# 雇用保険法施行規則 / Ordinance for Enforcement of the Employment Insurance Act — 第三十六条 (Article 36) This is the Markdown twin of https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36. Every law, and how to address a provision: https://japanlaw.org/llms.txt. The same laws as MCP tools (no sign-in): https://japanlaw.org/mcp. - Law: 雇用保険法施行規則 (Ordinance for Enforcement of the Employment Insurance Act), 昭和五十年労働省令第三号 - English title "Ordinance for Enforcement of the Employment Insurance Act": claude-opus-5-5 - Kind: MinisterialOrdinance — the distinction between 法律 (Act), 政令 (Cabinet Order), 省令 (Ministerial Order) and 条例 (local ordinance) decides who may issue it and what it may say. - Provision: 第三十六条 (Article 36)（法第二十三条第二項第二号の厚生労働省令で定める理由） — address `art-36` - Text in force since: 2026-10-22 - URL (the page that opens at this provision): https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36 - e-Gov law ID: 350M50002000003 — never renamed. A permanent link, `/l/{lawId}/{address}` on this site, redirects to the page. - Every provision below carries its address and its URL on the line under it. - Japanese text: e-Gov 法令検索, Digital Agency (デジタル庁). English: as marked on each line below. Only the Japanese as published by the government has legal effect; the text below is a copy of it. Every English rendering below is a translation and says which kind: the Ministry of Justice's translation, or this site's machine translation, whose model and date the Sources list names. They are never merged and never substituted for one another. --- ### 第三十六条（法第二十三条第二項第二号の厚生労働省令で定める理由） — Reasons Specified by Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare under Article 23, Paragraph (2), Item (ii) of the Act caption: machine translation, not official art-36 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36 **第一項** 法第二十三条第二項第二号の厚生労働省令で定める理由は、次のとおりとする。 art-36/par-1 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1 The reasons specified by Order of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare under Article 23, paragraph (2), item (ii) of the Act are as follows: machine translation, not official **一** 解雇（自己の責めに帰すべき重大な理由によるものを除く。） art-36/par-1/item-1 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-1 dismissal (excluding dismissal for a serious reason attributable to the person); machine translation, not official **二** 労働契約の締結に際し明示された労働条件が事実と著しく相違したこと。 art-36/par-1/item-2 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-2 that the labor conditions expressly indicated at the time of conclusion of the labor contract were significantly different from the facts; machine translation, not official **三** 賃金（退職手当を除く。）の額を三で除して得た額を上回る額が支払期日までに支払われなかつたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-3 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-3 that an amount exceeding the amount obtained by dividing the amount of wages (excluding retirement allowances) by three was not paid by the payment due date; machine translation, not official **四** 次のいずれかに予期し得ず該当することとなつたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-4 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-4 that the person has unforeseeably come to fall under either of the following: machine translation, not official **イ** 離職の日の属する月以後六月のうちいずれかの月に支払われる賃金（最低賃金法第二条第三号に規定する賃金（同法第四条第三項第一号及び第二号に掲げる賃金並びに歩合によつて支払われる賃金を除く。）をいう。以下この号において同じ。）の額が当該月の前六月のうちいずれかの月の賃金の額に百分の八十五を乗じて得た額を下回ると見込まれることとなつたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-4/sub-1 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-4/sub-1 that it has come to be expected that the amount of wages (meaning wages prescribed in Article 2, item (iii) of the Minimum Wage Act (excluding the wages listed in Article 4, paragraph (3), items (i) and (ii) of that Act and wages paid on a commission basis); hereinafter the same in this item) paid in any of the six months on or after the month containing the day of separation from service will fall below the amount obtained by multiplying by 85/100 the amount of wages in any of the six months preceding that month; machine translation, not official **ロ** 離職の日の属する月の六月前から離職した日の属する月までのいずれかの月の賃金の額が当該月の前六月のうちいずれかの月の賃金の額に百分の八十五を乗じて得た額を下回つたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-4/sub-2 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-4/sub-2 that the amount of wages in any month from the month six months before the month containing the day of separation from service to the month containing the day of separation from service has fallen below the amount obtained by multiplying by 85/100 the amount of wages in any of the six months preceding that month; machine translation, not official **五** 次のいずれかに該当することとなつたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-5 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-5 that the person has come to fall under any of the following: machine translation, not official **イ** 離職の日の属する月の前六月のうちいずれか連続した三箇月以上の期間において労働基準法第三十六条第三項に規定する限度時間に相当する時間数（当該受給資格者が、育児・介護休業法第十七条第一項の小学校就学の始期に達するまでの子を養育する労働者であつて同項各号のいずれにも該当しないものである場合にあつては同項、育児・介護休業法第十八条第一項の要介護状態にある対象家族を介護する労働者であつて同項において準用する育児・介護休業法第十七条第一項各号のいずれにも該当しないものである場合にあつては同項に規定する制限時間に相当する時間数）を超えて、時間外労働及び休日労働が行われたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-1 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-1 that overtime work and work on days off was performed, in any period of three or more consecutive months within the six months preceding the month containing the day of separation from service, exceeding the number of hours equivalent to the maximum of overtime prescribed in Article 36, paragraph (3) of the Labor Standards Act (or, where the qualified recipient is a worker raising a child who has not yet reached the start of elementary school as prescribed in Article 17, paragraph (1) of the Childcare and Caregiver Leave Act and does not fall under any of the items of that paragraph, the number of hours equivalent to the limit on overtime prescribed in Article 17, paragraph (1) of that Act, and where the qualified recipient is a worker who takes care of an applicable family member requiring caregiving as prescribed in Article 18, paragraph (1) of that Act and does not fall under any of the items of Article 17, paragraph (1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18, paragraph (1) of that Act, the number of hours equivalent to the limit on overtime prescribed in Article 17, paragraph (1) of that Act); machine translation, not official **ロ** 離職の日の属する月の前六月のうちいずれかの月において一月当たり百時間以上、時間外労働及び休日労働が行われたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-2 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-2 that overtime work and work on days off was performed for 100 hours or more per month in any of the six months preceding the month containing the day of separation from service; machine translation, not official **ハ** 離職の日の属する月の前六月のうちいずれか連続した二箇月以上の期間の時間外労働時間及び休日労働時間を平均し一月当たり八十時間を超えて、時間外労働及び休日労働が行われたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-3 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-3 that overtime work and work on days off was performed in excess of 80 hours per month when the hours of overtime work and hours of work on days off in any period of two or more consecutive months within the six months preceding the month containing the day of separation from service are averaged; machine translation, not official **ニ** 事業主が危険又は健康障害の生ずるおそれがある旨を行政機関から指摘されたにもかかわらず、事業所において当該危険又は健康障害を防止するために必要な措置を講じなかつたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-4 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-4 that, although an administrative organ had pointed out to the employer that there was a risk of danger or health impairment arising, the employer did not take at the place of business the measures necessary to prevent that danger or health impairment; machine translation, not official **ホ** 事業主が法令に違反し、妊娠中若しくは出産後の労働者又は子の養育若しくは家族の介護を行う労働者を就業させ、若しくはそれらの者の雇用の継続等を図るための制度の利用を不当に制限したこと又は妊娠したこと、出産したこと若しくはそれらの制度の利用の申出をし、若しくは利用をしたこと等を理由として不利益な取扱いをしたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-5 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-5 that the employer, in violation of laws and regulations, made a worker who is pregnant or after childbirth, or a worker who is raising a child or caring for a family member, work, or unjustly restricted the use of systems for ensuring the continuation of employment, etc. of those persons, or engaged in disadvantageous treatment on the grounds of having become pregnant, having given birth, or having applied to use or used those systems, etc.; machine translation, not official **六** 事業主が労働者の職種転換等に際して、当該労働者の職業生活の継続のために必要な配慮を行つていないこと。 art-36/par-1/item-6 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-6 that the employer, upon a change of job category, etc. of a worker, has not given the consideration necessary for the continuation of that worker's vocational life; machine translation, not official **七** 期間の定めのある労働契約の更新により三年以上引き続き雇用されるに至つた場合において当該労働契約が更新されないこととなつたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-7 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-7 that, in the case where a person has come to be employed continuously for three years or more through renewal of a labor contract with a fixed term, that labor contract is not to be renewed; machine translation, not official **七の二** 期間の定めのある労働契約の締結に際し当該労働契約が更新されることが明示された場合において当該労働契約が更新されないこととなつたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-7-2 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-7-2 that, in the case where it was expressly indicated at the conclusion of a labor contract with a fixed term that the labor contract would be renewed, that labor contract is not to be renewed; machine translation, not official **八** 事業主又は当該事業主に雇用される労働者から就業環境が著しく害されるような言動を受けたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-8 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-8 that the person has been subjected by the employer or a worker employed by that employer to words or conduct that significantly harm the working environment; machine translation, not official **九** 事業主から退職するよう勧奨を受けたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-9 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-9 that the person has been encouraged by the employer to retire; machine translation, not official **十** 事業所において使用者の責めに帰すべき事由により行われた休業が引き続き三箇月以上となつたこと。 art-36/par-1/item-10 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-10 that an absence from work at the place of business for reasons attributable to the employer has continued for three months or more; machine translation, not official **十一** 事業所の業務が法令に違反したこと。 art-36/par-1/item-11 · https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-11 that the operations of the place of business have violated laws and regulations. machine translation, not official --- ## Cites - art-36: 法第二十三条第二項第二号 → 雇用保険法 第二十三条第二項第二号 (Article 23, paragraph (2), item (ii)), art-23/par-2/item-2 — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act/art-23/par-2/item-2 (e-Gov law ID 349AC0000000116) - art-36/par-1: 法第二十三条第二項第二号 → 雇用保険法 第二十三条第二項第二号 (Article 23, paragraph (2), item (ii)), art-23/par-2/item-2 — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act/art-23/par-2/item-2 (e-Gov law ID 349AC0000000116) - art-36/par-1/item-4/sub-1: 最低賃金法第二条第三号 → 最低賃金法 第二条第一項第三号 (Article 2, paragraph (1), item (iii)), art-2/par-1/item-3 — https://japanlaw.org/en/minimum-wage-act/art-2/par-1/item-3 (e-Gov law ID 334AC0000000137) - art-36/par-1/item-4/sub-1: 同法第四条第三項第一号 → 最低賃金法 第四条第三項第一号 (Article 4, paragraph (3), item (i)), art-4/par-3/item-1 — https://japanlaw.org/en/minimum-wage-act/art-4/par-3/item-1 (e-Gov law ID 334AC0000000137) - art-36/par-1/item-4/sub-1: 第二号 → 最低賃金法 第四条第三項第二号 (Article 4, paragraph (3), item (ii)), art-4/par-3/item-2 — https://japanlaw.org/en/minimum-wage-act/art-4/par-3/item-2 (e-Gov law ID 334AC0000000137) - art-36/par-1/item-4/sub-1: この号 → 雇用保険法施行規則 第三十六条第一項第四号 (Article 36, paragraph (1), item (iv)), art-36/par-1/item-4 — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-4 - art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-1: 労働基準法第三十六条第三項 → 労働基準法 第三十六条第三項 (Article 36, paragraph (3)), art-36/par-3 — https://japanlaw.org/en/labor-standards-act/art-36/par-3 (e-Gov law ID 322AC0000000049) - art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-1: 育児・介護休業法第十七条第一項 → 育児休業、介護休業等育児又は家族介護を行う労働者の福祉に関する法律 第十七条第一項 (Article 17, paragraph (1)), art-17/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/en/childcare-and-family-care-leave-act/art-17/par-1 (e-Gov law ID 403AC0000000076) - art-36/par-1/item-5/sub-1: 育児・介護休業法第十八条第一項 → 育児休業、介護休業等育児又は家族介護を行う労働者の福祉に関する法律 第十八条第一項 (Article 18, paragraph (1)), art-18/par-1 — https://japanlaw.org/en/childcare-and-family-care-leave-act/art-18/par-1 (e-Gov law ID 403AC0000000076) ## Cited by 10 provisions cite this one. No official source publishes this direction. - 雇用保険法施行規則 第七条第一項第二号（被保険者でなくなつたことの届出） — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-7/par-1/item-2 - 雇用保険法施行規則 第十四条の四第一項（特定理由離職者又は特定受給資格者の介護又は育児のための休業又は所定労働時間短縮の開始時の賃金の届出） — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-14-4/par-1 - 雇用保険法施行規則 第三十六条第一項第四号イ（法第二十三条第二項第二号の厚生労働省令で定める理由） — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-36/par-1/item-4/sub-1 - 雇用保険法施行規則 第六十五条の八第二項第二号（法第三十七条の五第二項の厚生労働省令で定める申出） — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-65-8/par-2/item-2 - 雇用保険法施行規則 第八十五条の四第一項（法第五十七条第二項第二号の厚生労働省令で定める理由） — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-85-4/par-1 - 雇用保険法施行規則 第百一条の二の三十第一項（法第六十条の四第二項第二号の厚生労働省令で定める理由） — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-101-2-30/par-1 - 雇用保険法施行規則 第百四十四条の二第一項（船員に関する特例） — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/art-144-2/par-1 - 雇用保険法施行規則 附則第一条の四第一項（特定受給資格者に関する暫定措置） — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/suppl-3509-3/art-1-4/par-1 - 雇用保険法施行規則 附則第二条第二項（経過措置） — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/suppl-4269-52/art-2/par-2 - 雇用保険法施行規則 附則第二条第三項（雇用保険法施行規則の一部改正に伴う経過措置） — https://japanlaw.org/en/employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance/suppl-4289-137/art-2/par-3 --- ## Sources - claude-opus-5-5 — English title of a law in this collection, written for this site, written 2026-11-06 - e-Gov 法令検索, Digital Agency (デジタル庁) — 雇用保険法施行規則 — the text in force from 2026-10-22 (https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/350M50002000003/20261022_508M60000100149), retrieved 2026-11-06 - claude-sonnet-5-5 — Machine translation, batch employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance-20261106T171536-011, translated 2026-11-07 - claude-sonnet-5-5 — Machine translation, batch employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance-20261106T171536-012, translated 2026-11-07 - claude-sonnet-5-5, corrected on review by claude-opus-5-5 — Machine translation corrected on review, batch employment-insurance-act-enforcement-ordinance-20261106T171536-012, translated 2026-11-07 - This site's parser, version 228 — 雇用保険法施行規則 — structure, counts, cross-references and defined terms, computed 2026-11-06