# Article 119, paragraph (2), its wordings — Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act

This is the Markdown twin of https://japanlaw.org/en/domestic-relations-case-procedure-act/history/art-119/par-2. Every law, and how to address a provision: https://japanlaw.org/llms.txt. The same laws as MCP tools (no sign-in): https://japanlaw.org/mcp.

How the wording of Article 119, paragraph (2) (第百十九条第二項) changed with each amendment, and how it will change.

- Law: Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act (家事事件手続法) — https://japanlaw.org/en/domestic-relations-case-procedure-act
- Provision: Article 119, paragraph (2) (第百十九条第二項) — https://japanlaw.org/en/domestic-relations-case-procedure-act/art-119/par-2 (as Markdown: https://japanlaw.org/md/en/domestic-relations-case-procedure-act/art-119/par-2)
- The law's amendments: https://japanlaw.org/en/domestic-relations-case-procedure-act/amendments
- 2 wordings, oldest first.

## 1. Before Act No. 45 of 2026

- State: In force

Japanese:

> 家庭裁判所は、成年被後見人の精神の状況につき医師の意見を聴かなければ、民法第十条の規定による後見開始の審判の取消しの審判をすることができない。ただし、明らかにその必要がないと認めるときは、この限りでない。

English (Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice):

> A family court may not make a ruling to revoke a ruling of the commencement of guardianship under the provisions of Article 10 of the Civil Code unless it hears the opinion of a physician concerning the mental state of an adult under guardianship; provided, however, that this does not apply if it finds the hearing of opinions to be obviously unnecessary.

## 2. By 23 December 2028 — Act No. 45 of 2026

- State: Not yet in force
- Takes effect: By 23 December 2028
- The amendment: Moved to paragraph (3) and reworded (Act No. 45 of 2026) — https://japanlaw.org/en/domestic-relations-case-procedure-act/amendments/20281223_508AC0000000045

Japanese:

> 家庭裁判所は、特定補助人を付する処分の審判を受けた者の精神の状況につき医師の意見を聴かなければ、民法第十二条第三項の規定による特定補助人を付する処分の審判の取消しの審判をすることができない。ただし、明らかにその必要がないと認めるときは、この限りでない。

English (Machine translation, not official):

> A family court may not make a ruling to revoke a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant under the provisions of Article 12, paragraph (3) of the Civil Code unless it hears the opinion of a physician concerning the mental state of a person subject to a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant; provided, however, that this does not apply if it finds the hearing of opinions to be obviously unnecessary.

---

## Sources

- The dates and the amending laws: e-Gov (Digital Agency) (https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/423AC0000000052)
- English name of the law: Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice (https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/4512/tb)
- English titles of the amending laws: Written for this site with AI
- The Japanese text before: e-Gov (Digital Agency) (https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/423AC0000000052/20280613_505AC0000000053)
- The Japanese text after: e-Gov (Digital Agency) (https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/423AC0000000052/20281223_508AC0000000045)