# 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 / Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade — 第九章 (Chapter 9)

This is the Markdown twin of https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/ch-9. Every law, and how to address a provision: https://japanlaw.org/llms.txt. The same laws as MCP tools (no sign-in): https://japanlaw.org/mcp.

- Law: 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 (Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade), 昭和二十二年法律第五十四号
- English title "Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade": Ministry of Justice translation
- Kind: Act — the distinction between 法律 (Act), 政令 (Cabinet Order), 省令 (Ministerial Order) and 条例 (local ordinance) decides who may issue it and what it may say.
- Provision: 第九章 (Chapter 9) — address `ch-9`
- Text in force since: 2026-05-21
- URL (the page that opens at this provision): https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/ch-9
- e-Gov law ID: 322AC0000000054 — never renamed. A permanent link, `/l/{lawId}/{address}` on this site, redirects to the page.
- Every provision below carries its address and its URL on the line under it.
- Japanese text: e-Gov 法令検索, Digital Agency (デジタル庁). English: as marked on each line below.

Only the Japanese as published by the government has legal effect; the text
below is a copy of it. Every English rendering below is a translation and
says which kind: the Ministry of Justice's translation, or this
site's machine translation, whose model and date the Sources list names.
They are never merged and never substituted for one another.

---

## 第九章　訴訟 — Chapter IX Legal Actions
<sup>heading: Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>
<sup>ch-9 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/ch-9</sup>

### 第七十七条
<sup>art-77 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-77</sup>

**第一項**  排除措置命令等に係る行政事件訴訟法（昭和三十七年法律第百三十九号）第三条第一項に規定する抗告訴訟については、公正取引委員会を被告とする。
<sup>art-77/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-77/par-1</sup>
The Japan Fair Trade Commission is the defendant in the action for the judicial review of an administrative disposition provided for in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Administrative Case Litigation Act (Act No. 139 of 1962) in connection with a cease and desist order, etc.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第七十八条
<sup>art-78 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-78</sup>

**第一項**  第二十四条の規定による侵害の停止又は予防に関する訴えが提起されたときは、裁判所は、被告の申立てにより、決定で、相当の担保を立てるべきことを原告に命ずることができる。
<sup>art-78/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-78/par-1</sup>
If an action to suspend or prevent an infringement pursuant to the provisions of Article 24 has been filed, the court may issue a ruling ordering the plaintiff to provide adequate security, at the petition of the defendant.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation with a slip corrected by this site — not the Ministry's text; the Ministry printed: "If an action to suspend or prevent an infringement pursuant to the provisions of Article 24 has been filed, the court must issue a ruling ordering the plaintiff to provide adequate security, at the petition of the defendant." — https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb</sup>

**第二項**  前項の申立てをするには、同項の訴えの提起が不正の目的（不正の利益を得る目的、他人に損害を加える目的その他の不正の目的をいう。）によるものであることを疎明しなければならない。
<sup>art-78/par-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-78/par-2</sup>
In order to file the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph, the fact that the action set forth in the paragraph has been filed for a wrongful purpose (meaning for the purpose of acquiring a wrongful benefit, for the purpose of harming another person, or for any other wrongful purpose) must be shown by prima facie evidence.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第七十九条
<sup>art-79 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-79</sup>

**第一項**  裁判所は、第二十四条の規定による侵害の停止又は予防に関する訴えが提起されたときは、その旨を公正取引委員会に通知するものとする。
<sup>art-79/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-79/par-1</sup>
When an action to suspend or prevent an infringement under the provisions of Article 24 has been filed, the court is to notify the Japan Fair Trade Commission to that effect.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第二項**  裁判所は、前項の訴えが提起されたときは、公正取引委員会に対し、当該事件に関するこの法律の適用その他の必要な事項について、意見を求めることができる。
<sup>art-79/par-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-79/par-2</sup>
When an action set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed, the court may ask for the opinion of the Japan Fair Trade Commission with respect to the application of this Act in the case concerned or with respect to other necessary matters.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第三項**  公正取引委員会は、第一項の訴えが提起されたときは、裁判所の許可を得て、裁判所に対し、当該事件に関するこの法律の適用その他の必要な事項について、意見を述べることができる。
<sup>art-79/par-3 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-79/par-3</sup>
When an action set forth in paragraph (1) has been filed, with the permission of the court, the Japan Fair Trade Commission may state an opinion to the court on the application of this Act in the case concerned or with respect to other necessary matters.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十条
<sup>art-80 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80</sup>

**第一項**  裁判所は、第二十四条の規定による侵害の停止又は予防に関する訴訟においては、当事者の申立てにより、当事者に対し、当該侵害行為について立証するため必要な書類又は電磁的記録（電子的方式、磁気的方式その他人の知覚によつては認識することができない方式で作られる記録であつて、電子計算機による情報処理の用に供されるものをいう。以下同じ。）の提出を命ずることができる。ただし、その書類の所持者又はその電磁的記録を利用する権限を有する者においてその提出を拒むことについて正当な理由があるときは、この限りでない。
<sup>art-80/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80/par-1</sup>
In an action to suspend or prevent an infringement under the provisions of Article 24, upon petition of a party, the court may order a party to produce any documents or electronic or magnetic records (meaning records used in computerized information processing which is created in electronic form, magnetic form, or any other form that cannot be perceived by the human senses; the same applies hereinafter) necessary to prove the alleged infringement; provided, however, this does not apply if the holder of the documents or the person with authority to use the electronic or magnetic records has justifiable grounds for refusing to produce them.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第二項**  裁判所は、前項ただし書に規定する正当な理由があるかどうかの判断をするため必要があると認めるときは、書類の所持者又は電磁的記録を利用する権限を有する者にその提示をさせることができる。この場合においては、何人も、その提示された書類又は電磁的記録の開示を求めることができない。
<sup>art-80/par-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80/par-2</sup>
If the court finds it to be necessary in order to ascertain the existence of a justifiable reason prescribed in the proviso to the preceding paragraph, it may require the holder of the documents or a person with authority to use electronic or magnetic records to produce them. In this case, no person may request disclosure of the produced documents or electronic or magnetic records.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第三項**  裁判所は、前項の場合において、第一項ただし書に規定する正当な理由があるかどうかについて前項後段の書類又は電磁的記録を開示してその意見を聴くことが必要であると認めるときは、当事者等（当事者（法人である場合にあつては、その代表者）又は当事者の代理人（訴訟代理人及び補佐人を除く。）、使用人その他の従業者をいう。次条第一項において同じ。）、訴訟代理人又は補佐人に対し、当該書類又は当該電磁的記録を開示することができる。
<sup>art-80/par-3 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80/par-3</sup>
In cases under the preceding paragraph, if the court finds it necessary to disclose the documents or electronic or magnetic records prescribed in the second sentence of the preceding paragraph, and to hear the opinions of a party, etc. (meaning a party (or for a corporation, meaning its representative), an agent (excluding a counsel or an assistant), an employee, or any other worker of a party; the same applies in paragraph (1) of the following Article) on whether there is a justifiable reason prescribed in the proviso to paragraph (1), it may disclose the relevant documents or electronic or magnetic records to the party, etc., a counsel or an assistant.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation with a slip corrected by this site — not the Ministry's text; the Ministry printed: "In cases under the preceding paragraph, if the court finds it necessary to disclose the documents or electronic or magnetic records prescribed in the second sentence of the preceding paragraph, and to hear the opinions of a party, etc. (meaning a party (or for a corporation, meaning its representative), an agent (excluding a counsel or an assistant), an employee, or any other worker of a party; the same applies in paragraph (1) of the following Article), it may disclose the relevant documents or electronic or magnetic records to the party, etc., a counsel or an assistant." — https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb</sup>

**第四項**  前三項の規定は、第二十四条の規定による侵害の停止又は予防に関する訴訟における当該侵害行為について立証するため必要な検証の目的の提示について準用する。
<sup>art-80/par-4 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80/par-4</sup>
The provisions of the preceding three paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis to the production of objects for inspection necessary to prove the alleged acts of infringement in an action to suspend or prevent an infringement under the provisions of Article 24.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十一条
<sup>art-81 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81</sup>

**第一項**  裁判所は、第二十四条の規定による侵害の停止又は予防に関する訴訟において、その当事者が保有する営業秘密（不正競争防止法（平成五年法律第四十七号）第二条第六項に規定する営業秘密をいう。以下同じ。）について、次に掲げる事由のいずれにも該当することにつき疎明があつた場合には、当事者の申立てにより、決定で、当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人に対し、当該営業秘密を当該訴訟の追行の目的以外の目的で使用し、又は当該営業秘密に係るこの項の規定による命令を受けた者以外の者に開示してはならない旨を命ずることができる。ただし、その申立ての時までに当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人が第一号に規定する準備書面の閲読又は同号に規定する証拠の取調べ若しくは開示以外の方法により当該営業秘密を取得し、又は保有していた場合は、この限りでない。
<sup>art-81/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-1</sup>
In an action to suspend or prevent an infringement under the provisions of Article 24, if a prima facie showing of both of the following grounds has been made with regard to a trade secret (meaning a trade secret as provided in Article 2, paragraph (6) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993); the same applies hereinafter) held by a party to the action, the court may order the parties, etc., counsel, or an assistant not to use the trade secret for any purpose other than pursuing the action, and not to disclose the trade secret to anyone other than a person subject to the order prescribed in this paragraph provided, however, that this does not apply if the party, etc., counsel, or the assistant had already acquired or held the trade secret by means other than reading the brief prescribed in item (i) or through the examination or disclosure of evidence prescribed in the same item:
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation with a slip corrected by this site — not the Ministry's text; the Ministry printed: "In an action to suspend or prevent an infringement under the provisions of Article 24, if a prima facie showing both of the following grounds has been made with regard to a trade secret (meaning a trade secret as provided in Article 2, paragraph (6) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993); the same applies hereinafter) held by a party to the action, the court may order the parties, etc., counsel, or an assistant not to use the trade secret for any purpose other than pursuing the action, and not to disclose the trade secret to anyone other than a person subject to the order prescribed in this paragraph provided, however, that this does not apply if the party, etc., counsel, or the assistant had already acquired or held the trade secret by means other than reading the brief prescribed in item (i) or through the examination or disclosure of evidence prescribed in the same item:" — https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb</sup>

  **一**  既に提出され、若しくは提出されるべき準備書面に当事者の保有する営業秘密が記載され、又は既に取り調べられ、若しくは取り調べられるべき証拠（前条第三項の規定により開示された書類又は電磁的記録を含む。）の内容に当事者の保有する営業秘密が含まれること。
  <sup>art-81/par-1/item-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-1/item-1</sup>
  the trade secret held by the party, is written in an already-produced or to-be-produced brief, or included in the contents of already-examined or to-be-examined evidence (including documents or electronic or magnetic records disclosed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3) of the preceding Article); and
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **二**  前号の営業秘密が当該訴訟の追行の目的以外の目的で使用され、又は当該営業秘密が開示されることにより、当該営業秘密に基づく当事者の事業活動に支障を生ずるおそれがあり、これを防止するため当該営業秘密の使用又は開示を制限する必要があること。
  <sup>art-81/par-1/item-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-1/item-2</sup>
  the party's business activities based on the trade secret under the preceding item are likely to be hindered by the use of the relevant trade secret for a purpose other than conduct of suit or its disclosure, and it is necessary to restrict the use or disclosure of the trade secret in order to prevent this.
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第二項**  前項の規定による命令（以下「秘密保持命令」という。）の申立ては、次に掲げる事項を記載した書面でしなければならない。
<sup>art-81/par-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-2</sup>
A petition for the order prescribed in the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as the "protective order") must be in writing and include the following matters:
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **一**  秘密保持命令を受けるべき者
  <sup>art-81/par-2/item-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-2/item-1</sup>
  a person to whom the protective order is to be issued;
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation with a slip corrected by this site — not the Ministry's text; the Ministry printed: "a person to whom the protective order to be issued;" — https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb</sup>

  **二**  秘密保持命令の対象となるべき営業秘密を特定するに足りる事実
  <sup>art-81/par-2/item-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-2/item-2</sup>
  facts that are sufficient for identifying the trade secret to be the subject to the protective order; and
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **三**  前項各号に掲げる事由に該当する事実
  <sup>art-81/par-2/item-3 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-2/item-3</sup>
  facts that fall under the grounds listed in each of the items of the preceding paragraph.
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第三項**  秘密保持命令が発せられた場合には、その電子決定書（民事訴訟法第百二十二条において準用する同法第二百五十二条第一項の規定により作成された電磁的記録（同法第百二十二条において準用する同法第二百五十三条第二項の規定により裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録されたものに限る。）をいう。以下同じ。）を秘密保持命令を受けた者に送達しなければならない。
<sup>art-81/par-3 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-3</sup>
When the court issues a protective order, it must serve an electronic decision (meaning an electronic or magnetic record prepared pursuant to the provisions of the Article 252, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provisions of the Article 122 of the Code (limited to one that is recorded in a file stored on a computer used by the court pursuant to the provisions of the Article 253, paragraph (2) of the Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provisions of the Article 122 of the Code); the same applies hereinafter) on the person to whom the protective order was issued.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第四項**  秘密保持命令は、秘密保持命令を受けた者に対する電子決定書の送達がされた時から、効力を生ずる。
<sup>art-81/par-4 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-4</sup>
A protective order takes effect when an electronic decision is served on the person to whom the protective order was issued.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第五項**  秘密保持命令の申立てを却下した裁判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
<sup>art-81/par-5 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-5</sup>
If the court dismisses a petition for a protective order, the party may lodge an immediate appeal against the decision.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十二条
<sup>art-82 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-82</sup>

**第一項**  秘密保持命令の申立てをした者又は秘密保持命令を受けた者は、訴訟記録の存する裁判所（訴訟記録の存する裁判所がない場合にあつては、秘密保持命令を発した裁判所）に対し、前条第一項に規定する要件を欠くこと又はこれを欠くに至つたことを理由として、秘密保持命令の取消しの申立てをすることができる。
<sup>art-82/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-82/par-1</sup>
A petitioner for a protective order or a person to whom a protective order was issued may file a petition for rescission of the protective order with the court that retains the case record (if no such court exists, the court that issued the protective order) on the grounds that the requirements prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article have not been met or are no longer met.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation with a slip corrected by this site — not the Ministry's text; the Ministry printed: "A petitioner for a protective order or a person to whom a protective order was issued may file a petition for rescission of the protective order with the court that retains the case record (if no such court exists, the court that issued the protective order) on the grounds that the requirement prescribed in the preceding Article have not been met or are no longer met." — https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb</sup>

**第二項**  秘密保持命令の取消しの申立てについての裁判があつた場合には、その電子決定書をその申立てをした者及び相手方に送達しなければならない。
<sup>art-82/par-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-82/par-2</sup>
When the court makes a decision on a petition for rescission of a protective order, it must serve an electronic decision on the petitioner and the adverse party.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第三項**  秘密保持命令の取消しの申立てについての裁判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
<sup>art-82/par-3 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-82/par-3</sup>
An immediate appeal may be lodged against a decision on the petition for rescission of a protective order.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第四項**  秘密保持命令を取り消す裁判は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。
<sup>art-82/par-4 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-82/par-4</sup>
A decision to rescind a protective order must not take effect until the decision becomes final and binding.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第五項**  裁判所は、秘密保持命令を取り消す裁判をした場合において、秘密保持命令の取消しの申立てをした者又は相手方以外に当該秘密保持命令が発せられた訴訟において当該営業秘密に係る秘密保持命令を受けている者があるときは、その者に対し、直ちに、秘密保持命令を取り消す裁判をした旨を通知しなければならない。
<sup>art-82/par-5 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-82/par-5</sup>
When a court has rendered a decision to rescind a protective order, if the court had issued a protective order for the protection of the trade secret against any person other than the petitioner for rescission of the protective order or the adverse party during the same action in which the protective order was issued, the court must immediately notify the person of its decision to rescind the protective order.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation with a slip corrected by this site — not the Ministry's text; the Ministry printed: "When a court has rendered a decision to dismiss a protective order, if the court had issued a protective order for the protection of the trade secret against any person other than the petitioner for rescission of the protective order or the adverse party during the same action in which the protective order was issued, the court must immediately notify the person of its decision to rescind the protective order." — https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb</sup>

### 第八十三条
<sup>art-83 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-83</sup>

**第一項**  秘密保持命令が発せられた訴訟（すべての秘密保持命令が取り消された訴訟を除く。）に係る訴訟記録につき、民事訴訟法第九十二条第一項の決定があつた場合において、当事者から同項に規定する秘密記載部分の閲覧等の請求があり、かつ、その請求の手続を行つた者が当該訴訟において秘密保持命令を受けていない者であるときは、裁判所書記官は、同項の申立てをした当事者（その請求をした者を除く。第三項において同じ。）に対し、その請求後直ちに、その請求があつた旨を通知しなければならない。
<sup>art-83/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-83/par-1</sup>
When a court has issued a ruling under Article 92, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure with regard to the case record for an action in which a protective order has been issued (excluding an action in which all the protective orders have been rescinded), if a party requests to conduct an inspection, etc. of the portion of the record that includes the secret provided for in the paragraph, and the person who makes the request was not subject to a protective order in the action, immediately after the request is made, the court clerk must notify the party that filed the petition under the paragraph (excluding the requestor; the same applies in paragraph (3)) of the fact that the request was made.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第二項**  前項の場合において、裁判所書記官は、同項の請求があつた日から二週間を経過する日までの間（その請求の手続を行つた者に対する秘密保持命令の申立てがその日までにされた場合にあつては、その申立てについての裁判が確定するまでの間）、その請求の手続を行つた者に同項の秘密記載部分の閲覧等をさせてはならない。
<sup>art-83/par-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-83/par-2</sup>
In cases under the preceding paragraph, the court clerk must not allow the party who performed the procedure for the request under the paragraph to conduct an inspection, etc. of the portion of the record that represents the secret until two weeks have passed since the date of the request (if a petition for a protective order against the person who performed the procedure for the request was filed on or before the date, until the date on which the decision on the petition becomes final and binding).
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第三項**  前二項の規定は、第一項の請求をした者に同項の秘密記載部分の閲覧等をさせることについて民事訴訟法第九十二条第一項の申立てをした当事者のすべての同意があるときは、適用しない。
<sup>art-83/par-3 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-83/par-3</sup>
The provisions of the preceding two paragraphs do not apply if all parties who filed a petition under Article 92, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure consent to allow the party who made the request under paragraph (1) to conduct an inspection, etc. of the portion of the record that represents the secret.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十四条
<sup>art-84 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84</sup>

**第一項**  第二十五条の規定による損害賠償に関する訴えが提起されたときは、裁判所は、公正取引委員会に対し、同条に規定する違反行為によつて生じた損害の額について、意見を求めることができる。
<sup>art-84/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84/par-1</sup>
Whenever an action for damages under the provisions of Article 25 has been filed, the court may ask for the opinion of the Japan Fair Trade Commission with respect to the amount of damages caused by the violations as provided in the Article.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第二項**  前項の規定は、第二十五条の規定による損害賠償の請求が、相殺のために裁判上主張された場合に、これを準用する。
<sup>art-84/par-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84/par-2</sup>
If a claim for damages under the provisions of Article 25 is made in court proceedings for the purpose of a set-off, the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十四条の二
<sup>art-84-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2</sup>

**第一項**  第二十四条の規定による侵害の停止又は予防に関する訴えについて、民事訴訟法第四条及び第五条の規定により次の各号に掲げる裁判所が管轄権を有する場合には、それぞれ当該各号に定める裁判所にも、その訴えを提起することができる。
<sup>art-84-2/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1</sup>
When a court listed in one of the following items has jurisdiction over an action to suspend or prevent an infringement under the provisions of Article 24 pursuant to the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the action may also be filed with the court set forth in the relevant item:
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **一**  東京高等裁判所の管轄区域内に所在する地方裁判所（東京地方裁判所を除く。）、大阪地方裁判所、名古屋地方裁判所、広島地方裁判所、福岡地方裁判所、仙台地方裁判所、札幌地方裁判所又は高松地方裁判所　東京地方裁判所
  <sup>art-84-2/par-1/item-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1/item-1</sup>
  a district court located within the jurisdiction of the Tokyo High Court (excluding Tokyo District Court), Osaka District Court, Nagoya District Court, Hiroshima District Court, Fukuoka District Court, Sendai District Court, Sapporo District Court, or Takamatsu District Court: Tokyo District Court;
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **二**  大阪高等裁判所の管轄区域内に所在する地方裁判所（大阪地方裁判所を除く。）　東京地方裁判所又は大阪地方裁判所
  <sup>art-84-2/par-1/item-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1/item-2</sup>
  a district court located within the jurisdiction of the Osaka High Court (excluding Osaka District Court): Tokyo District Court or Osaka District Court;
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **三**  名古屋高等裁判所の管轄区域内に所在する地方裁判所（名古屋地方裁判所を除く。）　東京地方裁判所又は名古屋地方裁判所
  <sup>art-84-2/par-1/item-3 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1/item-3</sup>
  a district court located within the jurisdiction of the Nagoya High Court (excluding Nagoya District Court): Tokyo District Court or Nagoya District Court;
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **四**  広島高等裁判所の管轄区域内に所在する地方裁判所（広島地方裁判所を除く。）　東京地方裁判所又は広島地方裁判所
  <sup>art-84-2/par-1/item-4 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1/item-4</sup>
  a district court located within the jurisdiction of the Hiroshima High Court (excluding Hiroshima District Court): Tokyo District Court or Hiroshima District Court;
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **五**  福岡高等裁判所の管轄区域内に所在する地方裁判所（福岡地方裁判所を除く。）　東京地方裁判所又は福岡地方裁判所
  <sup>art-84-2/par-1/item-5 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1/item-5</sup>
  a district court located within the jurisdiction of the Fukuoka High Court (excluding Fukuoka District Court): Tokyo District Court or Fukuoka District Court;
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **六**  仙台高等裁判所の管轄区域内に所在する地方裁判所（仙台地方裁判所を除く。）　東京地方裁判所又は仙台地方裁判所
  <sup>art-84-2/par-1/item-6 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1/item-6</sup>
  a district court located within the jurisdiction of the Sendai High Court (excluding Sendai District Court): Tokyo District Court or Sendai District Court;
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **七**  札幌高等裁判所の管轄区域内に所在する地方裁判所（札幌地方裁判所を除く。）　東京地方裁判所又は札幌地方裁判所
  <sup>art-84-2/par-1/item-7 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1/item-7</sup>
  a district court located within the jurisdiction of the Sapporo High Court (excluding Sapporo District Court): Tokyo District Court or Sapporo District Court; or
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **八**  高松高等裁判所の管轄区域内に所在する地方裁判所（高松地方裁判所を除く。）　東京地方裁判所又は高松地方裁判所
  <sup>art-84-2/par-1/item-8 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1/item-8</sup>
  a district court located within the jurisdiction of the Takamatsu High Court (excluding the Takamatsu District Court): Tokyo District Court or Takamatsu District Court.
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第二項**  一の訴えで第二十四条の規定による請求を含む数個の請求をする場合における民事訴訟法第七条の規定の適用については、同条中「第四条から前条まで（第六条第三項を除く。）」とあるのは、「第四条から前条まで（第六条第三項を除く。）及び私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八十四条の二第一項」とする。
<sup>art-84-2/par-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-2</sup>
With respect to the application of the provisions of Article 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure to a case in which several claims are made in one action, including a claim under the provisions of Article 24 of this Act, the term "Article 4 through the preceding Article (excluding Article 6, paragraph (3))" in Article 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure is deemed to be replaced with "Article 4 through the preceding Article (excluding Article 6, paragraph (3)), and Article 84-2, paragraph (1) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade".
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十四条の三
<sup>art-84-3 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-3</sup>

**第一項**  第八十九条から第九十一条までの罪に係る訴訟の第一審の裁判権は、地方裁判所に属する。
<sup>art-84-3/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-3/par-1</sup>
The jurisdiction of the first instance over any action involving a crime provided for in Articles 89 through 91 lies in the district courts.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十四条の四
<sup>art-84-4 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-4</sup>

**第一項**  前条に規定する罪に係る事件について、刑事訴訟法（昭和二十三年法律第百三十一号）第二条の規定により第八十四条の二第一項各号に掲げる裁判所が管轄権を有する場合には、それぞれ当該各号に定める裁判所も、その事件を管轄することができる。
<sup>art-84-4/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-4/par-1</sup>
If a court listed in one of the items under Article 84-2, paragraph (1) has jurisdiction over a case connected with crimes provided in the preceding Article pursuant to the provisions of Article 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Act No. 131 of 1948), the court prescribed in the relevant item also has jurisdiction over the case.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十五条
<sup>art-85 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-85</sup>

**第一項**  次に掲げる訴訟及び事件は、東京地方裁判所の管轄に専属する。
<sup>art-85/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-85/par-1</sup>
Any following action and case is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Tokyo District Court:
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **一**  排除措置命令等に係る行政事件訴訟法第三条第一項に規定する抗告訴訟
  <sup>art-85/par-1/item-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-85/par-1/item-1</sup>
  action for the judicial review of an administrative disposition under Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Administrative Case Litigation Act in connection with the cease and desist order, etc.; and
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

  **二**  第七十条の四第一項、第七十条の五第一項及び第二項、第九十七条並びに第九十八条に規定する事件
  <sup>art-85/par-1/item-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-85/par-1/item-2</sup>
  any case provided for in Article 70-4, paragraph (1), Article 70-5, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 97, and Article 98.
  <sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十五条の二
<sup>art-85-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-85-2</sup>

**第一項**  第二十五条の規定による損害賠償に係る訴訟の第一審の裁判権は、東京地方裁判所に属する。
<sup>art-85-2/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-85-2/par-1</sup>
The jurisdiction of the first instance over any actions concerning compensation for damages pursuant to the provisions of Article 25 is to lie with the Tokyo District Court.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十六条
<sup>art-86 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-86</sup>

**第一項**  東京地方裁判所は、第八十五条各号に掲げる訴訟及び事件並びに前条に規定する訴訟については、三人の裁判官の合議体で審理及び裁判をする。
<sup>art-86/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-86/par-1</sup>
The Tokyo District Court is to conduct a proceeding and make a judicial decision by a panel consisting of three judges for action and case provided for in Article 85, as well as actions provided for in the preceding Article.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

**第二項**  前項の規定にかかわらず、東京地方裁判所は、同項の訴訟及び事件について、五人の裁判官の合議体で審理及び裁判をする旨の決定をその合議体ですることができる。
<sup>art-86/par-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-86/par-2</sup>
Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Tokyo District Court, with regard to the action and case in the preceding paragraph, may make a ruling by the panel of five judges who are to conduct a proceeding and make a judicial decision.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation with a slip corrected by this site — not the Ministry's text; the Ministry printed: "Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Tokyo District Court, with regard to the action and case preceding paragraph, may make a ruling by the panel of five judges who are to conduct a proceeding and make a judicial decision." — https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb</sup>

**第三項**  前項の場合には、判事補は、同時に三人以上合議体に加わり、又は裁判長となることができない。
<sup>art-86/par-3 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-86/par-3</sup>
In the case of the preceding paragraph, the panel may not contain three or more assistant judges simultaneously, and no assistant judge may serve as the presiding judge.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十七条
<sup>art-87 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-87</sup>

**第一項**  東京地方裁判所がした第八十五条第一号に掲げる訴訟若しくは第八十五条の二に規定する訴訟についての終局判決に対する控訴又は第八十五条第二号に掲げる事件についての決定に対する抗告が提起された東京高等裁判所においては、当該控訴又は抗告に係る事件について、五人の裁判官の合議体で審理及び裁判をする旨の決定をその合議体ですることができる。
<sup>art-87/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-87/par-1</sup>
With regard to the case subject to appeal to the Tokyo High Court against a final judgment made by the Tokyo District Court for the action or suit set forth in Article 85, item (i) or the action or suit pursuant to Article 85-2 or the case subject to appeal to the Tokyo High Court against a ruling made by the Tokyo District Court for the case as set forth in Article 85, item (ii), in the Tokyo High Court, a panel may make a ruling that the panel of five judges conducts a proceeding and make a judicial decision on that case.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

### 第八十七条の二
<sup>art-87-2 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-87-2</sup>

**第一項**  裁判所は、第二十四条の規定による侵害の停止又は予防に関する訴えが提起された場合において、他の裁判所に同一又は同種の行為に係る同条の規定による訴訟が係属しているときは、当事者の住所又は所在地、尋問を受けるべき証人の住所、争点又は証拠の共通性その他の事情を考慮して、相当と認めるときは、申立てにより又は職権で、訴訟の全部又は一部について、当該他の裁判所又は当該訴えにつき第八十四条の二第一項の規定により管轄権を有する他の裁判所に移送することができる。
<sup>art-87-2/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-87-2/par-1</sup>
If an action to suspend or prevent an infringement pursuant to the provisions of Article 24 has been filed, and an action pursuant to the Article in connection with the same or similar acts are pending before another court, when the court finds it proper in consideration of the addresses or locations of the parties, addresses of witnesses to be examined, the commonality of issues or evidence, and any other circumstances, the court may transfer the case in whole or in part to the relevant other court or other courts having jurisdiction over the relevant action pursuant to the provisions of Article 84-2, paragraph (1), upon petition or by the court's own authority.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation with a slip corrected by this site — not the Ministry's text; the Ministry printed: "If an action to suspend or prevent an infringement pursuant to the provisions of Article 24 has been filed, and an action pursuant to the Article in connection with the same or similar acts are pending before another court, when the court finds it proper in consideration of the addresses or locations of the parties, addresses of witnesses to be examined, the commonality of issues or evidence, and any other circumstances, the court may transfer, the case in whole or in part to the relevant other court or other courts having jurisdiction over the relevant action, by the court's own authority pursuant to the provisions of Article 84-2, paragraph (1)." — https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb</sup>

### 第八十八条
<sup>art-88 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-88</sup>

**第一項**  排除措置命令等に係る行政事件訴訟法第三条第一項に規定する抗告訴訟については、国の利害に関係のある訴訟についての法務大臣の権限等に関する法律（昭和二十二年法律第百九十四号）第六条の規定は、適用しない。
<sup>art-88/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-88/par-1</sup>
With respect to an action for the judicial review of an administrative disposition under Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Administrative Case Litigation Act in connection with a cease and desist order, etc., the provisions of Article 6 of the Act on the Authority of the Minister of Justice over Suits Relating to the Interests of the State (Act No. 194 of 1947) do not apply.
<sup>Ministry of Justice translation — Japanese Law Translation Database System</sup>

---

## Cites
- art-77/par-1: 行政事件訴訟法（昭和三十七年法律第百三十九号）第三条第一項 → 行政事件訴訟法 第三条第一項 (Article 3, paragraph (1)), art-3/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/administrative-case-litigation-act/art-3/par-1 (e-Gov law ID 337AC0000000139)
- art-78/par-1: 第二十四条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第二十四条 (Article 24), art-24 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-24
- art-78/par-2: 前項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第七十八条第一項 (Article 78, paragraph (1)), art-78/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-78/par-1
- art-79/par-1: 第二十四条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第二十四条 (Article 24), art-24 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-24
- art-79/par-2: 前項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第七十九条第一項 (Article 79, paragraph (1)), art-79/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-79/par-1
- art-79/par-3: 第一項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第七十九条第一項 (Article 79, paragraph (1)), art-79/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-79/par-1
- art-80/par-1: 第二十四条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第二十四条 (Article 24), art-24 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-24
- art-80/par-2: 前項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十条第一項 (Article 80, paragraph (1)), art-80/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80/par-1
- art-80/par-3: 前項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十条第二項 (Article 80, paragraph (2)), art-80/par-2 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80/par-2
- art-80/par-3: 第一項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十条第一項 (Article 80, paragraph (1)), art-80/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80/par-1
- art-80/par-3: 次条第一項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十一条第一項 (Article 81, paragraph (1)), art-81/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-1
- art-80/par-4: 前三項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十条第一項 (Article 80, paragraph (1)), art-80/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80/par-1
- art-80/par-4: 前三項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十条第二項 (Article 80, paragraph (2)), art-80/par-2 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80/par-2
- art-80/par-4: 前三項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十条第三項 (Article 80, paragraph (3)), art-80/par-3 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80/par-3
- art-80/par-4: 第二十四条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第二十四条 (Article 24), art-24 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-24
- art-81/par-1: 第二十四条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第二十四条 (Article 24), art-24 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-24
- art-81/par-1: 不正競争防止法（平成五年法律第四十七号）第二条第六項 → 不正競争防止法 第二条第六項 (Article 2, paragraph (6)), art-2/par-6 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/unfair-competition-prevention-act/art-2/par-6 (e-Gov law ID 405AC0000000047)
- art-81/par-1: この項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十一条第一項 (Article 81, paragraph (1)), art-81/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-1
- art-81/par-1: 第一号 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十一条第一項第一号 (Article 81, paragraph (1), item (i)), art-81/par-1/item-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-1/item-1
- art-81/par-1/item-1: 前条第三項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十条第三項 (Article 80, paragraph (3)), art-80/par-3 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-80/par-3
- art-81/par-1/item-2: 前号 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十一条第一項第一号 (Article 81, paragraph (1), item (i)), art-81/par-1/item-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-1/item-1
- art-81/par-2: 前項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十一条第一項 (Article 81, paragraph (1)), art-81/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-1
- art-81/par-2/item-3: 前項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十一条第一項 (Article 81, paragraph (1)), art-81/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-1
- art-81/par-3: 民事訴訟法第百二十二条 → 民事訴訟法 第百二十二条 (Article 122), art-122 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-122 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-81/par-3: 同法第二百五十二条第一項 → 民事訴訟法 第二百五十二条第一項 (Article 252, paragraph (1)), art-252/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-252/par-1 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-81/par-3: 同法第二百五十三条第二項 → 民事訴訟法 第二百五十三条第二項 (Article 253, paragraph (2)), art-253/par-2 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-253/par-2 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-82/par-1: 前条第一項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十一条第一項 (Article 81, paragraph (1)), art-81/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-81/par-1
- art-83/par-1: 民事訴訟法第九十二条第一項 → 民事訴訟法 第九十二条第一項 (Article 92, paragraph (1)), art-92/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-92/par-1 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-83/par-1: 第三項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十三条第三項 (Article 83, paragraph (3)), art-83/par-3 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-83/par-3
- art-83/par-2: 前項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十三条第一項 (Article 83, paragraph (1)), art-83/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-83/par-1
- art-83/par-3: 前二項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十三条第一項 (Article 83, paragraph (1)), art-83/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-83/par-1
- art-83/par-3: 前二項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十三条第二項 (Article 83, paragraph (2)), art-83/par-2 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-83/par-2
- art-83/par-3: 民事訴訟法第九十二条第一項 → 民事訴訟法 第九十二条第一項 (Article 92, paragraph (1)), art-92/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-92/par-1 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-84/par-1: 第二十五条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第二十五条 (Article 25), art-25 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-25
- art-84/par-2: 前項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十四条第一項 (Article 84, paragraph (1)), art-84/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84/par-1
- art-84/par-2: 第二十五条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第二十五条 (Article 25), art-25 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-25
- art-84-2/par-1: 第二十四条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第二十四条 (Article 24), art-24 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-24
- art-84-2/par-1: 民事訴訟法第四条 → 民事訴訟法 第四条 (Article 4), art-4 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-4 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-84-2/par-1: 第五条 → 民事訴訟法 第五条 (Article 5), art-5 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-5 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-84-2/par-2: 第二十四条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第二十四条 (Article 24), art-24 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-24
- art-84-2/par-2: 民事訴訟法第七条 → 民事訴訟法 第七条 (Article 7), art-7 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-7 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-84-2/par-2: 第四条から前条まで → 民事訴訟法 第四条 (Article 4), art-4 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-4 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-84-2/par-2: 第四条から前条まで → 民事訴訟法 第五条 (Article 5), art-5 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-5 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-84-2/par-2: 第四条から前条まで → 民事訴訟法 第六条 (Article 6), art-6 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-6 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-84-2/par-2: 第四条から前条まで → 民事訴訟法 第六条の二 (Article 6-2), art-6-2 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-6-2 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-84-2/par-2: 第六条第三項 → 民事訴訟法 第六条第三項 (Article 6, paragraph (3)), art-6/par-3 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-civil-procedure/art-6/par-3 (e-Gov law ID 408AC0000000109)
- art-84-2/par-2: 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八十四条の二第一項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十四条の二第一項 (Article 84-2, paragraph (1)), art-84-2/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1
- art-84-3/par-1: 第八十九条から第九十一条まで → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十九条 (Article 89), art-89 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-89
- art-84-3/par-1: 第八十九条から第九十一条まで → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第九十条 (Article 90), art-90 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-90
- art-84-3/par-1: 第八十九条から第九十一条まで → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第九十一条 (Article 91), art-91 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-91
- art-84-4/par-1: 前条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十四条の三 (Article 84-3), art-84-3 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-3
- art-84-4/par-1: 刑事訴訟法（昭和二十三年法律第百三十一号）第二条 → 刑事訴訟法 第二条 (Article 2), art-2 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/code-of-criminal-procedure/art-2 (e-Gov law ID 323AC0000000131)
- art-84-4/par-1: 第八十四条の二第一項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十四条の二第一項 (Article 84-2, paragraph (1)), art-84-2/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1
- art-85/par-1/item-1: 行政事件訴訟法第三条第一項 → 行政事件訴訟法 第三条第一項 (Article 3, paragraph (1)), art-3/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/administrative-case-litigation-act/art-3/par-1 (e-Gov law ID 337AC0000000139)
- art-85/par-1/item-2: 第七十条の四第一項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第七十条の四第一項 (Article 70-4, paragraph (1)), art-70-4/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-70-4/par-1
- art-85/par-1/item-2: 第七十条の五第一項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第七十条の五第一項 (Article 70-5, paragraph (1)), art-70-5/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-70-5/par-1
- art-85/par-1/item-2: 第二項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第七十条の五第二項 (Article 70-5, paragraph (2)), art-70-5/par-2 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-70-5/par-2
- art-85/par-1/item-2: 第九十七条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第九十七条 (Article 97), art-97 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-97
- art-85/par-1/item-2: 第九十八条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第九十八条 (Article 98), art-98 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-98
- art-85-2/par-1: 第二十五条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第二十五条 (Article 25), art-25 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-25
- art-86/par-1: 第八十五条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十五条 (Article 85), art-85 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-85
- art-86/par-1: 前条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十五条の二 (Article 85-2), art-85-2 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-85-2
- art-86/par-2: 前項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十六条第一項 (Article 86, paragraph (1)), art-86/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-86/par-1
- art-86/par-3: 前項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十六条第二項 (Article 86, paragraph (2)), art-86/par-2 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-86/par-2
- art-87/par-1: 第八十五条第一号 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十五条第一項第一号 (Article 85, paragraph (1), item (i)), art-85/par-1/item-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-85/par-1/item-1
- art-87/par-1: 第八十五条の二 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十五条の二 (Article 85-2), art-85-2 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-85-2
- art-87/par-1: 第八十五条第二号 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十五条第一項第二号 (Article 85, paragraph (1), item (ii)), art-85/par-1/item-2 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-85/par-1/item-2
- art-87-2/par-1: 第二十四条 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第二十四条 (Article 24), art-24 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-24
- art-87-2/par-1: 第八十四条の二第一項 → 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 第八十四条の二第一項 (Article 84-2, paragraph (1)), art-84-2/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/antimonopoly-act/art-84-2/par-1
- art-88/par-1: 行政事件訴訟法第三条第一項 → 行政事件訴訟法 第三条第一項 (Article 3, paragraph (1)), art-3/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/ja/administrative-case-litigation-act/art-3/par-1 (e-Gov law ID 337AC0000000139)
- art-88/par-1: 国の利害に関係のある訴訟についての法務大臣の権限等に関する法律（昭和二十二年法律第百九十四号）第六条 → e-Gov law 322AC0000000194, 第六条 (Article 6), art-6 — not held in this collection

---

## Sources

- claude-opus-5-5 — Corrections to the Ministry of Justice's English of paragraphs, written 2026-11-06
- e-Gov 法令検索, Digital Agency (デジタル庁) — 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 — the text in force from 2026-05-21 (https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/322AC0000000054/20260521_505AC0000000063), retrieved 2026-11-06
- Japanese Law Translation Database System, Ministry of Justice (法務省) — Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律), Article 78, paragraph (1) — the Ministry of Justice's English as printed (https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb), retrieved 2026-11-06
- Japanese Law Translation Database System, Ministry of Justice (法務省) — Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律), Article 80, paragraph (3) — the Ministry of Justice's English as printed (https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb), retrieved 2026-11-06
- Japanese Law Translation Database System, Ministry of Justice (法務省) — Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律), Article 81, paragraph (1) — the Ministry of Justice's English as printed (https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb), retrieved 2026-11-06
- Japanese Law Translation Database System, Ministry of Justice (法務省) — Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律), Article 81, paragraph (2), item (i) — the Ministry of Justice's English as printed (https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb), retrieved 2026-11-06
- Japanese Law Translation Database System, Ministry of Justice (法務省) — Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律), Article 82, paragraph (1) — the Ministry of Justice's English as printed (https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb), retrieved 2026-11-06
- Japanese Law Translation Database System, Ministry of Justice (法務省) — Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律), Article 82, paragraph (5) — the Ministry of Justice's English as printed (https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb), retrieved 2026-11-06
- Japanese Law Translation Database System, Ministry of Justice (法務省) — Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律), Article 86, paragraph (2) — the Ministry of Justice's English as printed (https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb), retrieved 2026-11-06
- Japanese Law Translation Database System, Ministry of Justice (法務省) — Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律), Article 87-2, paragraph (1) — the Ministry of Justice's English as printed (https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb), retrieved 2026-11-06
- Japanese Law Translation Database System, Ministry of Justice (法務省) — Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade — Ministry of Justice translation (https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/5212/tb), retrieved 2026-11-06
- This site's parser, version 225 — 私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律 — structure, counts, cross-references and defined terms, computed 2026-11-06
