)の所在地の供託所に供託することができる。この場合において、供託をしたときは、法務省令で定めるところにより、その旨その他法務省令で定める事項を公告しなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (9)

    The court may change or revoke an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner.

    裁判所は、所有者不明専有部分管理命令を変更し、又は取り消すことができる。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (10)

    If there ceases to be any property to be managed (including if all of the property to be managed has been deposited) or if it otherwise ceases to be appropriate to continue the management of the property, the court must revoke the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner upon petition by the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner or petition by an interested person, or by its own authority.

    裁判所は、管理すべき財産がなくなつたとき(管理すべき財産の全部が供託されたときを含む。)その他財産の管理を継続することが相当でなくなつたときは、所有者不明専有部分管理人若しくは利害関係人の申立てにより又は職権で、所有者不明専有部分管理命令を取り消さなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (11)

    If the owner of the exclusively-owned area, etc. with an unknown owner (including a person who holds a share of co-ownership in it; hereinafter the same applies in this Article) has proved that the ownership of the exclusively-owned area, etc. with an unknown owner (including a share of co-ownership in it) belongs to them, the court must revoke the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner upon petition by that owner. In such a case, if the order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner has been revoked, the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner must report to that owner on the progress and results of the administrator's affairs and must deliver to that owner the property that has been proved to belong to that owner.

    所有者不明専有部分等の所有者(その共有持分を有する者を含む。以下この条において同じ。)が所有者不明専有部分等の所有権(その共有持分を含む。)が自己に帰属することを証明したときは、裁判所は、当該所有者の申立てにより、所有者不明専有部分管理命令を取り消さなければならない。この場合において、所有者不明専有部分管理命令が取り消されたときは、所有者不明専有部分管理人は、当該所有者に対し、その事務の経過及び結果を報告し、当該所有者に帰属することが証明された財産を引き渡さなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (12)

    An order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner and a judicial decision changing it need not be notified to the owner of the exclusively-owned area, etc. with an unknown owner.

    所有者不明専有部分管理命令及びその変更の裁判は、所有者不明専有部分等の所有者に告知することを要しない。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (13)

    It is sufficient to notify the owner of the exclusively-owned area, etc. with an unknown owner of a judicial decision revoking an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner only if that owner and their whereabouts are known from the records of the case.

    所有者不明専有部分管理命令の取消しの裁判は、事件の記録上所有者不明専有部分等の所有者及びその所在が判明している場合に限り、その所有者に告知すれば足りる。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (14)

    Only the persons specified in the following items may file an immediate appeal against the judicial decisions set forth in the respective items:

    次の各号に掲げる裁判に対しては、それぞれ当該各号に定める者に限り、即時抗告をすることができる。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (14), item (i)

    an order for management of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner: an interested person;

    所有者不明専有部分管理命令 利害関係人

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (14), item (ii)

    a judicial decision on dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-6, paragraph (1): an interested person;

    第四十六条の六第一項の規定による解任の裁判 利害関係人

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (14), item (iii)

    a judicial decision fixing the amount of expenses or remuneration under the provisions of Article 46-7, paragraph (1): the administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner; and

    第四十六条の七第一項の規定による費用又は報酬の額を定める裁判 所有者不明専有部分管理人

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (14), item (iv)

    a judicial decision on change or revocation under the provisions of paragraphs (9) through (11): an interested person.

    第九項から第十一項までの規定による変更又は取消しの裁判 利害関係人

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (15)

    No appeal may be entered against the following judicial decisions:

    次に掲げる裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (15), item (i)

    a judicial decision on the appointment of an administrator of an exclusively-owned area with an unknown owner under the provisions of Article 46-2, paragraph (4); and

    第四十六条の二第四項の規定による所有者不明専有部分管理人の選任の裁判

  • AddedArticle 87, paragraph (15), item (ii)

    a judicial decision granting permission referred to in Article 46-3, paragraph (2) or Article 46-6, paragraph (2).

    第四十六条の三第二項又は第四十六条の六第二項の許可の裁判

Article 88 · Order for Management of a Poorly Managed Exclusively-Owned Area and Order for Management of a Poorly Managed Common Area第八十八条(管理不全専有部分管理命令及び管理不全共用部分管理命令)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (1)

    Non-contentious cases under the provisions of Chapter I, Section 7 are subject to the jurisdiction of the district court with jurisdiction in the locality of the exclusively-owned area or common area to which the matter for which a judicial decision is sought relates.

    第一章第七節の規定による非訟事件は、裁判を求める事項に係る専有部分又は共用部分の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所の管轄に属する。

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (2)

    In filing a petition for permission referred to in Article 46-9, paragraph (3) or Article 46-11, paragraph (2), the petitioner must make a prima facie showing of the reasons for seeking the permission.

    第四十六条の九第三項又は第四十六条の十一第二項の許可の申立てをする場合には、その許可を求める理由を疎明しなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (3)

    When making the judicial decisions set forth in the following items, the court must hear the statements of the persons specified in the respective items; provided, however, that this does not apply if, in making the judicial decision set forth in item (i), there are circumstances in which going through the procedure for hearing the statement would prevent the purpose of the petition for that judicial decision from being achieved:

    裁判所は、次の各号に掲げる裁判をする場合には、それぞれ当該各号に定める者の陳述を聴かなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる裁判をする場合において、その陳述を聴く手続を経ることにより当該裁判の申立ての目的を達することができない事情があるときは、この限りでない。

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (3), item (i)

    an order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area: the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area that is to be subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

    管理不全専有部分管理命令 管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象となるべき専有部分の区分所有者

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (3), item (ii)

    a judicial decision granting permission referred to in Article 46-9, paragraph (3): the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

    第四十六条の九第三項の許可の裁判 管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分の区分所有者

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (3), item (iii)

    a judicial decision on dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-11, paragraph (1): the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

    第四十六条の十一第一項の規定による解任の裁判 管理不全専有部分管理人

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (3), item (iv)

    a judicial decision fixing the amount of expenses under the provisions of Article 46-12, paragraph (1): the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area; and

    第四十六条の十二第一項の規定による費用の額を定める裁判 管理不全専有部分管理人

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (3), item (v)

    a judicial decision fixing the amount of remuneration under the provisions of Article 46-12, paragraph (1): the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area and the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area.

    第四十六条の十二第一項の規定による報酬の額を定める裁判 管理不全専有部分管理人及び管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分の区分所有者

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (4)

    Reasons must be given for the following judicial decisions:

    次に掲げる裁判には、理由を付さなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (4), item (i)

    a judicial decision on a petition for an order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

    管理不全専有部分管理命令の申立てについての裁判

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (4), item (ii)

    a judicial decision on a petition for permission referred to in Article 46-9, paragraph (3);

    第四十六条の九第三項の許可の申立てについての裁判

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (4), item (iii)

    a judicial decision on a petition for dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-11, paragraph (1); and

    第四十六条の十一第一項の規定による解任の申立てについての裁判

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (4), item (iv)

    a judicial decision dismissing a petition for permission referred to in Article 46-11, paragraph (2).

    第四十六条の十一第二項の許可の申立てを却下する裁判

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (5)

    If money has arisen from the management or disposition of, or any other cause related to, the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to an order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area, as well as the movables, the rights related to the common areas and attached facilities, and the right to use the grounds to which the effect of the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area extends, the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area may deposit that money with a deposit office in the locality of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area, for the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area (including a person who holds a share of co-ownership in it). In such a case, having made the deposit, the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area must give public notice to that effect and of other matters specified by Ministry of Justice Order, pursuant to the provisions of Ministry of Justice Order.

    管理不全専有部分管理人は、管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分並びに管理不全専有部分管理命令の効力が及ぶ動産並びに共用部分及び附属施設に関する権利並びに敷地利用権の管理、処分その他の事由により金銭が生じたときは、その専有部分の区分所有者(その共有持分を有する者を含む。)のために、当該金銭を管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分の所在地の供託所に供託することができる。この場合において、供託をしたときは、法務省令で定めるところにより、その旨その他法務省令で定める事項を公告しなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (6)

    The court may change or revoke an order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area.

    裁判所は、管理不全専有部分管理命令を変更し、又は取り消すことができる。

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (7)

    If there ceases to be any property to be managed (including if all of the property to be managed has been deposited) or if it otherwise ceases to be appropriate to continue the management of the property, the court must revoke the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area upon petition by the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area or petition by an interested person, or by its own authority.

    裁判所は、管理すべき財産がなくなつたとき(管理すべき財産の全部が供託されたときを含む。)その他財産の管理を継続することが相当でなくなつたときは、管理不全専有部分管理人若しくは利害関係人の申立てにより又は職権で、管理不全専有部分管理命令を取り消さなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (8)

    Only the persons specified in the following items may file an immediate appeal against the judicial decisions set forth in the respective items:

    次の各号に掲げる裁判に対しては、それぞれ当該各号に定める者に限り、即時抗告をすることができる。

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (8), item (i)

    an order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area: an interested person;

    管理不全専有部分管理命令 利害関係人

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (8), item (ii)

    a judicial decision granting permission referred to in Article 46-9, paragraph (3): the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

    第四十六条の九第三項の許可の裁判 管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分の区分所有者

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (8), item (iii)

    a judicial decision on dismissal under the provisions of Article 46-11, paragraph (1): an interested person;

    第四十六条の十一第一項の規定による解任の裁判 利害関係人

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (8), item (iv)

    a judicial decision fixing the amount of expenses under the provisions of Article 46-12, paragraph (1): the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area;

    第四十六条の十二第一項の規定による費用の額を定める裁判 管理不全専有部分管理人

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (8), item (v)

    a judicial decision fixing the amount of remuneration under the provisions of Article 46-12, paragraph (1): the administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area and the unit owner of the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to the order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area; and

    第四十六条の十二第一項の規定による報酬の額を定める裁判 管理不全専有部分管理人及び管理不全専有部分管理命令の対象とされた専有部分の区分所有者

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (8), item (vi)

    a judicial decision on change or revocation under the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs: an interested person.

    前二項の規定による変更又は取消しの裁判 利害関係人

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (9)

    No appeal may be entered against the following judicial decisions:

    次に掲げる裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (9), item (i)

    a judicial decision on the appointment of an administrator of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area under the provisions of Article 46-8, paragraph (3); and

    第四十六条の八第三項の規定による管理不全専有部分管理人の選任の裁判

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (9), item (ii)

    a judicial decision granting permission referred to in Article 46-11, paragraph (2).

    第四十六条の十一第二項の許可の裁判

  • AddedArticle 88, paragraph (10)

    The provisions of paragraph (2) through the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to an order for management of a poorly managed common area and an administrator of a poorly managed common area. In such a case, the phrase "Article 46-9, paragraph (3)" in paragraph (2), paragraph (3), item (ii), paragraph (4), item (ii), and paragraph (8), item (ii) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 46-9, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 46-14"; in paragraph (3), items (i), (ii), and (v), paragraph (5), and paragraph (8), items (ii) and (v), the phrase "of the exclusively-owned area" is deemed to be replaced with "of the common area", and the term "unit owner" with "owner"; the phrase "Article 46-11, paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3), item (iii), paragraph (4), item (iii), and paragraph (8), item (iii) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 46-11, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 46-14"; the phrase "Article 46-12, paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3), items (iv) and (v) and paragraph (8), items (iv) and (v) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 46-12, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 46-14"; the phrase "Article 46-11, paragraph (2)" in paragraph (4), item (iv) and item (ii) of the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 46-11, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 46-14"; in paragraph (5), the phrase "the exclusively-owned area that has been made subject to an order for management of a poorly managed exclusively-owned area, as well as" is deemed to be replaced with "the common area that has been made subject to an order for management of a poorly managed common area and", and the phrase "the movables, the rights related to the common areas and attached facilities, and the right to use the grounds" with "the movables"; and the phrase "Article 46-8, paragraph (3)" in item (i) of the preceding paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "Article 46-13, paragraph (3)".

    第二項から前項までの規定は、管理不全共用部分管理命令及び管理不全共用部分管理人について準用する。この場合において、第二項、第三項第二号、第四項第二号及び第八項第二号中「第四十六条の九第三項」とあるのは「第四十六条の十四において準用する第四十六条の九第三項」と、第三項第一号、第二号及び第五号、第五項並びに第八項第二号及び第五号中「専有部分の」とあるのは「共用部分の」と、「区分所有者」とあるのは「所有者」と、第三項第三号、第四項第三号及び第八項第三号中「第四十六条の十一第一項」とあるのは「第四十六条の十四において準用する第四十六条の十一第一項」と、第三項第四号及び第五号並びに第八項第四号及び第五号中「第四十六条の十二第一項」とあるのは「第四十六条の十四において準用する第四十六条の十二第一項」と、第四項第四号及び前項第二号中「第四十六条の十一第二項」とあるのは「第四十六条の十四において準用する第四十六条の十一第二項」と、第五項中「専有部分並びに」とあるのは「共用部分及び」と、「動産並びに共用部分及び附属施設に関する権利並びに敷地利用権」とあるのは「動産」と、前項第一号中「第四十六条の八第三項」とあるのは「第四十六条の十三第三項」と読み替えるものとする。

Article 89 · Exclusion from Application of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act第八十九条(非訟事件手続法の適用除外)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 89, paragraph (1)

    The provisions of Article 40 of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act (Act No. 51 of 2011) do not apply to cases concerning a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 38-2, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66, Article 73, and Article 79).

    第三十八条の二第一項(第六十六条、第七十三条及び第七十九条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による裁判に係る事件については、非訟事件手続法(平成二十三年法律第五十一号)第四十条の規定は、適用しない。

  • AddedArticle 89, paragraph (2)

    The provisions of Article 40 and Article 57, paragraph (2), item (ii) of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act do not apply to non-contentious cases under the provisions of Chapter I, Sections 6 and 7.

    第一章第六節及び第七節の規定による非訟事件については、非訟事件手続法第四十条及び第五十七条第二項第二号の規定は、適用しない。

Article 90 · Supreme Court Rules第九十条(最高裁判所規則)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 90, paragraph (1)

    Beyond what is provided for in this Chapter, the necessary matters concerning judicial proceedings for cases concerning a judicial decision under the provisions of Article 38-2, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66, Article 73, and Article 79) and for non-contentious cases under the provisions of Chapter I, Sections 6 and 7 are specified by Supreme Court Rules.

    この章に定めるもののほか、第三十八条の二第一項(第六十六条、第七十三条及び第七十九条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による裁判に係る事件並びに第一章第六節及び第七節の規定による非訟事件に関する裁判手続に関し必要な事項は、最高裁判所規則で定める。

Article 91第九十一条

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 91, paragraph (1), item (i)

    if the person has failed to retain the bylaws, minutes, or documents, or electronic or magnetic records referred to in Article 45, paragraph (4) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66, Article 73, and Article 79), in violation of the provisions of the main clause of Article 33, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 42, paragraph (5) and Article 45, paragraph (4) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66 to those provisions), Article 73, and Article 79), and Article 66; hereinafter the same applies in this item, Article 73, and Article 79) or the main clause of Article 33, paragraph (1) (including as applied following the deemed replacement of terms mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 42, paragraph (5) and Article 45, paragraph (4) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66) and Article 66) as applied pursuant to Article 47, paragraph (12) following the deemed replacement of terms (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66);

    第三十三条第一項本文(第四十二条第五項及び第四十五条第四項(これらの規定を第六十六条、第七十三条及び第七十九条において準用する場合を含む。)、第六十六条、第七十三条並びに第六十六七十九条において準用する場合を含む。以下この号において同じ。)又は第四十七条第十二項(第六十六条において準用する場合を含む。)において読み替えて適用される第三十三条第一項本文(第四十二条第五項及び第四十五条第四項(これらの規定にを第六十六条において準用する場合を含む。)並びに第六十六条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定に違反して、規約、議事録又は第四十五条第四項(第六十六条、第七十三条及び第七十九条において準用する場合を含む。)の書面若しくは電磁的記録の保管をしなかつたとき。

  • ChangedArticle 91, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    if the person has refused, without legitimate grounds, to allow theoffer for inspection of the documents prescribed in the preceding item or of the content of the data recorded in the electronic or magnetic records prescribed in that the preceding item, displayed inthrough a means that is specified by Ministry of Justice Order without legitimate grounds, in violation of the provisions of Article 33, paragraph (2) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 42, paragraph (5) and Article 45, paragraph (4) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66 to those provisions), Article 73, and Article 79), and Article 66, Article 73, and Article 79);

    第三十三条第二項(第四十二条第五項及び第四十五条第四項(これらの規定を第六十六条、第七十三条及び第七十九条において準用する場合を含む。)、第六十六条、第七十三条並びに第六十六七十九条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定に違反して、正当な理由がないのに、前号に規定する書類又は電磁的記録に記録された情報の内容を法務省令で定める方法により表示したものの閲覧を拒んだとき。

  • ChangedArticle 91, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    if the person has failed to prepare minutes, has failedor to enter or record in the minutes the matters required to be entered or recorded in the minutes, or has made a false entrystatement or record, in violation of the provisions of Article 42, paragraphs (1) through (4) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66, Article 73, and Article 79);

    第四十二条第一項から第四項まで(これらの規定を第六十六条、第七十三条及び第七十九条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定に違反して、議事録を作成せず、又は議事録に記載し、若しくは記録すべき事項を記載せず、若しくは記録せず、若しくは虚偽の記載若しくは記録をしたとき。

Article 92第九十二条

Read it in the amended law

Its words stay the same; only its number changes.

    6 changes in the supplementary provisions (附則)

    Supplementary Provisions, Article 2 · Transitional Measures Accompanying the Partial Amendment of the Act on Building Unit Ownership附則第二条(建物の区分所有等に関する法律の一部改正に伴う経過措置)

    Read it in the amended law
    • AddedSupplementary Provisions, Article 2, paragraph (1)

      The provisions of the Act on Building Unit Ownership as amended by Article 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Building Unit Ownership Act" in this Article and Article 5, paragraph (7) of the Supplementary Provisions) also apply to matters that arose before this Act comes into effect, except as otherwise provided for in these Supplementary Provisions; provided, however, that this does not prejudice any effect that has arisen under the provisions of the Act on Building Unit Ownership prior to the amendment by Article 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Building Unit Ownership Act" in this Article).

      第一条の規定による改正後の建物の区分所有等に関する法律(以下この条及び附則第五条第七項において「新区分所有法」という。)の規定は、この附則に特別の定めがある場合を除き、この法律の施行前に生じた事項にも適用する。ただし、第一条の規定による改正前の建物の区分所有等に関する法律(以下この条において「旧区分所有法」という。)の規定により生じた効力を妨げない。

    • AddedSupplementary Provisions, Article 2, paragraph (2)

      The provisions then in force continue to govern a meeting for which the convocation procedures commenced under the provisions of the Former Building Unit Ownership Act before the date on which this Act comes into effect (hereinafter referred to as "the Effective Date").

      この法律の施行の日(以下「施行日」という。)前に旧区分所有法の規定により招集の手続が開始された集会については、なお従前の例による。

    • AddedSupplementary Provisions, Article 2, paragraph (3)

      Any matter provided for in bylaws under the provisions of the Former Building Unit Ownership Act that are in effect at the time this Act comes into effect, and that conflicts with the New Building Unit Ownership Act, ceases to be effective on the Effective Date.

      この法律の施行の際現に効力を有する旧区分所有法の規定による規約で定められた事項で新区分所有法に抵触するものは、施行日からその効力を失う。

    • AddedSupplementary Provisions, Article 2, paragraph (4)

      The provisions of Chapter III of the New Building Unit Ownership Act do not apply to a building destroyed before the Effective Date; provided, however, that this does not apply to a building destroyed by a disaster specified by the Cabinet Order referred to in Article 2 of the Act on Special Measures Concerning the Reconstruction, etc. of Buildings under Unit Ownership Damaged by Disasters as amended by Article 2, in the case where that Cabinet Order has come into effect on or after the Effective Date.

      施行日前に滅失した建物については、新区分所有法第三章の規定は、適用しない。ただし、施行日以後に第二条の規定による改正後の被災区分所有建物の再建等に関する特別措置法第二条の政令が施行された場合におけるその政令で定める災害により滅失した建物については、この限りでない。

    Supplementary Provisions, Article 7 · Transitional Measures Concerning Penal Provisions附則第七条(罰則に関する経過措置)

    Read it in the amended law
    • AddedSupplementary Provisions, Article 7, paragraph (1)

      The provisions then in force continue to govern the application of penal provisions to acts committed before the Effective Date.

      施行日前にした行為に対する罰則の適用については、なお従前の例による。

    Supplementary Provisions, Article 8 · Review附則第八条(検討)

    Read it in the amended law
    • AddedSupplementary Provisions, Article 8, paragraph (1)

      Around five years after this Act comes into effect, the Government is to consider the development of a system capable of appropriately responding to consultations from managers, unit owners (meaning unit owners as prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Act on Building Unit Ownership as amended by this Act; hereinafter the same applies in this paragraph), or persons who were unit owners, and other measures for the prevention and resolution of disputes concerning the repair, etc. of the common areas of condominiums, etc. to which the provisions of that Act apply, taking into consideration the state of the establishment or amendment of bylaws concerning manifestations of intention to the contrary, etc. referred to in Article 26, paragraph (2) of that Act, the state of claims for and the receipt of insurance money, etc. prescribed in that paragraph, and other circumstances, and if it finds it necessary, is to take the required measures based on the results.

      政府は、この法律の施行後五年を目途として、この法律による改正後の建物の区分所有等に関する法律第二十六条第二項の別段の意思表示等に係る規約の設定又は変更の状況並びに同項に規定する保険金等の請求及び受領の状況等を勘案し、管理者又は区分所有者(同法第二条第二項に規定する区分所有者をいう。以下この項において同じ。)若しくは区分所有者であった者からの相談に的確に応じることができる体制の整備その他同法の規定の適用を受けるマンション等の共用部分の補修等に係る紛争の予防及び解決のための方策について検討を加え、必要があると認めるときは、その結果に基づいて所要の措置を講ずるものとする。